Judicial Review - Bare Acts

GOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Section 5

Title: Appeals to Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Judicial Commissioner's Court

State: Central

Year: 1964

Subject to any rules made under Article 145 or any other law as to the time within which appeals to the Supreme Court are to be entered, an appeal shall lie to that Court from a judgment, decree or final order of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, under the provisions of Article 132 or Article 133, or from a judgment, final order or sentence of such Court under the provisions of Article 134: PROVIDED that an appeal may be preferred within ninety days from the date of passing of this Act from a judgment, decree, final order or sentence passed or made by the Judicial Commissioners Court before that date.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Coast Guard Act, 1978 Chapter XI

Title: Judicial Review of Proceedings of Coast Guard Courts

State: Central

Year: 1978

.....of being heard either in person or through a legal practitioner or an officer of the Coast Guard. Section 118 - Consideration by the Director-General (1) On receipt of the report and recommendations, if any, under section 117, the Director-General shall in all cases of sentences of death, and in all cases where the Coast Guard Court is convened by the Central Government, and may, in other cases, transmit the proceedings and the report to the Central Government together with such recommendations as he may deem fit to make. (2) Nothing in section 117 or this section shall authorise the Chief Law Officer or the Director-General to make any recommendation for setting aside, or the Central Government to set aside, an order of acquittal passed under this Act.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Coast Guard Act, 1978 Section 117

Title: Judicial Review by the Chief Law Officer

State: Central

Year: 1978

(1) All proceedings of trials by Coast Guard Courts shall be reviewed by the Chief Law Officer either on his own motion or on application made to him within the prescribed time by any person aggrieved by any sentence or finding, and the Chief Law Officer shall transmit the report of such review together with such recommendations as may appear to him just and proper to the Director-General for his consideration and for such action as the Director-General may think fit, (2) Where any person aggrieved has made an application under sub-section (1) the Chief Law Officer may, if the circumstances of the case so require, give him an opportunity of being heard either in person or through a legal practitioner or an officer of the Coast Guard.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Navy Act, 1957 Chapter XV

Title: Judicial Review of Courts-material Proceedings

State: Central

Year: 1957

.....of being heard either in person or through a legal practitioner or an officer of the Indian Navy. Section 161 - Consideration by the Chief of the Naval Staff (1) On receipt of the report and recommendations if any, under section 160, the Chief of the Naval Staff shall in all cases of capital sentence and in all cases where the court-martial is ordered by the President, and may in other cases transmit the proceedings and the report to the Central Government together with such recommendations as he may deem fit to make. (2) Nothing in section 160 or this section shall authorise the Judge Advocate General of the Navy or the Chief of the Naval Staff to make any recommendation for setting aside, or the Central Government to set aside, an order of acquittal passed under this Act.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Navy Act, 1957 Section 160

Title: Judicial Review by the Judge Advocate General of the Navy

State: Central

Year: 1957

(1) All proceedings of trials by court-martial or by disciplinary courts shall be reviewed by the Judge Advocate General of the Navy either on his own motion or on application made to him within the prescribed time by any person aggrieved by any sentence or finding, and the Judge Advocate General of the Navy shall transmit the report of such review together with such recommendations as may appear just and proper to the Chief of the Naval Staff for his consideration and for such action as the Chief of the Naval Staff may think fit. (2) Where any person aggrieved has made an application under sub-section (1), the Judge Advocate General of the Navy may, if the circumstances of the case so require, give him an opportunity of being heard either in person or through a legal practitioner or an officer of the Indian Navy.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

GOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Complete Act

Title: GOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED]

State: Central

Year: 1964

Preamble1 - GOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964 Section1 - Short title and commencement Section2 - Definition Section3 - Declaration of Goa, Daman and Diu Judicial Commissioner's Court as High Court for certain purposes Section4 - Appeals to the Supreme Court not to be barred on account of judgment, etc., being of a single Judge Section5 - Appeals to Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Judicial Commissioner's Court Section6 - Exceptions and modifications subject to which the provisions of Chapter V of Part VI of the Constitution apply to the Judicial Commissioner's Court Section7 - Appeals to lie to the Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Tribunal de Relacao Section8 - Repeal of section 7 of Act 1 of 1962 Repealing Act1 - JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION LAWS (REPEAL) ACT 2001

List Judgments citing this section

GOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Repealing Act 1

Title: JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION LAWS (REPEAL) ACT 2001

State: Central

Year: 1964

.....Bombay High Court (Letters Patent) Act, 1866. 1866 25 The Unclaimed Deposits Act, 1866. 1867 16 The Acting Judges Act, 1867. 1869 13 The Procedure of the High Court for Uttar Pradesh. 1870 5 The Unclaimed Deposits Act, 1870. 1877 4 The Presidency Magistrates (Court-fees) Act, 1877. 1919 9 The Punjab Courts (Supplementing) Act, 1919. 1937 25 The Federal Court Act, 1937. 1948 1 The Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947. 1849 Constituent Assembly Act V The Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949, 1949 Rajasthan Ord. XV The Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949. 1950 15 The Judicial Commissioners' Courts (Declaration as High Courts)Act, 1950. 1950 41 The Bhopal and Vindhya Pradesh (Courts) Act, 1950. 1952 72 The Mysore High Court (Extension of Jurisdiction to Coorg) Act, 1952. 1953 44 The Manipur Court-fees (Amendment and Validation) Act,.....

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Judicial Commissioners Courts (Declaration as High Courts) Act, 1950[Repealed] Repealing Act 1

Title: Judicial Administration Laws (Repeal) Act 2001

State: Central

Year: 1950

.....Bombay High Court (Letters Patent) Act, 1866. 1866 25 The Unclaimed Deposits Act, 1866. 1867 16 The Acting Judges Act, 1867. 1869 13 The Procedure of the High Court for Uttar Pradesh. 1870 5 The Unclaimed Deposits Act, 1870. 1877 4 The Presidency Magistrates (Court-fees) Act, 1877. 1919 9 The Punjab Courts (Supplementing) Act, 1919. 1937 25 The Federal Court Act, 1937. 1948 1 The Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947. 1849 Constituent Assembly Act V The Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949, 1949 Rajasthan Ord. XV The Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949. 1950 15 The Judicial Commissioners' Courts (Declaration as High Courts)Act, 1950. 1950 41 The Bhopal and Vindhya Pradesh (Courts) Act, 1950. 1952 72 The Mysore High Court (Extension of Jurisdiction to Coorg) Act, 1952. 1953 44 The Manipur Court-fees (Amendment and Validation).....

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Bombay Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act, 1955, (Maharashtra) Section 3

Title: Restrictions on Publication of Reports of Judicial Proceedings

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1955

.....the names of the parties; and (2) the order of the Court; (c) in respect of any judicial proceedings in connection with an offence under sections 354, 366, 366A, 366B, 376, 377 or 498 of the Indian Penal Code, Penal Code, any particulars other than the following, that is to say:- (1) the name, occupation and address of the accused; and (2) the order of the Court, without disclosing the iden tity of, or giving any particulars calculated to lead to the identification of, any person who may have been a victim of the offence : Provided that, nothing in this section shall apply to the printing of any pleading, transcript of evidence or other document for use in connection with any judicial proceedings or the communication thereof to persons concerned in the proceedings or to the printing or publishing of any notice or report in pursuance of the directions of the Court or to the printing or publishing of any matter in a separate volume or part of any bona fide series of law reports or in any publication of a technical character bona fide intended for circulation among members of the legal or medical professions.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

JUDICIAL OFFICERS' PROTECTION ACT, 1850 Section 1

Title: Non-liability to suit of officers acting judicially, for official acts done in good faith, and of officers executing warrants and orders

State: Central

Year: 1850

No Judge, Magistrate, Justice of the Peace, Collector or other person acting judicially shall be liable to be sued in any Civil Court for any act done or ordered to be done by him in the discharge of his judicial duty, whether or not within the limits of his jurisdiction: PROVIDED that he at the time in good faith, believed himself to have jurisdiction to do or order the act complained of; and no officer of any Court or other person, bound to execute the lawful warrants or orders of any such Judge, Magistrate, Justice of the Peace, Collector or other person acting judicially shall be liable to be sued in any Civil Court, for the execution of any warrant or order, which he would be bound to execute, if within the jurisdiction of the person issuing the same.

View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section

Bare Act Search Results