Bare Act Search Results
The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) Section 9
Title: Sections 6, 7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form.—Nothing contained in
State: Tamil Nadu
Year: 2000
9. Sections 6, 7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form.-Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInformation Technology Act, 2000 Section 9
Title: SECTIONS 6, 7 AND 8 NOT TO CONFER RIGHT TO INSIST DOCUMENT SHOULD BE ACCEPTED IN ELECTRONIC FORM Nothing contained in
State: Central
Year: 2000
SECTION 09: SECTIONS 6, 7 AND 8 NOT TO CONFER RIGHT TO INSIST DOCUMENT SHOULD BE ACCEPTED IN ELECTRONIC FORM Nothing contained in Sections 6 - , Section 7 - and
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInformation Technology Act, 2000 Section 9
Title: Sections 6, 7 and 8 Not to Confer Right to Insist Document Should Be Accepted in Electronic Form
State: Central
Year: 2000
Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right upon any person to insist that any Ministry or Department of the Central Government or the State Government or any authority or body
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBrief the judgments behind these acts
The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 9
Title: Sections 6, 7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form
State: Delhi
Year: 2000
Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right upon any person to insist that any Ministry or Department of the Central Government or the State Government or any authority or body
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 Section 9
Title: Sections 6,7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form
State: Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
Year: 2000
Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right upon any person to insist that any Ministry or Department of the Central Government or the State Government or any authority or body
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe IT ACT 2000 Section 9
Title: Sections 6,7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form
State: Tripura
Year: 2000
Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right upon any person to insist that any Ministry or Department of the Central Government or the State Government or any authority or body
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 9
Title: Sections 6, 7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form
State: Haryana
Year: 2000
Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right upon any person to insist that any Ministry or Department of the Central Government or the State Government or any authority or body
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSecurities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 Rule 19
Title: RULE 19: REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE LISTING OF SECURITIES ON A RECOGNISED STOCK EXCHANGE
State: Central
Year: 1957
the discharge of members of stock exchange on split, consolidation and renewal receipts as good and sufficient without insisting on the discharge of the registered holders]; (c) when documents are lodged for sub-division or consolidation25[or renewal] through
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Maharashtra Employment Guarantee Act, 1977 Section 17
Title: POWER TO MAKE RULES The power to make rules under this Act shall be exercisable by the State Government by notification
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1977
village, by giving an application indicating the details mentioned in Form No. 1. The registering authority need not insist that the application should be in the prescribed form provided all the details mentioned in Form No. 1.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionEradication of Unfair Activities at Pandharpur Temples (for Providing Better Facilities for Worship) Act, 1980 Section 3
Title: Punishment for preventing or discouraging persons from entering or worshipping etc. at Pandharpur at Temples
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1980
religious service or ceremony therein, during the period the temple is open to the visitors; (b) demands or insists for any dakshina, offering, donation, gift, fee or other charge whatsoever from any such person for darshana or
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI research tools - 7 days free