Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Avent Vs. North Carolina

Avent vs North Carolina

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-20-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100596

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
373 U.S. 375
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Avent

Respondent

North Carolina

Excerpt

avent v. north carolina - 373 u.s. 375 (1963) u.s. supreme court avent v. north carolina, 373 u.s. 375 (1963) avent v. north carolina no. 11 argued november 5, 7, 1962 decided may 20, 1963 373 u.s. 375 certiorari to the supreme court of north carolina syllabus in durham, n.c., which has an ordinance requiring racial segregation in public eating places, five negro students and two white students were convicted of criminal trespass for sitting at a lunch counter where only white people customarily were served and refusing to leave when requested by the manager. held: a judgment affirming their conviction is vacated, and the case is remanded to the supreme court of north carolina for consideration in the light of peterson v. city of greenville, ante, p. 373 u. s. 244 . per curiam. the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the supreme court of north carolina for consideration in the light of peterson v. city of greenville, ante, p. 373 u. s. 244 . patterson v. alabama, 294 u. s. 600 . [for opinion of mr. justice harlan, see ante, p. 373 u. s. 248 .]

Full Judgment

Avent v. North Carolina - 373 U.S. 375 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 375 (1963)

Avent v. North Carolina

No. 11

Argued November 5, 7, 1962

Decided May 20, 1963

373 U.S. 375

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

SYLLABUS

In Durham, N.C., which has an ordinance requiring racial segregation in public eating places, five Negro students and two white students were convicted of criminal trespass for sitting at a lunch counter where only white people customarily were served and refusing to leave when requested by the manager.

Held: a judgment affirming their conviction is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in the light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 373 U. S. 244 .

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in the light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 373 U. S. 244 . Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 600 .

[For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see ante, p. 373 U. S. 248 .]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial