Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Managed Funds, Inc. Vs. Brouk

Managed Funds, Inc. vs Brouk

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-16-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100362

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
369 U.S. 424
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Managed Funds, Inc.

Respondent

Brouk

Excerpt

managed funds, inc. v. brouk - 369 u.s. 424 (1962) u.s. supreme court managed funds, inc. v. brouk, 369 u.s. 424 (1962) 369 u.s. 424 managed funds, inc., v. brouk et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. no. 87. decided april 16, 1962. judgment vacated and case remanded to district court with directions to dismiss cause of action as to respondents. reported below: 286 f.2d 901 . r. walston chubb for petitioner. forrest m. hemker for brouk et al. and william stix for baker et al., respondents. solicitor general cox, daniel m. friedman, allan f. conwill and walter p. north for the securities and exchange commission, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. per curiam. upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents. mr. justice frankfurter and mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 424, 425

Full Judgment

MANAGED FUNDS, INC. v. BROUK - 369 U.S. 424 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court MANAGED FUNDS, INC. v. BROUK, 369 U.S. 424 (1962) 369 U.S. 424

MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 87.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss cause of action as to respondents.

Reported below: 286 F.2d 901 .

R. Walston Chubb for petitioner.

Forrest M. Hemker for Brouk et al. and William Stix for Baker et al., respondents.

Solicitor General Cox, Daniel M. Friedman, Allan F. Conwill and Walter P. North for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 424, 425



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial