Canton Co. Vs. Comptroller of the Treasury

Canton Co. vs Comptroller of the Treasury

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-28-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100458

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100458
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-28-1963
Case Number: 375 U.S. 58
Subject: Sales Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Sales Tax

Key legal issue: Sales Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Canton Co.

Respondent

Comptroller of the Treasury

Excerpt

canton co. v. comptroller of the treasury - 375 u.s. 58 (1963) u.s. supreme court canton co. v. comptroller of the treasury, 375 u.s. 58 (1963) 375 u.s. 58 canton co. of baltimore v. comptroller of the treasury, retail sales tax division, maryland. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 365. decided october 28, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 231 md. 294, 190 a. 2d 92. francis d. murnaghan, jr. for appellant. thomas b. finan, attorney general of maryland, robert c. murphy, deputy attorney general, and franklin goldstein, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 375 u.s. 58, 59

Full Judgment

CANTON CO. v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY - 375 U.S. 58 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CANTON CO. v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY, 375 U.S. 58 (1963) 375 U.S. 58

CANTON CO. OF BALTIMORE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY, RETAIL
SALES TAX DIVISION, MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 365.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 231 Md. 294, 190 A. 2d 92.

Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. for appellant.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, and Franklin Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 58, 59

Same Parties Canton Co. vs Comptroller of the Treasury Same Subject Sales Tax