Skip to content
How to use Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Smith Vs. Smith

Smith vs Smith

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-01-1961
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100112
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
366 U.S. 210

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

Smith

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

How to use Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

smith v. smith - 366 u.s. 210 (1961) u.s. supreme court smith v. smith, 366 u.s. 210 (1961) 366 u.s. 210 smith v. smith. appeal from the circuit court of raleigh county, west virginia. no. 802. decided may 1, 1961. appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. j. w. maxwell for appellant. harold henkel smith for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the circuit court of raleigh county, state of west virginia, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. page 366 u.s. 210, 211

Full Judgment

SMITH v. SMITH - 366 U.S. 210 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. SMITH, 366 U.S. 210 (1961) 366 U.S. 210

SMITH v. SMITH.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RALEIGH COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 802.
Decided May 1, 1961.

Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

J. W. Maxwell for appellant.

Harold Henkel Smith for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, State of West Virginia, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

Page 366 U.S. 210, 211




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial