Skip to content


Bare Act Search Results

Home Bare Acts Phrase: review Page 1 of about 6,230 results (0.015 seconds)

Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Appeal to Securities Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 2000 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2000

.....Tribunal who is authorised by the Presiding Officer to function as Registrar;'. (i) "registry" means the registry of the Appellate Tribunal; (j) "rules" means the rules made under the Act; (k) "recognised stock exchange" means a stock exchange defined under clause (f) of Sec. 2 of the Act; (l) "stock exchange" means a stock exchange defined under clause (J') of Sec. 2 of the Act; (2) words and expressions used and not defined in these rules but defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act. RULE 03: LIMITATION FOR FILING APPEAL (1)Where a recognised stock exchange acting in pursuance of any power given to it by its bye-laws, refuses to list the securities of any company, the company shall be entitled to be furnished with reasons for such refusal and may,- (a) within 15 days from the date on which the reasons for such refusal are furnished to it, or (b) where the stock exchange had omitted or failed to dispose of, within the time specified in sub-sec. (1-A) of Sec. 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter in this rule referred to as the "specified time"), the application for permission for.....

List Judgments citing this section

Tamil Nadu Village Servant Classification Control and Appeal Rules, 1983 Complete Act

State: Tamil Nadu

Year: 1983

.....is satisfied that the delay is due to just and sufficient cause. (2) The Revenue Divisional Officer may, pending exercise of his powers under sub-rule (1), stay the execution of any order which is the subject matter of appeal. 7. Revision.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, of his own motion, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed by the Tahsildar and for reasons to be recorded in writing confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order, or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed or remit for re-consideration such order on any of the grounds specified in subrule (3). (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 5, the collector may of his own motion, or on the application of the person aggrieved, call for and examine the records relating to any order passed by the Revenue Division Officer and for reasons to be recorded in writing confirm, reduce, enhance or set aside the penalty imposed by the order or impose any penalty where no penalty has been imposed, or remit for reconsideration such order on any of the grounds specified in sub-rule(3). (3) The grounds.....

List Judgments citing this section

The Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 Complete Act

State: Chattisgarh

Year: 2006

.....if the petitioner satisfies the Division Bench that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within such period. Explanation.--The fact that the petitioner was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may by sufficient cause within the meaning of this sub-section. (3) An appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed, heard and decided in accordance with the procedure as may be prescribed by the High Court. Section 3 - Power to make rules (1) The High Court may, from time to time, make rules for carrying out all or any of the purpose of the Act. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for the procedure of filing, hearing and disposal of appeal under sub-section (3) of section 2. Section 4 - Repeal and Saving (1) The Chhattisgarh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Letter Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981 (No. 29 of 1981) is hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under or in pursuance of the said Act and which has attained finality shall not be reopened in any court of law. .....

List Judgments citing this section

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Chapter VI

Title: Appeal and Revision

State: Karnataka

Year: 1957

.....Act 4 of 1999 w.e.f. 1.4.1999. 3. Inserted by Act 18 of 1994 w.e.f. 1.4.1994. 4. Inserted by Act 7 of 1997 w.e.f. 1.4.1997. 5. Substituted by Act 9 of 1970 w.e.f. 1.4.1970. 6. Omitted by Act 16 of 1989 w.e.f. 1.4.1989. 7. Inserted by Act 16 of 1989 w.e.f. 1.4.1989. 8. Substituted by Act 15 of 1970 w.e.f. 1.4.1964. 9. Substituted by Act 18 of 1978 w.e.f. 1.9.1978. Section 20 - Appeals 1 [20. Appeals 2 [(1) Any person objecting to an order affecting him passed under the provisions of this Act by any officer not above the rank of a Deputy Commissioner may appeal to the Joint Commissioner:] 3 [Provided that no such appeal shall lie against an order in respect of which an application under section 12-D has been made.] (2) The appeal shall be preferred within thirty days,-- (i) in respect of an order of assessment, from the date on which the notice of assessment was served on the appellant, and (ii) in respect of any other order, from the date on which the order was communicated to the appellant: Provided that the appellate authority may admit an appeal preferred after the period of thirty days aforesaid, 4 [but within a further period of one hundred and.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Appendix G

Title: Appeal, Reference and Review

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....on the .................... day of .................... 19 ............ the .................... files this memorandum of cross objection under rule 22 of Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and sets forth the following grounds of objection to the decree appealed from, namely:- ...................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................... No.9 DECREE IN APPEAL (O. XLI, r. 35) (Title) Appeal No. .................... of 19 ............ from the decree of the Court of .................... dated the .................... day of .................... 19.... Memorandum of Appeal .............................................................................................................Plaintiff. .............................................................................................................Defendant. The ....................above-named appeals to the ............................. Court at .................... from the decree of............................ in the.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 Chapter V

Title: Appeal and Revision

State: Karnataka

Year: 1979

.....other person objecting to an order passed by the appellate authority 1 [under section 13 or an order passed by a revisional authority under 2 [sub-section (3)] of section 15] may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal within a period of sixty days from the date on which the order was communicated to him. (2) The Appellate Tribunal may admit an appeal preferred after the period of sixty days referred to in sub-section (1) 3 [but within a further period of one hundred and eighty days] if it is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within that period. 4 [(2A) The officer authorised under sub-section (1) or the person against whom an appeal has been preferred, as the case may be, on receipt of notice that an appeal against the order of the 5 [Deputy Commissioner] or the 5 [Joint Commissioner] has been preferred under sub-section (1) by the other party, may, notwithstanding that he has not appealed against such order or any part thereof, file 6 [at any time before the appeal is finally heard] a memorandum of cross objections, verified in the prescribed manner against any part of the order of the 5 [Deputy Commissioner] or the 5 [Joint.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 9 to 15

Title: Procedure on Admission of Appeal

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....time in the Appellate Court, unless he has appeared and filed an address for the service in the Court of first instance or has appeared in the appeal. (5) Nothing in sub-rule (4) shall bar the respondent referred to in the appeal from defending it.] 15. Contents of notice [Rep. by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 (46 of 1999) section 31 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002).] ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 46 of 1999, section 31(ii), for rule 9 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 2. Substituted by Act 2 of 1951, section 3 for "the States". 3. Substituted by Act 46 of 1999, section 31(iii), for sub-rule (1) (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 4. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 87(v) (w.e.f. 1-2-1977). 5. Substituted by Act 46 of 1999, section 31(iv), for sub-rule (2) (w.e.f. 1-7-2002).

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Rule 1 to 9

Title: Review

State: Central

Year: 1908

.....the appellant, or when; being respondent, he can present to the Appellate Court the case on which he applies for the review. 1 [Explanation.--The fact that the decision on a question of law on which the judgment of the Court is based has been reversed or modified by the subsequent decision of a superior Court in any other case, shall not be a ground for the review of such judgment.] 2. To whom applications for review may be made [Rep. by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1956 (66 of 1956), section 14 (w.e.f. 1-1-1957).] 3. Form of applications for review The provisions as to the form of preferring appeals shall apply mutatis mutandis, to applications for review. 4. Application where rejected (1) Where it appears to the Court that there is not sufficient ground for a review, it shall reject the application. (2) Application where granted.--Where the Court is of opinion that the application for review should be granted, it shall grant the same : Provided that-- (a) no such application shall be granted without previous notice to the opposite party, to enable him to appear and be heard in support of the decree or order, a review of which is applied.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act, 1979 Section 11

Title: Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal

State: Karnataka

Year: 1979

.....its discretion, give such directions as it thinks fit, in regard to the payment of tax, if the appellant furnishes sufficient security to its satisfaction in such form and manner as may be prescribed. (7) (a) The Appellate Tribunal may, on the application either of the appellant or of the respondent, review any order passed by it under sub-section (5) on the basis of facts which were not before it when it passed the order: Provided that no such application shall be preferred more than once in respect of the same order. (b) The application for review shall be preferred in the prescribed manner within six months from the date on which the order to which the application relates was communicated to the applicant and , where the application is preferred by any person other than an officer empowered by the State Government under sub-section (1), it shall be accompanied by a fee equal to that which had been paid in respect of the appeal : Provided that if the application for review is preferred within ninety days from the date on which the order to which application relates is communicated to the applicant, the application shall be accompanied by half the fee which had been.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 Section 14

Title: Appeal to the Appellate Tribunal

State: Karnataka

Year: 1979

.....its discretion, give such directions as it thinks fit, in regard to the payment of tax, if the appellant furnishes sufficient security to its satisfaction in such form and manner as may be prescribed. (7) (a) The Appellate Tribunal may, on the application either of the appellant or of the respondent, review any order passed by it under subsection (5) on the basis of facts which were not before it when it passed the order : Provided that no such application shall be preferred more than once in respect of the same order. (b) The application for review shall be preferred in the prescribed manner within six months from the date on which the order to which application relates was communicated to the applicant ; and where the application is preferred by any person other than an officer empowered by the State Government under sub-section (1), it shall be accompained by a fee equal to that which had been paid in respect of the appeal : Provided that if the application for review is preferred within ninety days from the date on which the order to which application relates is communicated to the applicant, the application shall be accompained by half the fee which had been paid.....

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //