Bare Act Search Results

The Uttaranchal (the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964) Adaptation and Modification Order, 2002 (Second Amendment) Act, 2006 Complete Act

State: Uttarakhand

Year: 1964

.....ACT, 2006 THE UTTARANCHAL (THE UTTAR PRADESH KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI ADHINIYAM, 1964) ADAPTATION AND MODIFICATION ORDER, 2002 (SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 2006 [Act No. 5 of 2006] PREAMBLE An Act further to amend the Uttaranchal (The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964) Adaptation and Modification Order, 2002 in application to the State of Uttaranchal Be it enacted by the State Assembly in the Fifty-seventh Year of the Republic of India, as follows:-- Section 1 - Short title, application and commencement (1) This Act may be called the Uttaranchal (The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964) Adaptation and Modification Order, 2002 (Second Amendment) Act, 2006. (2) It shall be applicable to the whole State of Uttaranchal. (3) It shall come into force at once. Section 2 - Amendment of Section 13, sub-section (7) of the principal Act The Uttaranchal (The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964) Adaptation and Modification Order, 2002 shall be amended as follows:-- 'The words "The elected members of shall be prefixed to sub-section (7) of Section 13.'. Section 3 - Repeal and Savings (1) The Uttaranchal (The Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi.....

Companies Profits Surtax Act 1964 Section 17

Title: Revision of Orders by [Chief Commissioner or Commissioner]

State: Central

Year: 1964

.....to the assessee, as he thinks fit. (2) The1[Chief Commissioner or Commissioner] shall not of his own motion revise any order under this section if the order has been made more than one year previously. (3) In the case of an application for revision under this section by the assessee, the application shall be made within one year from the date on which the order in question was communicated to him or the date on which he otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier: Provided that the1[Chief Commissioner or Commissioner] may, if he is satisfied that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within that period, admit an application made after the expiry of that period. (4) The1[Chief Commissioner or Commissioner] shall not revise any order under this section in the following cases. 3[(a) where an appeal against the order lies to the Commissioner (Appeals) but has not been made and the time within which such appeal may be made has not expired, or the assessee has not waived his right of appeal; or, [(b) where the order has been ma Je the subject of an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals).] (5) Every application by an.....

Companies Profits Surtax Act 1964 Section 16

Title: Revision of Orders Prejudicial to Revenue

State: Central

Year: 1964

.....assessment and directing a fresh assessment. 2 [Explanation.--For the removal of "doubts, it is hereby declared that, for the purposes ofthis sub-section, an order passed by the 1 [Assessing Officer] shallinclude an order passed by the 1 [Deputy Commissioner] in exercise ofthe powers or in performance of the functions of an 1 [AssessingOfficer] conferred on, or assigned to, him under clause (a) of sub-section (1)of section 125 or under sub-section (1) of section 125A of the Income-tax Act asapplied by section 18 of this Act.] 3 [(2)No order shall be made under sub-section (1) after the expiry of two years fromthe end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised waspassed]. (3)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), an order in revisionunder this section may be passed at any time in the case of an order which hasbeen passed in consequence of, or to give effect to, any finding or directioncontained in an order of the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court or the SupremeCourt. Explanation.--In computing the period oflimitation for the purpose of sub-section (2), anyperiod during which any proceeding under this section is stayed by an order.....

GOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Section 7

Title: Appeals to lie to the Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Tribunal de Relacao

State: Central

Year: 1964

Any person aggrieved- (a) By any judgment, decree, order or sentence of the Tribunal de Relacao passed or made before the 20th December, 1961, against which an appeal would lie to a superior Court in Portugal in accordance with law but could not be preferred by reason of Goa, Daman and Diu becoming part of the territory of India, or against which an appeal having been preferred to a superior Court in Portugal in accordance with law had not been disposed of before the said date; or (b) By any judgment, decree, order or sentence of the Tribunal de Relacao passed or made on or after the 20th December, 1961, may, within ninety days from the date of passing of this Act, prefer an appeal from such judgment, decree, order or sentence to the Supreme Court as if such judgment, decree, order or sentence had been passed or made by the Judicial Commissioner's Court.

Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Section 49

Title: Appeals from Original Orders

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

Save as otherwise expressly provided, an appeal shall lie from every original order passed under this Act or the rules made thereunder, 1 [and from every order made in exercise of the powers conferred by section 54 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act 5 of 1908)],-- (a) if such an order is passed by a Revenue Officer subordinate to the Assistant Commissioner, 1 [whether or not invested 2 [or delegated] with the powers of the Assistant Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner] to the Assistant Commissioner; (b) if such an order is passed by the Assistant Commissioner whether ornot invested with the powers of the Deputy Commissioner, to the Deputy Commissioner; 3 [(c) if such an order is passed by the Deputy Commissioner, to the Tribunal; (d) if such an order is passed by the Divisional Commissioner, to theTribunal; (e) if such an order is passed by a Survey Officer below the rank of anAssistant Superintendent of Land Records or the Assistant Superintendent for Settlement, to the Assistant Superintendent of Land Records or the Assistant Superintendent for Settlement, as the case may be; (f) if such an order is passed by a Survey Officer of the rank of.....

Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Section 55

Title: Stay of Execution of Orders

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

(1) A Revenue Officer who has passed an order or his successor in office, may at any time before the expiry of the period prescribed for appeal, direct the execution of such order to be stayed for such time as may be requisite for filing the appeal and obtaining a stay order from the appellate authority. (2) The appellate authority may, at any time, direct that the execution ofthe order appealed from, be stayed for such time as it may think fit, or till the decision of the appeal, whichever is earlier and may on sufficient cause being shown, cancel or vary such order made directing stay. (3) No order directing the stay of execution of any order shall be passedexcept in accordance with the provisions of this section.

KARNATAKA MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1964 Section 306

Title: Deputy Commissioner's power of suspending execution of orders, etc. of municipal councils

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

(1) If, in the opinion of the Deputy Commissioner, the execution of any order or resolution of a town municipal council, or the doing of anything which is about to be done or is being done by or on behalf of a town municipal council, is unlawful or is causing or is likely to cause injury or annoyance to the public, or to lead to a breach of the peace, he may, by order in writing under his signature, suspend the execution or prohibit the doing thereof. (2) When a Deputy Commissioner makes any order under this section, he shall forthwith forward to Government and to the Commissioner and to the municipal council affected thereby a copy of the order, with a statement of the reasons for making it; and it shall be in the discretion of the Government to rescind the order, or to direct that it shall continue in force with or without modification, permanently or for such period as it thinks fit: Provided that no order of the Deputy Commissioner passed under this section shall be confirmed, revised or modified by the Government without giving the municipal council, a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the said order.

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 231

Title: Power of City Municipal Councils to Order Demolition of Buildings Unfit for Human Habitation

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

.....date of the order, and that it shall be demolished within six weeks after the expiration of that period. (4) In determining for the purposes of section 230 and this section whether a building is unfit for human habitation, regard shall be had to its condition in respect of the following matters, that is to say, -- (a) repair; (b) stability; (c) freedom from damp; (d) natural light and air; (e) water supply; (f) drainage and sanitary conveniences; (g) facilities for storage, preparation and cooking of food and for the disposal of rubbish, filth and other polluted matter; and the building shall be deemed to be unfit as aforesaid if and only if it is so far defective in one or more of the said matters, that it is not reasonably suitable for occupation in that condition. (5) For the purposes of section 230 and this section, "work of improvement" in relation to a building includes any one or more of the following works, namely:-- (a) necessary repairs; (b) structural alterations; (c) provision of light points and water taps; (d) construction of drains, open or covered; (e) provision of latrines and urinals; (f) provision of additional or improved.....

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 383

Title: Orders for Bringing This Act into Force

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

.....necessary or expedient in connection with any of the matters aforesaid for varying the powers or jurisdiction of any court or authority and empowering new courts or other authorities to exercise such jurisdiction as may be specified in such order. (2) Any order under sub-section (1) may be either prospective orrestrospective in operation as may be specified in such order. (3) All orders made under sub-section (1) shall be laid before both Housesof the State Legislature and shall subject to such modifications as the State Legislature may make during the session in which they are so laid, have effect as if enacted in this Act. _______________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 36 of 1994 w.e.f. 1.6.1994.

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 298

Title: Application Against Order of Surcharge or Charge

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

(1) Any person aggrieved by any order of surcharge or charge made by the Commissioner under sub-section (1) of section 296 may, within one month from the receipt by him of the decision of the Commissioner either, -- (a) apply to the District Court to set aside such order; and the court, after taking such evidence as it thinks necessary, may, confirm, modify or remit such surcharge or charge and make such orders as to costs as it thinks proper in the circumstances; or (b) in lieu of such application apply to the Government which shall pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit. (2) Pending disposal of the application all proceedings on the certificate shall be stayed if the person aggrieved makes out a prima facie case to the satisfaction of the District Court or the Government for the issue of a stay order.