Payne Vs. Madigan

Payne vs Madigan

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-05-1961

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100068

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100068
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-05-1961
Case Number: 366 U.S. 761
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Payne

Respondent

Madigan

Excerpt

payne v. madigan - 366 u.s. 761 (1961) u.s. supreme court payne v. madigan, 366 u.s. 761 (1961) 366 u.s. 761 payne v. madigan, warden. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 180. argued february 27, 1961. decided june 5, 1961. * 274 f.2d 702 , 698, affirmed by an equally divided court. [ footnote * ] together with no. 184, young v. united states, on certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. frederick m. rowe, acting under appointment by the court, 364 u.s. 807, argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. with him on the briefs was howard p. willens. harold h. greene argued the cause for respondents in both cases. with him on the brief were solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general doar and david rubin. per curiam. the judgments are affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. page 366 u.s. 761, 762

Full Judgment

PAYNE v. MADIGAN - 366 U.S. 761 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court PAYNE v. MADIGAN, 366 U.S. 761 (1961) 366 U.S. 761

PAYNE v. MADIGAN, WARDEN.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 180.
Argued February 27, 1961.
Decided June 5, 1961. *

274 F.2d 702 , 698, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 184, Young v. United States, on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Frederick M. Rowe, acting under appointment by the Court, 364 U.S. 807, argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs was Howard P. Willens.

Harold H. Greene argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar and David Rubin.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 366 U.S. 761, 762