Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kemp Vs. United States

Kemp vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-14-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100348

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
369 U.S. 661
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kemp

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

kemp v. united states - 369 u.s. 661 (1962) u.s. supreme court kemp v. united states, 369 u.s. 661 (1962) 369 u.s. 661 kemp v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 311, misc. decided may 14, 1962. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of coppedge v. united states, ante, p. 438. a. kenneth pye for petitioner. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller, beatrice rosenberg and robert g. maysack for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of coppedge v. united states, ante, p. 438. mr. justice clark and mr. justice harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the coppedge case. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 661, 662

Full Judgment

KEMP v. UNITED STATES - 369 U.S. 661 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court KEMP v. UNITED STATES, 369 U.S. 661 (1962) 369 U.S. 661

KEMP v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 311, Misc.
Decided May 14, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

A. Kenneth Pye for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 661, 662



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial