Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fields Vs. City of Fairfield

Fields vs City of Fairfield

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-16-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100428

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
375 U.S. 248
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fields

Respondent

City of Fairfield

Excerpt

fields v. city of fairfield - 375 u.s. 248 (1963) u.s. supreme court fields v. city of fairfield, 375 u.s. 248 (1963) 375 u.s. 248 fields et al. v. city of fairfield. appeal from the supreme court of alabama. no. 30. argued december 10-11, 1963. decided december 16, 1963. 273 ala. 588, 143 so.2d 177, reversed. melvin l. wulf argued the cause for appellants. with him on the brief were charles morgan, jr. and richard j. medalie. frank b. parsons argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. assistant attorney general marshall, by special leave of court, argued the cause for the united states, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. with him on the brief were solicitor general cox, louis f. claiborne, harold h. greene and howard a. glickstein. jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii and shirley fingerhood filed a brief for the n. a. a. c. p. legal defense and educational fund, inc., as amicus curiae, urging reversal. per curiam. the judgment of the supreme court of alabama is reversed. thompson v. city of louisville, 362 u.s. 199 ; garner v. louisiana, 368 u.s. 157 . page 375 u.s. 248, 249

Full Judgment

FIELDS v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD - 375 U.S. 248 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FIELDS v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, 375 U.S. 248 (1963) 375 U.S. 248

FIELDS ET AL. v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 30.
Argued December 10-11, 1963.
Decided December 16, 1963.

273 Ala. 588, 143 So.2d 177, reversed.

Melvin L. Wulf argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Charles Morgan, Jr. and Richard J. Medalie.

Frank B. Parsons argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.

Assistant Attorney General Marshall, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Shirley Fingerhood filed a brief for the N. A. A. C. P. Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama is reversed. Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199 ; Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 .

Page 375 U.S. 248, 249



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial