Davis Vs. Soja

Davis vs Soja

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100519

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100519
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1963
Case Number: 374 U.S. 495
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Davis

Respondent

Soja

Excerpt

davis v. soja - 374 u.s. 495 (1963) u.s. supreme court davis v. soja, 374 u.s. 495 (1963) 374 u.s. 495 davis, trustee, v. soja, internal revenue agent. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. no. 271. decided june 17, 1963. judgment vacated and case remanded to district court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot. reported below: 303 f.2d 601 . walter j. rockler for petitioner. solicitor general cox for respondent. per curiam. it appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the northern district of illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. page 374 u.s. 495, 496

Full Judgment

DAVIS v. SOJA - 374 U.S. 495 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963) 374 U.S. 495

DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot.

Reported below: 303 F.2d 601 .

Walter J. Rockler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Page 374 U.S. 495, 496

Same Parties Davis vs Soja Same Subject Miscellaneous