Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: lying in Page 1 of about 4,029 results (0.013 seconds)Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 372
Title: No Appeal to Lie Unless Otherwise Provided
State: Central
Year: 1973
No appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a Criminal Court except as provided for by this Code or by any other law for the time being in force. 1[Provided that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or imposing inadequate compensation, and such appeal shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction of such Court.] _______________________________ 1. Inserted vide Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act 2008 to be effective from 31.12.2009 vide Notification No. S.O. 3313(E) dated 30.12.2009.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 104
Title: Ordersfrom Which Appeal Lies
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....following orders, and save as otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or by any law for the time being in force, from no other orders:-- 1 [***] 2 [(ff) an order under section 35A;] 3 [(ffa) and order under section 91 or section 92 refusing leave to institute a suit of the nature referred to in section 91 or section 92, as the case may be;] (g) an order under section 95; (h) an order under any of the provisions of this Code imposing a fine or directing the arrest or detention in the civil prison of any person except where such arrest or detention is in execution of a decree; (i) any order made under rules from which an appeal is expressly allowed by rules: 2 [Provided that no appeal shall lie against any order specified in clause (ff) save on the ground that no order, or an order for the payment of a less amount, ought to have been made.] (2) No appeal shall lie from any order passed in appeal under this section. ________________ 1. Clause (a) to (f) omitted by Act 10 of 1940, section 49 and Schedule III. 2. Inserted by Act 9 of 1992, section 3. 3. Inserted by Act 104 of 1976, section 41 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 109
Title: Whenappeals Lie to the Supreme Court
State: Central
Year: 1908
1 [109. When appeals lie to the Supreme Court Subject to the provisions in Chapter IV of Part V of the Constitution and such rules as may, from time to time, be made by the Supreme Court regarding appeals from the Courts of India, and to the provisions hereinafter contained, an appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree of final order in a civil proceeding of a High Court, if the High Court certifies- (i) that the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance; and (ii) that in the opinion of the High Court the said question needs to be decided by the Supreme Court.] ________________ 1. Substituted by Act 46 of 1973, section 2, for former section 109 (w.e.f. 29-11-1973).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionOudh Laws Act, 1876 Section 9A
Title: When a Suit for Pre-emption Lies
State: Central
Year: 1876
{S.9A ins.by U.P.Act 15 of 1939, s.2.} No suit shall lie for enforcing a right of pre-emption under this Act in respect of a portion only of the property sold or foreclosed: Provided that, where the plaintiff has a right of pre-emption in respect of only a portion of the property sold or foreclosed, then notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any enactment a suit for the pre-emption of that portion only shall lie and the plaintiff shall have to pay the proportionate price or the proportionate amount due in respect of such mortgage for such portion of the property as the case may be.]
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPresidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 Section 94
Title: No Suit to Lie Upon Decree of Court
State: Central
Year: 1882
No suit shall lie on any decree of the Small Cause Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Hereditary Offices Act, 1874, (Maharashtra) Section 76
Title: No Appeal to Lie Save Where Specially Provided
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1874
No appeal shall lie from any order made under section 64, clause (e) 1* * * before final order nor from any order registering any fact specified under section 67, clauses (b), (c), (d) and (e) 1* * * where the effect of such order is merely to register the same facts as are already recorded in the existing registers kept according to law or under the orders of 2[the 3[State] Government]. _________________ 1. The words "of this Act" were repealed by the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1886 (Bom. 3 of 1886), Sch. B. This Schedule has been printed as an Appendix to the Bombay General Clauses, 1904 (Bom. 1 of 1904). 2. The words "the Provincial Government" were substituted for the word "Government" by the Adaptation of Indian Laws Order in Council. 3. This word was substituted for the word "Provincial" by the Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Corneal Grafting Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Section 6
Title: Authority to Remove Eyes, when Body is Lying in Approved Institution
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1957
In the case of a body lying in an approved institution any authority for removal of eyes under this Act may be given on behalf of the person having the control or management of the approved institution by any officer or person designated in that behalf by the first mentioned person.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Anatomy Act, 1949, (Maharashtra) Section 5D
Title: Authority to Remove Body, Etc., when Body is Lying in Approved Institution
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1949
In the case of a body lying in any hospital, nursing home or other institution, any authority for the removal of the body or any part thereof under section 5-B may be given on behalf of the person having the control or management thereof by any officer or person designated for that purpose by the first mentioned person.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Treasure Trove Act, 1962 Section 16
Title: Decision of Deputy Commissioner Final and No Suit to Lie Against Him for Acts Done Bone Fide
State: Karnataka
Year: 1962
No decision passed or act done by the Deputy Commissioner under this Act shall be called in question by any Civil Court, and no suit or other proceeding shall lie against him for anything done in good faith in exercise of the powers conferred by this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Evidence Act 1872 Section 102
Title: On Whom Burden of Proof Lies
State: Central
Year: 1872
The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. Illustrations (a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B's father. If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession. Therefore the burden of proof is on A. (b) A sues B for money due on a bond. The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved. Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>