Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: negative easement Page 1 of about 349 results (0.009 seconds)Indian Easements Act, 1882 Complete Act
Title: Indian Easements Act, 1882
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....which cannot be acquired by prescription Section18 - Customary easements Section19 - Transfer of dominant heritage passes easement Chapter 3 Section20 - Rules controlled by contract or title Section21 - Bar to use unconnected with enjoyment Section22 - Exercise of easement. Confinement of exercise of easement Section23 - Right to alter mode of enjoyment Section24 - Right to do acts to secure enjoyment Section25 - Liability for expenses necessary for preservation of easements Section26 - Liability for damage from want of repair Section27 - Servient owner not bound to do anything Section28 - Extent of easements Section29 - Increase of easement Section30 - Partition of dominant heritage Section31 - Obstruction in case of excessive user Chapter 4 Section32 - Right to enjoyment without disturbance Section33 - Suit for disturbance of easement Section34 - When cause of action arises for removal of support Section35 - Injunction to restrain disturbance Section36 - Abatement of obstruction of easement Chapter 5 Section37 - Extinction by dissolution of right of servient owner Section38 - Extinction by release Section39 - Extinction by revocation Section40 -.....
List Judgments citing this sectionThe Limitation Act, 1963 Complete Act
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....31-8-1967).2 Orissa Act 24 of 1967, S 3 (w.e.f. 31-8-1967). SECTION 29: SAVINGS (1) Nothing in this Act shall affect section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872). (2) Where any special or local, law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special or local law, the provisions contained in sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only in so far as, and to the extent to which, they are not expressly excluded by such special or local law. (3) Save as otherwise provided in any law for the time being in force with respect to marriage and divorce, nothing in this Act shall apply to any suit or other proceeding under any such law. (4) Sections 25 and 26 and the definition of "easement" in section 2 shall not apply to cases arising in the territories to which the Indian Easements Act, 1882 (5 of 1882) may for the time being extend. SECTION 30: PROVISION FOR SUITS, ETC., FOR WHICH.....
List Judgments citing this sectionLimitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Part IV
Title: Acquisition of Ownership by Possession
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....person making or authorising the same to be made. STATE AMENDMENT 1[Orissa Section 25 is repealed]. _______________________ 1. Vide Orissa Act 24 of 1967, Section 3 (w.e.f. 31-8-1967). Section 26 - Exclusion in favour of reversioner of serIvent tenement Where any land or water upon, over or from, which any easement has been enjoyed or derived has been held under or by virtue of any interest for life or in terms of years exceeding three years from the granting thereof the time of the enjoyment of such easement during the continuance of such interest or term shall be excluded in the computation of the period to twenty years in case the claim is, within three years next after the determination of such interests or term resisted by the person entitled on such determination to the said land or water. STATE AMENDMENT 1[Orissa Section 26 is repealed]. _____________________ 1. Vide Orissa Act 24 of 1967, Section 3 (w.e.f. 31-8-1967). Section 27 - Extinguishment of right to property At the determination of the period hereby limited to any person for instituting a suit for possession of any property, his right to such property shall be extinguished.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLimitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Section 25
Title: Acquisition of Easement by Prescription
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....(1) belongs to the Government that sub-section shall be read as if for the words "twenty years" the words "thirty years" were substituted. Explanation:--Nothing is an interruption within the meaning of this section, unless where there is an actual discontinuance of the possession or enjoyment by reason of an obstruction by the act of some person other than the claimant, and unless such obstruction is submitted to or acquiesced in for one year after the claimant has notice thereof and of the person making or authorising the same to be made. STATE AMENDMENT 1[Orissa Section 25 is repealed]. _______________________ 1. Vide Orissa Act 24 of 1967, Section 3 (w.e.f. 31-8-1967).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 5
Title: The Extinction, Suspension and Revival of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....to B, and lawfully imposes an easement on the land in favour of C in accordance with the provisions of section 10. The land is sold to D in satisfaction of the mortgage-debt. The easement is not thereby extinguished. Section 38 - Extinction by release An easement is extinguished when the dominant owner releases it, expressly or impliedly, to the servient owner. Such release can be made only in the circumstances and to the extent in and to which the dominant owner can alienate the dominant heritage. An easement may be released as to part only of the servient heritage. Explanation I.--An easement is impliedly released-- (a) where the dominant owner expressly authorises an act of a permanent nature to be done on the servient heritage, the necessary consequence of which is to prevent his future enjoyment of the easement, and such act is done in pursuance of such authority; (b) where any permanent alteration is made in the dominant heritage of such a nature as to show that the dominant owner intended to cease to enjoy the easement in future. Explanation II.--Mere non-user of an easement is not an implied release within the meaning of this section. Illustrations .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 2
Title: The Imposition, Acquisition and Transfer of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....sale took effect. A is entitled to the light, and B cannot build on the land so as to obstruct such light. (g) A the owner of a house, sells IS a factor)' built on adjoining land, B is entitled, as against A, to pollute the air, when necessary, with smoke and vapours from the factory. (h) A, the owner of two adjoining houses, Y and Z, sells Y to B, and retains Z. B is entitled to the benefit of all gutters and drains common to the two houses and necessary for enjoying Y as it was enjoyed when the sale took effect, and A is entitled to the benefit of all the gutters and drains common to the two houses and necessary for enjoying Z as it was enjoyed when the sale look effect. (i) A, the owner of two adjoining buildings, sells one to B, retaining the other. B is entitled to a right to lateral support from A's building, and A is entitled to a right to lateral support from B's building. (j) A, the owner of two adjoining buildings, sells one to B and the other to C. C is entitled to lateral support from B's building, and B is entitled to lateral support from C's building. (k) A grants lands to ti for the purpose of building a house thereon. B is entitled to such amount of.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 3
Title: The Incidents of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....of his mill. He cannot thereby increase his right to divert water. (b) A has acquired an easement to pollute a stream by carrying on a manufacture on its banks by which a certain quantity of foul matter is discharged into it. A extends his works and thereby increases the quantity discharged. He is responsible to the lower riparian owners for injury done by such increase. (c) A as the owner of a farm, has a right to lake for the purpose of manuring his farm: leaves which have fallen from the trees on B's land. A buys a field and unites it to his farm. A is not thereby entitled to take leaves to manure this fields. Section 30 - Partition of dominant heritage Where a dominant heritage is divided between two or more persons, the easement becomes annexed to each of the shares, but not so as to increase substantially the burden on the servient heritage: Provided that such annexation is consistent with the terms of the instrument, decree or revenue proceeding (if any) under which the division was made, and in the case of prescriptive rights, with the user during the prescriptive period. Illustrations (a) A house to which a right of way by a particular path is annexed.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 1
Title: Of Easements Generally
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....The right of every owner of upper land that water naturally rising in or falling on such land, and not passing in defined channels, shall be allowed by the owner of adjacent lower land to run naturally thereto. (j) The right of every owner of land abutting on a natural stream, lake or pond to use and consume its water for drinking, household purposes and watering his cattle and sheep and the right of every such owner to use and consume the water for irrigating such land, and for the purposes of any manufactory situate thereon, provided that he does not thereby cause material injury to other like owner. Explanation.--A natural stream is a stream, whether permanent or intermittent, tide or tideless, on the surface of land or underground, which flows by the operation of nature only and in a natural and known course.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 13
Title: Easements of Necessity and Quasi Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....sale took effect. A is entitled to the light, and B cannot build on the land so as to obstruct such light. (g) A the owner of a house, sells IS a factor)' built on adjoining land, B is entitled, as against A, to pollute the air, when necessary, with smoke and vapours from the factory. (h) A, the owner of two adjoining houses, Y and Z, sells Y to B, and retains Z. B is entitled to the benefit of all gutters and drains common to the two houses and necessary for enjoying Y as it was enjoyed when the sale took effect, and A is entitled to the benefit of all the gutters and drains common to the two houses and necessary for enjoying Z as it was enjoyed when the sale look effect. (i) A, the owner of two adjoining buildings, sells one to B, retaining the other. B is entitled to a right to lateral support from A's building, and A is entitled to a right to lateral support from B's building. (j) A, the owner of two adjoining buildings, sells one to B and the other to C. C is entitled to lateral support from B's building, and B is entitled to lateral support from C's building. (k) A grants lands to ti for the purpose of building a house thereon. B is entitled to such amount of.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Chapter 4
Title: The Disturbance of Easements
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....the evidence of the easement, or by materially diminishing the value of the dominant heritage, is substantial damage within the meaning of this section and section 34. Explanation II.--Where the easement disturbed is a right to the free passage of light passing to the openings in a house, no damage is substantial within the meaning of this section unless it falls within the first Explanation, or interferes materially with the physical comfort of the plaintiff, or prevents him from carrying on his accustomed business in the dominant heritage as beneficially as he had done previous to instituting the suit, Explanation III--Where the easement disturbed is a right to the free passage of air to the openings in a house, damage is substantial within the meaning of this section if it interferes materially with the physical comfort of the plaintiff, though it is not injurious to his health. Illustrations (a) A places a permanent obstruction in a path over which B, as tenant of C's house, has a right of way. This is substantial damage to C, for it may affect the evidence of his reversionary right to the easement. (b) A, as owner of a house, has a right to walk along one side.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>