Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: mandated reporterSign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialBombay Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act, 1955, (Maharashtra) Preamble
Title: the Bombay Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act, 1955
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1955
THE BOMBAY JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS (REGULATION OF REPORTS) ACT, 1955 [Act No. 18 of 19551] [6th May, 1955] PREAMBLE An Act to regulate the publication of reports of judicial proceedings. WHEREAS it is necessary to regulate the publication of reports of judicial proceedings, so as to prevent the publica tion of obscene or indecent matter and other matters, the publication of which will not be in the public interest; It is hereby enacted in the Sixth Year of the Republic of India, as follows:- _________________ 1. For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Bombay Government Gazette, 1955, Part V, p. 3.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Law Reports Act, 1875 Preamble 1
Title: Indian Law Reports Act, 1875
State: Central
Year: 1875
THE INDIAN LAW REPORTS ACT, 1875 [ACT, No. 18 of 1875] [AS ON 1956] [13th October, 1875] PREAMBLE An Act for the improvement of Law Reports. [Preamble rep. by the A.O.1937.]
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Law Reports Act, 1875 Section 3
Title: Authority Given Only to Authorized Reports
State: Central
Year: 1875
No Court shall be bound to hear cited, or shall receive or treat as an authority binding on it, the report of any case {Subs.by Act 3 of 1951 for "decided on or after the said day by any High Court for a Part A State".}[decided by any High Court for a1[State], other than a report published under the authority of {The original words "the G.G.in C." have successively been amended by the Devolution Act, 1920 (38 of 1920), the A.O.1937 and the A.O.1950 to read as above.}[any State Government]. _________________________ 1. Substituted, for "Part A or Part B State" by 2 A.L.O. 1956.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Law Reports Act, 1875 Complete Act
Title: Indian Law Reports Act, 1875
State: Central
Year: 1875
Preamble1 - INDIAN LAW REPORTS ACT, 1875 Section1 - Short title Section2 - [Repealed] Section3 - Authority given only to authorized reports Section4 - Authority of judicial decisions
List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act, 1955, (Maharashtra) Section 3
Title: Restrictions on Publication of Reports of Judicial Proceedings
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1955
.....the names of the parties; and (2) the order of the Court; (c) in respect of any judicial proceedings in connection with an offence under sections 354, 366, 366A, 366B, 376, 377 or 498 of the Indian Penal Code, Penal Code, any particulars other than the following, that is to say:- (1) the name, occupation and address of the accused; and (2) the order of the Court, without disclosing the iden tity of, or giving any particulars calculated to lead to the identification of, any person who may have been a victim of the offence : Provided that, nothing in this section shall apply to the printing of any pleading, transcript of evidence or other document for use in connection with any judicial proceedings or the communication thereof to persons concerned in the proceedings or to the printing or publishing of any notice or report in pursuance of the directions of the Court or to the printing or publishing of any matter in a separate volume or part of any bona fide series of law reports or in any publication of a technical character bona fide intended for circulation among members of the legal or medical professions.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMaharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench & Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1986
.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court. Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication [deleted by Mah. Act No. 27 of 2008, and with the previous......State Government. w.e.f. 1.7.1987] [* * *] prescribed that such of that application referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. 3. Abolition of appeal from judgment or order of single Judge of High Court made in exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction.:- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the.....
List Judgments citing this sectionMaharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench and Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1986
.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court: Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication and with the previous approval of the State Government prescribe that such of the applications referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a Single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. SECTION 03: ABOLITION OF APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF SINGLE JUDGE OF HIGH COURT MADE IN EXERCISE OF ORIGINAL OR APPELLATE JURISDICTION (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the 28th December 1865 and in any other instrument.....
List Judgments citing this sectionArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 15
Title: Termination of Mandate and Substitution of Arbitrator
State: Central
Year: 1996
(1) In addition to the circumstances referred to in section 13 or section 14, the mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate (a) where he withdraws from office for any reason; or (b) by or pursuant to agreement of the parties (2) Where the mandate of an artibrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to the rules that were applicable to the appointment of the arbitrator being replaced. (3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where an arbitrator is replaced under sub-section (2) , any hearings previously held may be repeated at the discretion of the arbitral tribunal. (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, an order or ruling of the arbitral tribunal made prior to the replacement of an arbitrator under this section shall not b invalid solely because there has been a change in the composition of the arbitral tribunal.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 345
Title: Wrongful Confinement of Person for Whose Liberation Writ Has Been Issued
State: Central
Year: 1860
Whoever keeps any person in wrongful confinement, knowing that a writ for the liberation of that person has been duly issued, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years in addition to any term of imprisonment to which he may be liable under any other section of this Chapter.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Excise Act, 1965(Karnataka) Section 68D
Title: Excise Revenue to Be Paid Irrespective of Pendency of Any Writ Petition, Suit Etc
State: Karnataka
Year: 1965
Notwithstanding that a writ petition has been preferred before the High Court or a suit or other proceeding has been instituted in any Court or any appeal has been filed before any Court, the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal or the Excise Commissioner or a revision has been filed before the State Government, any sum due to the State Government under this Act as a result of demand or order made or passed by any officer or authority empowered in this behalf by or under this Act shall be payable in accordance with such demand or order.] _______________________________ 1. Sections 68B to 68D Inserted by Act 2 of 1995 w.e.f. 25.02.1995.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial