Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: respondeat superior Page 1 of about 797 results (0.009 seconds)BOMBAY CITY (INAMI AND SPECIAL TENURES) ABOLITION AND MAHARASHTRA LAND REVENUE CODE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1969, (Maharashtra) Section 4
Title: Abolition of inami tenure and special tenures; extinguishment of superior holder's rights; and liability to pay land revenue
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1969
.....be liable to the State Government for the payment of land revenue equal to the amount of cess, rent or assessment which is payable in respect thereof immediately before the appointed day to the superior holder, or as the case may be, to the State Government under the terms of the tenure, or (ii) shall be held free from payment of land revenue, if no such cess, rent or assessment is payable in respect thereof immediately before the appointed day. NOTES The intention of the section indicates that it is meant for "extending the benefit to the public trusts even in the cases where the property is let out and not necessarily used physically, therefore the trustees are entitled to claim exemption certificates under section 4(2) in respect of the lands in question". Now roji Jehangir Gamadia & others v. Dy. Collector, Bombay, 1986 Mah. L. J. 582.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay City (Inami and Special Tenures) Abolition and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1969, (Maharashtra) Section 18
Title: Superior Holder to Deliver Records to Authorised Officers
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1969
(1) Whenever an officer authorised by the State Government in this behalf so directs, the superior holder shall deliver to him or such other officer as may be specified in the direction, the records relating to his land maintained by him. (2) If the superior holder fails without reasonable cause to deliver any such records, he shall, on conviction, be punished with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees. In the case of a continuing failure to deliver any such records, the superior holder shall be punished with an additional fine which may extend to twenty-five rupees for every day during which such failure continues after conviction for the first such failure.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBorder Security Force Act, 1968 Section 21
Title: Disobedience to Superior Officer
State: Central
Year: 1968
(1) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a wilful defiance of authority any lawful command given personally by his superior officer in the execution of his officer whether the same is given orally, or in writing or by signal or otherwise, shall, on conviction by a Security Force Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned. (2) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys any lawful command given by his superior officer shall, on conviction by a Security Force Court,-- (a) if he commits such offence when on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned; and (b) if he commits such offence when not on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Police Act, 1951, (Maharashtra) Section 97
Title: a Superior Police Officer May Himself Perform Duties Imposed on His Inferior; Etc.
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1951
A. Police officer of rank superior to that of constable may perform any duty assigned by Law or by a lawful order to any officer subordinate to him and in case of any duty imposed on such subordinate, a superior where it shall appear to him necessary, my aid, supplement supersede or prevent any action of such subordinate by his own action or that of any person lawfully acting under his commend or authority, whenever the same shall appear necessary or expedient for giving more complete or convenient effect to the law or for avoiding as infringement thereof.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Police Act, 1963 Section 77
Title: A Superior Police Officer May Himself Perform Duties Imposed on His Inferior, Etc
State: Karnataka
Year: 1963
A Police Officer of rank superior to that of a constable may perform any duty assigned by law or by a lawful order to any officer subordinate to him; and in case of any duty imposed on such subordinate, a superior where it shall appear to him necessary may aid, supplement, supersede or prevent any action of such subordinate by his own action or that of any person lawfully acting under his command or authority, whenever the same shall appear necessary or expedient for giving more complete or convenient effect to the law or for avoiding an infringement thereof.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSashastra Seema Bal Act 2007 Section 23
Title: Disobedience to Superior Officer
State: Central
Year: 2007
(1) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a wilful defiance of authority any lawful command given personally by his superior officer in the execution of his office whether the same is given orally, or In writing or by signal or otherwise, shall, on conviction by a Force Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned. (2) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys any lawful command given by his superior officer shall, on conviction by a Force Court,-- (a) if he commits such offence when on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned; and (b) if he commits such offence when not on active duty, be liable to surfer imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNational Security Guard Act 1986 Section 21
Title: Disobedience to Superior Officer
State: Central
Year: 1986
(1) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys, in such manner as to show a wilful defiance of authority, any lawful command given personally by his superior officer in the execution of his office whether the same is given orally, or in writing or by signal or othrewise, shall, on conviction by a Security Guard Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned. (2) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys any lawful command given by his superior officer shall, on conviction by a Security Guard Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAssam Rifles Act, 2006 Section 28
Title: Disobedience to Superior Officer
State: Central
Year: 2006
(1) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys, in such manner as to show a wilful defiance of authority, any lawful command given personally by his superior officer in the execution of his office whether the same is given orally, or in writing or by signal or otherwise, shall, on conviction by an Assam Rifles Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned. (2) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys any lawful command given by his superior officer shall, on conviction by an Assam Rifles Court,-- (a) if he commits such offence when on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned; and (b) if he commits such offence when not on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndo-tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992 Section 23
Title: Disobedience to Superior Officer
State: Central
Year: 1992
(1) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a wilful defiance of authority any lawful command given personally by his superior officer in the execution of his office whether the same is given orally, or in writing or by signal or otherwise, shall, on conviction by a Force Court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned. (2) Any person subject to this Act who disobeys any lawful command given by his superior officer shall, on conviction by a Force Court, (a) if he commits such offence when on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned; and (b) if he commits such offence when not on active duty, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAir Force Act, 1950 Section 89
Title: Superior Air Force Authority
State: Central
Year: 1950
For the purposes of sections 87 and 88,a "superior air force authority"means.-- (a) in the case of punishments awarded by a commanding officer, anyofficer superior in command to such commanding officer; (b) in the case of punishments awarded by anyother authority,the Central Government, 1 [the Chief of the Air Staff] orother officerspecified by 1 [theChief of the Air Staff]. ___________________________ 1.Substitutedfor thewords "the Commander-in-Chiefby the Commanders-in-Chief (Changein Designation) Act (19of 1955),S. 2and Sch. (7-5-1955).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>