Jefferson Warehouse Vs. U.S.

Jefferson Warehouse vs U.S.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-18-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100683

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100683
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-18-1963
Case Number: 372 U.S. 525
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jefferson Warehouse

Respondent

U.S.

Excerpt

jefferson warehouse v. u.s. - 372 u.s. 525 (1963) u.s. supreme court jefferson warehouse v. u.s., 372 u.s. 525 (1963) 372 u.s. 525 jefferson warehouse & cold storage co. et al. v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of alabama. no. 617. decided march 18, 1963. 205 f. supp. 640, affirmed. james w. wrape, james n. clay iii and richard a. bishop for appellants. solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general guilfoyle, alan s. rosenthal and pauline b. heller for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 372 u.s. 525, 526

Full Judgment

JEFFERSON WAREHOUSE v. U.S. - 372 U.S. 525 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court JEFFERSON WAREHOUSE v. U.S., 372 U.S. 525 (1963) 372 U.S. 525

JEFFERSON WAREHOUSE & COLD STORAGE CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 617.
Decided March 18, 1963.

205 F. Supp. 640, affirmed.

James W. Wrape, James N. Clay III and Richard A. Bishop for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle, Alan S. Rosenthal and Pauline B. Heller for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 372 U.S. 525, 526

Same Parties Jefferson Warehouse vs U.S. Same Subject Land Acquisition