Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Busby Vs. Harris

Busby vs Harris

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-28-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100328

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
370 U.S. 48
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Busby

Respondent

Harris

Excerpt

busby v. harris - 370 u.s. 48 (1962) u.s. supreme court busby v. harris, 370 u.s. 48 (1962) 370 u.s. 48 busby et al. v. harris, judge, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 728, misc. decided may 28, 1962. certiorari granted; judgment of court of appeals vacated and case remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot. petitioners pro se. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general marshall, harold h. greene and howard a. glickstein for respondents. per curiam. upon the solicitor general's suggestion of mootness and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the case is moot. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 370 u.s. 48, 49

Full Judgment

BUSBY v. HARRIS - 370 U.S. 48 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court BUSBY v. HARRIS, 370 U.S. 48 (1962) 370 U.S. 48

BUSBY ET AL. v. HARRIS, JUDGE, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 728, Misc.
Decided May 28, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings as moot.

Petitioners pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the Solicitor General's suggestion of mootness and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the case is moot.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 48, 49



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial