Bare Act Search Results
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Repealed] Repealing Act 1
Title: Trade Marks Act 1999
State: Central
Year: 1958
a well-known trade mark in India and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade mark. (3) A trade … registered trade mark has a reputation in India and the use of the mark without due cause takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the registered trade mark. (5) A registered
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAll India Services Act, 1951 Rule 26
Title: RULE 26: ACCEPTANCE OF EMPLOYMENT AFTER RETIREMENT
State: Central
Year: 1951
which such practice is to be set up are such as are likely to give his clients an unfair advantage by reason of .his previous official position, or (c) to undertake work involving liaison or contact with the … commercial duties be such that his official knowledge and experience could be used to give the employer an unfair advantage ? (iii) Will his duties be such as might bring him into conflict with Government ? (iv) Is
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTrade Marks Act, 1999 (47 of 1999) Chapter 4
Title: Effect of Registration
State: Central
Year: 1999
registered trade mark has a reputation in India and the use of the mark without due cause takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the registered trade mark. (5) A registered … A registered trade mark is infringed by any advertising of that trade mark if such advertising-- (a) takes unfair advantage of and is contrary to honest practices in industrial or commercial matters; or (b) is detrimental to its
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBrief the judgments behind these acts
The ASSAM PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT, 2017 Section 11
Title: Code of integrity for pro~uring entity and bidders
State: Assam
Year: 2017
of any bribe, reward or gift or any material benefit, either directly or indirectly, in exchange for an unfair advantage in the procurement process or to otherwise influence the procurement process; (ii) any omission, including a misrepresentation that … (iv) improper use of information shared between the procuring entity and the bidders with an intent to gain unfair advantage in the procurement process or for personal gain; (y) any financial or business transactions between the bidder and
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 2012 Section 11
Title: Code of integrity for procuring entity and bidders
State: Rajasthan
Year: 2012
of any bribe, reward or gift or any material benefit, either directly or indirectly, in exchange for an unfair advantage in the procurement process or to otherwise influence the procurement process; (ii) any omission, including a misrepresentation that … (iv) improper use of information shared between the procuring entity and the bidders with an intent to gain unfair advantage in the procurement process or for personal gain; (v) any financial or business transactions between the bidder and
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 Section 29
Title: Infringement of registered trade marks.—
State: Chandigarh
Year: 2000
registered trade mark has a reputation in India and the use of the mark without due cause takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the registered trade mark. 18 (5) A … A registered trade mark is infringed by any advertising of that trade mark if such advertising- (a) takes unfair advantage of and is contrary to honest practices in industrial or commercial matters; or (b) is detrimental to its
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Punjab Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 2019. Section 7
Title: (1) No officer or employee of a procuring entity or a person participating Code of integrity in a procurement process
State: Punjab
Year: 2019
any favour, bribe, reward or gift or any material benefit, either directly or indirectly, in exchange for an unfair advantage in the procurement process or to otherwise influence the procurement process or the action of other party; (ii) … (iv) improper use of information shared between the procuring entity and the bidders with an intent to gain unfair advantage in the procurement process or for personal gain; (v) any financial or business transactions between the bidder and
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSpecific Relief Act 1963 Section 20
Title: Discretion as to Decreeing Specific Performance
State: Central
Year: 1963
which the contract was entered into are such that the contract, though not voidable, gives the plaintiff an unfair advantage over the defendant; or (b) where the performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant … contract is onerous to the defendant or improvident in its nature, shall not be deemed to constitute an unfair advantage within the meaning of clause (a) or hardship within the meaning of clause (b). Explanation 2.--The question whether
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSpecific Relief Act 1963 Chapter II
Title: Specific Performance of Contracts
State: Central
Year: 1963
which the contract was entered into are such that the contract, though not voidable, gives the plaintiff an unfair advantage over the defendant; or (b) where the performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant … contract is onerous to the defendant or improvident in its nature, shall not be deemed to constitute an unfair advantage within the meaning of clause (a) or hardship within the meaning of clause (b). Explanation 2.--The question whether
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSpecific Relief Act 1963 Part II
Title: Specific Relief
State: Central
Year: 1963
which the contract was entered into are such that the contract, though not voidable, gives the plaintiff an unfair advantage over the defendant; or (b) where the performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant … contract is onerous to the defendant or improvident in its nature, shall not be deemed to constitute an unfair advantage within the meaning of clause (a) or hardship within the meaning of clause (b). Explanation 2.--The question whether
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI research tools - 7 days free