Anderson Vs. Alabama

Anderson vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-01-1961

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100110

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100110
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: May-01-1961
Case Number: 366 U.S. 208
Subject: Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue: Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anderson

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

anderson v. alabama - 366 u.s. 208 (1961) u.s. supreme court anderson v. alabama, 366 u.s. 208 (1961) 366 u.s. 208 anderson v. alabama. certiorari to the court of appeals of alabama. no. 326. argued april 25-26, 1961. decided may 1, 1961. 270 ala. 575, 120 so.2d 414, reversed. jack greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were peter a. hall, fred d. gray, orzell billingsley and thurgood marshall. david w. clark, assistant attorney general of alabama, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the briefs was macdonald gallion, attorney general. per curiam. the judgment is reversed. pierre v. louisiana, 306 u.s. 354 ; cassell v. texas, 339 u.s. 282 ; hernandez v. texas, 347 u.s. 475 . page 366 u.s. 208, 209

Full Judgment

ANDERSON v. ALABAMA - 366 U.S. 208 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court ANDERSON v. ALABAMA, 366 U.S. 208 (1961) 366 U.S. 208

ANDERSON v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 326.
Argued April 25-26, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.

270 Ala. 575, 120 So.2d 414, reversed.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Hall, Fred D. Gray, Orzell Billingsley and Thurgood Marshall.

David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U.S. 354 ; Cassell v. Texas, 339 U.S. 282 ; Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 .

Page 366 U.S. 208, 209

Same Parties Anderson vs Alabama Same Subject Direct Taxation