Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thompson Vs. Whittier

Thompson vs Whittier

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-27-1961
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100165

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
365 U.S. 465
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thompson

Respondent

Whittier

Excerpt

thompson v. whittier - 365 u.s. 465 (1961) u.s. supreme court thompson v. whittier, 365 u.s. 465 (1961) 365 u.s. 465 thompson v. whittier, administrator of veterans affairs. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 500. decided february 27, 1961. appeal dismissed because the case does not arise under 28 u.s.c. 2282 and cannot be appealed directly to this court under 28 u.s.c. 1253. reported below: 185 f. supp. 306. mary m. kaufman for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general yeagley and kevin t. maroney for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted. the case does not arise under 28 u.s.c. 2282, requiring the convening of a three-judge court. see i. l. g. w. u. v. donnelly garment co., 304 u.s. 243 . therefore it cannot be directly brought here for review under 28 u.s.c. 1253, and the appeal must be dismissed. appellant is free to pursue his perfected appeal in the court of appeals. page 365 u.s. 465, 466

Full Judgment

THOMPSON v. WHITTIER - 365 U.S. 465 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court THOMPSON v. WHITTIER, 365 U.S. 465 (1961) 365 U.S. 465

THOMPSON v. WHITTIER, ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 500.
Decided February 27, 1961.

Appeal dismissed because the case does not arise under 28 U.S.C. 2282 and cannot be appealed directly to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253.

Reported below: 185 F. Supp. 306.

Mary M. Kaufman for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and Kevin T. Maroney for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted. The case does not arise under 28 U.S.C. 2282, requiring the convening of a three-judge court. See I. L. G. W. U. v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U.S. 243 . Therefore it cannot be directly brought here for review under 28 U.S.C. 1253, and the appeal must be dismissed. Appellant is free to pursue his perfected appeal in the Court of Appeals.

Page 365 U.S. 465, 466



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial