Bare Act Search Results
The Gujarat Court-fees Act, 2004 Section 40
Title: No documents which ought to bear stamp under this Act shall be of any
State: Gujarat
Year: 2004
documents Inadvertently validity, unless and until it is properly stamped. received. But, if any such document is through mistake or
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Non-trading Corporations Act, 1959, (Maharashtra) Section 13
Title: Rectification of Name of Corporations
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1959
If, through inadvertence or otherwise, a corporation on its first registration or on its registration by a new name, is registered
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAndhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 Section 66
Title: REFUND OF FEE PAID BY MISTAKE OR INADVERTENCE The fee paid by mistake or inadvertence shall be ordered to be refunded
State: Central
Year: 1956
SECTION 66: REFUND OF FEE PAID BY MISTAKE OR INADVERTENCE The fee paid by mistake or inadvertence shall be ordered to be refunded.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBrief the judgments behind these acts
Pondicherry Courtfees and Suits Valuation Act, 1972 Section 59
Title: Refund of fee paid by mistake or inadvertence The fee paid by mistake or inadvertence shall be ordered to be refunded
State: Central
Year: 1972
SECTION 59 : Refund of fee paid by mistake or inadvertence The fee paid by mistake or inadvertence shall be ordered to be refunded.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe PUDUCHERRY COURT FEES AND SUITS VALUATION ACT, 1972 Section 59
Title: Refund of fee paid by mistake or inadvertence. - The fee paid by mistake or Section 60 - inadvertence shall be ordered
State: Pondicherry
Year: 1973
59. Refund of fee paid by mistake or inadvertence. - The fee paid by mistake or Section 60 - inadvertence shall be ordered to be refunded
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Court Fees Act 1959 Section 40
Title: Stamping documents inadvertently received: No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any
State: Central
Year: 1959
SECTION 40: Stamping documents inadvertently received: No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any validity, unless
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCourt Fees Act, 1870 Section 28
Title: STAMPING DOCUMENTS INADVERTENTLY RECEIVED No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any
State: Central
Year: 1870
SECTION 28: STAMPING DOCUMENTS INADVERTENTLY RECEIVED No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any validity, unless
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Court Fees Act, 1959 Section 40
Title: STAMPING DOCUMENTS INADVERTENTLY RECEIVED No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1959
SECTION 40: STAMPING DOCUMENTS INADVERTENTLY RECEIVED No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any validity, unless
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Court-Fee ACT, 1870 Section 28
Title: Stamping documents inadvertently received.-No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any
State: Delhi
Year: 1870
28. Stamping documents inadvertently received.-No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any validity, unless and
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPondicherry Courtfees and Suits Valuation Act, 1972 Section 5
Title: Fees on documents inadvertently received When a document on which the whole or any part of the fee prescribed by this
State: Central
Year: 1972
SECTION 5 : Fees on documents inadvertently received When a document on which the whole or any part of the fee prescribed by this Act
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI research tools - 7 days free