Certified Credit Corp. Vs. Bowers

Certified Credit Corp. vs Bowers

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-18-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100448

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100448
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Nov-18-1963
Case Number: 375 U.S. 84
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Certified Credit Corp.

Respondent

Bowers

Excerpt

certified credit corp. v. bowers - 375 u.s. 84 (1963) u.s. supreme court certified credit corp. v. bowers, 375 u.s. 84 (1963) 375 u.s. 84 certified credit corp. v. bowers, tax commissioner of ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 430. decided november 18, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 174 ohio st. 239, 188 n. e. 2d 594. robert l. barton, joseph b. devennish and joseph r. hague for appellant. william b. saxbe, attorney general of ohio, and daronne r. tate, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 375 u.s. 84, 85

Full Judgment

CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS - 375 U.S. 84 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, 375 U.S. 84 (1963) 375 U.S. 84

CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 430.
Decided November 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 239, 188 N. E. 2d 594.

Robert L. Barton, Joseph B. DeVennish and Joseph R. Hague for appellant.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Daronne R. Tate, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 84, 85

Same Parties Certified Credit Corp. vs Bowers Same Subject Land Acquisition