Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Warren Vs. Larson

Warren vs Larson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-16-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100365
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
369 U.S. 427

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Warren

Respondent

Larson

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

warren v. larson - 369 u.s. 427 (1962) u.s. supreme court warren v. larson, 369 u.s. 427 (1962) 369 u.s. 427 warren v. larson, state treasurer. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 920, misc. decided april 16, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 132 so.2d 177. walter warren for appellant. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and robert j. kelly and gerald mager, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mr. justice frankfurter and mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 427, 428

Full Judgment

WARREN v. LARSON - 369 U.S. 427 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court WARREN v. LARSON, 369 U.S. 427 (1962) 369 U.S. 427

WARREN v. LARSON, STATE TREASURER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 920, Misc.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 132 So.2d 177.

Walter Warren for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert J. Kelly and Gerald Mager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 427, 428




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial