Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Marakar Vs. United States

Marakar vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-25-1962
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100292

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
370 U.S. 723
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Marakar

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

marakar v. united states - 370 u.s. 723 (1962) u.s. supreme court marakar v. united states, 370 u.s. 723 (1962) 370 u.s. 723 marakar v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit. no. 1191, misc. decided june 25, 1962. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 1234, misc., ali v. united states, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. certiorari granted; judgments vacated; causes remanded with directions to dismiss the indictments. reported below: 300 f.2d 513 . joseph f. walsh for petitioner in no. 1191, misc. harry t. carter for petitioner in no. 1234, misc. solicitor general cox for the united states. per curiam. the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. on motion of the solicitor general and upon an examination of the entire record, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the causes are remanded to the united states district court for the district of new jersey with directions to dismiss the indictments. mr. justice black, mr. justice douglas, and mr. justice brennan join the court's disposition because they believe that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment was an insurmountable barrier to the prosecution of these petitioners under the separate indictments returned on april 26, 1961, charging each petitioner with a substantive offense of illegally bringing opium into this country. see abbate v. united states, 359 u.s. 187, 196 (separate opinion); cf. petite v. united states, 361 u.s. 529, 533 (dissenting opinion). mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 370 u.s. 723, 724

Full Judgment

MARAKAR v. UNITED STATES - 370 U.S. 723 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court MARAKAR v. UNITED STATES, 370 U.S. 723 (1962) 370 U.S. 723

MARAKAR v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 1191, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 1234, Misc., Ali v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; causes remanded with directions to dismiss the indictments.

Reported below: 300 F.2d 513 .

Joseph F. Walsh for petitioner in No. 1191, Misc.

Harry T. Carter for petitioner in No. 1234, Misc.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. On motion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the causes are remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey with directions to dismiss the indictments.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN join the Court's disposition because they believe that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment was an insurmountable barrier to the prosecution of these petitioners under the separate indictments returned on April 26, 1961, charging each petitioner with a substantive offense of illegally bringing opium into this country. See Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 196 (separate opinion); cf. Petite v. United States, 361 U.S. 529, 533 (dissenting opinion).

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 370 U.S. 723, 724



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial