Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: section 63 of the evidence actCommercial Documents Evidence Act, 1939 Complete Act
Title : Commercial Documents Evidence Act, 1939
State : Central
Year : 1939
Preamble1 - COMMERCIAL DOCUMENTS EVIDENCE ACT, 1939 Section1 - Short title and extent Section2 - Statements of relevant facts in scheduled documents to be themselves relevant facts Section3 - Presumption as to genuineness of documents Section4 - Definition Schedule1 - SCHEDULE
List Judgments citing this sectionBankers Books Evidence Act, 1891 Complete Act
Title : Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891
State : Central
Year : 1891
Preamble1 - BANKERS' BOOKS EVIDENCE ACT, 1891 Section1 - Title and extent Section2 - Definitions Section2A - Conditions in the printout Section3 - Powers to extend provisions of Act Section4 - Mode of proof of entries in bankers' books Section5 - Case in which officer of bank not compellable to produce books Section6 - Inspection of books by order of Court or Judge Section7 - Costs Section8 - Order of court to be construed to be order made by specified officer Amending Act - Negotiable Instruments (Amendment And Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 (55 Of 2002)
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Complete Act
Title : Indian Evidence Act 1872
State : Central
Year : 1872
..... Section2 - Repeal of enactments Section3 - Interpretation clause Section4 - "May presume" Chapter 2 Section5 - Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts Section6 - Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction Section7 - Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue Section8 - Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct Section9 - Facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts Section10 - Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design Section11 - When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant Section12 - In suits for damages, facts tending to enable Court to determine amount are relevant Section13 - Facts relevant when right or custom is in question Section14 - Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling Section15 - Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional Section16 - Existence of course of business when relevant Section17 - Admission defined Section18 - Admission by party to proceeding or his agent by suitor in representative character Section19 - Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to.....
List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 63
Title : Secondary Evidence
State : Central
Year : 1872
.....a copy of a letter made by a copying machine is secondary evidence of the contents of the letter if it is shown that the copy made by the copying machine was made from the original. (c) A copy transcribed from a copy, but afterwards compared with the original, is secondary evidence; but the copy not so compared is not secondary evidence of the original, although the copy from which it was transcribed was compared with the original. (d) Neither art oral account of a copy compared with the original, nor an oral account of a photograph or machine copy of the original, is secondary evidence of the original. _______________________ 1. See. Section 76 infra.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBANKERS BOOKS EVIDENCE ACT, 1891 Preamble 1
Title : BANKERS' BOOKS EVIDENCE ACT, 1891
State : Central
Year : 1891
BANKERS' BOOKS EVIDENCE ACT, 1891 [Act, No. 18 of 1891] [1st October, 1891] PREAMBLE An Act to amend the Law of Evidence with respect to Bankers' Books. WHEREAS, it is expedient to amend the Law of Evidence with respect to Bankers' Books, it is hereby enacted as follows: -
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCommercial Documents Evidence Act, 1939 Preamble 1
Title : Commercial Documents Evidence Act, 1939
State : Central
Year : 1939
THE COMMERCIAL DOCUMENTS EVIDENCE ACT, 1939 [Act, No. 30 of 1939] [AS ON 1956] [26th September, 1939] PREAMBLE An Act amend the Law of Evidence with respect to certain commercial documents. WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the Law of Evidence with respect to certain commercial documents ; It is hereby enacted as follows :---
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 65
Title : Cases in Which Secondary Evidence Relating to Documents May Be Given
State : Central
Year : 1872
.....within the meaning of section 74; (f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this Act, or by any other law in force in1[India] to be given in evidence2; (g) when the original consists of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court and the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole collection. In cases (a), (c) and (d), any secondary evidence of the contents of the document is admissible. In case (b), the written admission is admissible. In case (e) or (f), a certified copy of the document, but no other kind of secondary evidence, is admissible. In case (g), evidence may be given as to the general result of the documents by any person who has examined them, and who is skilled in the examination of such documents. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 3 of 1951, section 3 and Schedule, for "the States". 2. Cf. the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 (18 of 1891), section 4.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Amending Act 1
Title : Indian Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2002
State : Central
Year : 1872
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 [Act, No. 4 of 2003] [31st December, 2002] PREAMBLE An Act further to amend the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-third Year of the Republic of India as follows:-- 1. Short title This Act may be called the Indian Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2002. 2. Amendment of section 146 In section 146 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872) (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), after clause (3), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-- "Provided that in a prosecution for rape or attempt to commit rape, it shall not be permissible to put questions in the cross-examination of the prosecutrix as to her general immoral character.". 3. Amendment of section 155 In section 155 of the principal Act, clause (4) shall be omitted.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Preamble 1
Title : The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
State : Central
Year : 1872
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 [Act, No. 1 of 1872]1 [15th March, 1872] Arrangement of Sections PREAMBLE WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate, define and amend the law of Evidence, it is hereby enacted as follows:- _____________________ 1. The Act has been extended to Goa, Daman and Diu by Reg. 11 of 1963, section 3 and Schedule., extended to and brought into force in Dadra and Nagar Haveli by Reg. 6 of 1963, section 2 and Schedule 1 (w.e.f. 1-7-1965) and to the whole of Union territory of Lakshadweep by Reg. 8 of 1965 (w.e.f. 1-10-1967). The Act came into force in Pondicherry on 1-10-1963 vide Reg. 7 of 1963, section 3 and Schedule 1. The Act has been amended in West Bengal by West Bengal Act 20 of 1960 and in Tamil Nadu by Tamil Nadu Act 67 of 1979.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 153
Title : Exclusion of Evidence to Contradict Answers to Questions Testing Veracity
State : Central
Year : 1872
.....of his previous conviction. Exception 2.If a witness is asked any question tending to impeach his impartiality, and answers it by denying the facts suggested, he may be contradicted. Illustrations (a) A claim against an underwriter is resisted on the ground of fraud. The claimant is asked whether, in a former transaction, he had not made a fraudulent claim. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that he did make such a claim. The evidence is inadmissible. (b) A witness is asked whether he was not dismissed from a situation for dishonesty. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that he was dismissed for dishonesty. The evidence is not admissible. (c) A affirms that on a certain day he saw B at Lahore. A is asked whether he himself was not on that day at Calcutta. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that A was on that day at Calcutta. The evidence is admissible, not as contradicting A on a fact which affects his credit, but as contradicting the alleged fact that B was seen on the day in question in Lahore. In each of these cases the witness might, if his denial was false, be charged with giving false evidence. (d) A is asked whether.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section