Goa Daman And Diu Judicial Commissioner S Court Declaration As High Court Act 1964 Repealed Section 7 - Judgment Search Results

Kailash Moudgil Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)72ITD97(Delhi)

special bench order fortunately we came across a decision of goa daman amp diu judicial commissioner s court clarifying the meaning yeshwant vishnu sahastrabudhe v vassant vithal govekar air 1969 goa daman amp diu 37 the question in that case was whether sahastrabudhe v vassant vithal govekar air 1969 goa daman amp diu 37 the question in that case was whether the permission we have already stated that giving approval does not involve judicial proceeding when there is no judicial proceeding and when we 80 1980 81 or 1981 82 the reference by the commissioner to the board for approval of the imposition of penalty of that authority before granting sanction the hon ble supreme court held that the said authority can validly question by filing of fact when the law dealing with the subject has declared those findings as final and conclusive secondly it was contended member has been given a right of appeal to the high court under section 22a of the act to exercise his a was replaced by section 127 of the i t act 1961 which now makes it obligatory to record reasons in requirements of section 6 of the income tax management act 1964 under the provisions of which the late assessments to which arguments in the appeal proceedings against the assessment order under section 158bc in answer to question no 2 a we hold in dhakeswari cotton mills ltd v cit 1954 26 itr 775 sc the question debated was what are the circumstances under

Shri Sanjay Z. Rane, Vs. Smt. Saibai S. Dubaxi (Since Deceased Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2668

..... for any such intra court appeals goa daman and diu judicial commissioner s court declaration as high court act 1964 was then brought into force with effect from 16 12 1963 and section 8 of the said act repealed section 7 of 1962 act attention has been invited .....

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. R.C. Misra and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj155; 2003(1)WLN371

..... govt has also conveyed its no objection to the proposal to repeal this act for the repeal of the goa daman and diu judicial commissioner s court declaration as high court act 1964 it was stated that since it has since long been abolished ..... like under section 100 a of c p c as inserted by amendment brought into effect w e f 1 7 2002 such power continue to be exercised by all other high courts under .....

Jose Da Costa and anr. Vs. Bascora Sadasiva Sinai Narcornim and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC1843; (1976)2SCC917

..... act 16 of 1964 the act took effect from 16 12 1963 it declares the judicial commissioner s court for goa daman and diu to be a high court for the purposes of articles 132 133 and 134 of the constitution vide section 3 section ..... goa daman and diu as corresponds to the cpc v of 1908 shall stand repealed as from the coming into force of this act in goa daman and diu provided that the repeal ..... costa 7 the .....

Meghalaya Plywoods Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

defect can be remedied only by legislation and not by judicial interpretation this principle of law finds its place in a apex court rendered in shrimati tarulata shyam and ors v commissioner of income tax west bengal reported in 1977 108itr345 sc law finds its place in a decision of the apex court rendered in shrimati tarulata shyam and ors v commissioner of aforementioned show cause notice dated 8 12 86 and for declaration that such show cause notice is illegal unjust unconstitutional and excises and salt act 1944 it is also noteworthy to high light that the factum of the illegal search and seizure related provisions of law under the central excises and salt act 1944 and the related rules thereunder and the opportunity had del 1989 42 elt338 sc 1983 elt 1342 sc air 1964 1 gau fb 1968 1scr148 1994 2 glr 239 gau infraction of the provisions of the law laid down under sections 100 103 105 1 110 165 210 and 353 of evaded central excise duties amounting to rs 64 13 941 70p should not be realised from the writ petitioner and as

Meghalaya Plywoods Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

defect can be remedied only by legislation and not by judicial interpretation this principle of law finds its place in a apex court rendered in shrimati tarulata shyam and ors v commissioner of income tax west bengal reported in 1977 108itr345 sc remedy and therefore people seeking for equity must approach the court as expeditiously as possible delay defeats equity is an accepted aforementioned show cause notice dated 8 12 86 and for declaration that such show cause notice is illegal unjust unconstitutional and civil supplies corporation ltd reported in air1997ker56 wherein the concerned high courts held that the writ petitions are not maintainable as notice under section 11a of the central excise and salt act 1944 read with rule 233 a of the central excise del 1989 42 elt338 sc 1983 elt 1342 sc air 1964 1 gau fb 1968 1scr148 1994 2 glr 239 gau from to day the central excise and salt act 1944 section 11a central excise rules 1944 rule 233a the writ peitition as seven eight times that is on 27 1 87 7 5 87 6 7 87 17 9 87 18 12

Mrs.N.Ratnakumari Vs. State of Odisha and Others

Court : Orissa

into force on 4th february 1995 in the state of goa himanchal pradesh and all the union territories and thereafter it no to be entertained when a person is committed to judicial custody or police custody by the competent court by an completion of medical treatment the requisition was made to the commissioner of police visakhapatnam city to provide escort party on 17 b so also complaint can be filed in the concerned court at place a or at place b and the court a period of two weeks it is indicated in the affidavit that the i o was very apprehensive to secure the into account and it is only if and when the high court is satisfied that prima facie there is something patently areas than one a continuing offence means that if an act or omission on the part of the accused constitutes an respects any state to which it applies be amended or repealed by an act of the legislature of the state thus pradesh it is the further case of the petitioner that section 13 2 iv of the 1995 a p toho act are concerned none of the offences carries punishment more than 7 years and as such section 41 cr p c has

Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Advocate Vs. Daler Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

the court this view has been reiterated in state of goa v sanjay thakran 2007 3 scc 755 and chandrappa v one hand and acquittal on the other the preponderance of judicial opinion of this court is that there is no substantial the village and accused challenged the same before the deputy commissioner sangrur it was set aside by the orders of deputy that is not to be not looked into by this court when the order regarding summoning of accused under that act the material evidence or has ignored material documents like dying declaration report of ballistic experts etc the appellate court is competent ma of 2012 o m 10 view adopted by the high court is a reasonable one and the conclusion reached by of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribes prevention of atrocities act hereinafter referred to as the sc st act aggrieved against section 3 of the sc st act the order qua sections 323 and 506 of ipc kumar virender 2013 07 19 k mansuri v state of gujarat 2002 1 rcr criminal 748 held that where in a case two views are possible

Sudarshan Plywood Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

the issuance of the show cause notice by numerous quasi judicial orders passed by the cegat collector appeals assistant collector from ayrshire punman motor services and d m rihie v the commissioner of inland revenue 1929 14 tax case 754 at 763 prevent miscarriage of justice the full court of the family court upheld his decision out of the total eight allegations made for the purposes of analogy only column 9 contains the declaration as to the nature and extent of the expenses without ble mr justice j s khehar chief justice of uttarakhand high court and shri p p rao senior advocate was examining of the bombay high com considered different provisions of the act and the rules and pointed out the once the price of section 35a and proviso to sub section 3 of section 35e would clearly reveal that the power under section 11a eleven appeals order 65 86 58 86 annx j pg 72 86 after de novo 179 adjudication annx jj pg 183

M.i. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in : (2008)117TTJLuck42

passed by the ld cit a who is a quasi judicial authority is not a reasoned order she has confirmed the assessing officer was to refer the matter to the chief commissioner as provided under sub section 2 in any case invoking a set procedure as laid down by hon ble supreme court in gkn driveshafts india ltd v ito 259 itr 19 supported enlarged or strengthened by subsequent material no outside material affidavit could be imported to throw light on such reasons for power to decide the matter before it hon ble kerala high court in k v kader haji deed v cit clarified has been rightly added under section 68 of the it act in his order and reports the ao has distinguished the merits the learned d r submitted that in spite of repealed notices and opportunities assessee did not produce the books of the assessment but as the initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 148 1 are bad in law therefore reassessment so framed marg lucknow which was under construction at the relevant time 7 without prejudice to all the above grounds of appeal and