Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smith Vs. California

Smith vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-16-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100431

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
375 U.S. 259
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

California

Excerpt

smith v. california - 375 u.s. 259 (1963) u.s. supreme court smith v. california, 375 u.s. 259 (1963) 375 u.s. 259 smith v. california. certiorari to the appellate department, superior court of california, county of los angeles. no. 72. decided december 16, 1963. judgment vacated and case remanded. stanley fleishman and sam rosenwein for petitioner. roger arnebergh, philip e. grey and wm. e. doran for respondent. briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by edward de grazia for allen et al.; by thomas m. thomas for american library association, and by nathan l. schoichet, a. l. wirin and fred okrand for american civil liberties union of southern california. charles h. keating, jr. for citizens for decent literature, inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of respondent. per curiam. the motion of citizens for decent literature, inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the appellate department of the superior court of california, county of los angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the supreme court of california in zeitlin v. arnebergh, 59 cal. 2d 901, 383 p.2d 152. page 375 u.s. 259, 260

Full Judgment

SMITH v. CALIFORNIA - 375 U.S. 259 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 259 (1963) 375 U.S. 259

SMITH v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 72.
Decided December 16, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent.

Briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by Edward de Grazia for Allen et al.; by Thomas M. Thomas for American Library Association, and by Nathan L. Schoichet, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of California in Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901, 383 P.2d 152.

Page 375 U.S. 259, 260



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial