Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: having been nominatedSign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialPresidential and Vice-presidential Elections Act, 1952 Section 19
Title: Grounds for Which a Candidate Other Than the Returned Candidate May He Declared to Have Been Elected
State: Central
Year: 1952
If any person who has lodged an election petition has, in addition to calling in question the election of the returned candidate, claimed a declaration that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected and the Supreme Court is of opinion that in fact the petitioner or such other candidate received a majority of the valid votes, the Supreme Court shall, after declaring the election of the returned candidate to be void, declare the petitioner or such other candidate, as the case may be, to have been duly elected : Provided that the petitioner or such other candidate shall not be declared to be duly elected if it is proved that the election of such candidate would have been void if he had been the returned candidate and a petition had been presumed calling in question his election.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNational Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 Section 27
Title: Management to Continue to Vest in the Custodian Until Alternative Arrangements Have Been Made
State: Central
Year: 1980
Notwithstanding the vesting under this Act of the undertakings of the Company in the Central Government or an existing, or a new, Government company.-- (a) the Custodian who has been managing the affairs of such undertaking before the dale on which the undertaking had so vested shall, until alternative arrangements have been made by the Central Government or, as the case may be, such Government company, for the management of such undertakings continue to manage the affairs of the undertakings, as if the Custodian had been authorised by the Central Government or, as the case may be, such Government company, to manage such undertakings; (b) the Custodian or any person authorised by him for this purpose shall, until alternative arrangements have been made by the Central Government or, as the case may be, such Government company, continue to be authorised to operate, in relation to the undertakings of the Company, any account of such undertakings in any bank as if the Custodian or the person authorised by him had been authorised by the Central Government or such Government company to operate such account.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionTea Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Sick Tea Units) Act, 1985 Section 25
Title: Management to Continue to Vest in Certain Persons Until Alternative Arrangements Have Been Made
State: Central
Year: 1985
Notwithstanding the vesting under this Act of a sick tea unit of any tea company in the Tea Trading Corporation- (a) any person who has been managing the affairs of such sick tea unit before the date on which that unit had so vested shall, until alternative arrangements have been made by the Tea Trading Corporation for the management of such unit, continue to manage the affairs of the unit , as it such person had been authorised by the Tea Trading Corporation, to manage such unit; (b) such person shall, until alternative arrangements have been made by the Tea Trading Corporation, continue to be authorised to operate, in relation to the sick tea unit of such tea company, any account of such unit in any bank as if he had been authorised by the Tea Trading Corporation to operate such account.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionJute Companies (Nationalisation) Act, 1980. Section 26
Title: Management to Continue to Vest in Certain Persons Until Alternative Arrangements Have Been Made
State: Central
Year: 1980
Notwithstanding the vesting under this Act of the Undertakings of any jute company in the Central Government or the Jute Manufactures Corporation-- (a) any person who has been managing the affairs of such undertakings before the date on which the undertakings had so vested shall, until alternative arrangements have been made by the Central Government or, as the case may be, the Jute Manufactures Corporation, for he management of such undertakings, continue to manage the affairs of the undertakings, or, as the case may be, the Jute Manufactures Corporation, to manage such undertakings; (b) such person shall, until alternative arrangements have been made by the Central Government, or, as the case may be, the Jute Manufactures Corporation, continue to be authorised to operate, in relation to the undertakings of such jute company, any account of such undertakings in any bank as if he had been authorised by the Central Government or the Jute Manufactures Corporation to operate such account.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Section 20
Title: Grounds on Which a Candidate Other Than the Returned Candidate May Be Declared to Have Been Elected
State: Karnataka
Year: 1993
Section 20 - Grounds on which a candidate other than the returned candidate may be declared to have been elected (1) If any person who has filed an election petition has, in addition to calling in question the election of the returned candidate, claims a declaration that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected and the1[Civil Judge (Junior Division)] is of opinion,- (a) that in fact the petitioner or such other candidate received a majority of the valid votes; or (b) that but for the votes obtained by the returned candidate by corrupt practices the petitioner or such other candidate would have obtained a majority of the valid votes, the1[Civil Judge (Junior Division)] shall after declaring the election of the returned candidate to be void declare the petitioner or such other candidate, as the case may be, to have been duly elected. (2) The decision of the1[Civil Judge (Junior Division)] shall be final. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 29 of 1997 w.e.f. 20.10.1997.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionRepresentation of the People Act, 1951 Section 101
Title: Grounds for Which a Candidate Other Than the Returned Candidate May Be Declared to Have Been Elected
State: Central
Year: 1951
If any person who has lodged a petition has, in addition to calling in question the election of the returned candidate, claimed a declaration that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected and1[the High Court] is of opinion- (a) that in fact the petitioner or such other candidate received a majority of the valid votes; or (b) that but for the votes obtained by the returned candidate by corrupt2[***] practices the petitioner or such other candidate would have obtained a majority of the valid voles, 1[the High Court] shall, after declaring the election of the returned candidate to be void declare the petitioner or such other candidate, as the case may be, to have been duly elected. ______________________ 1. Substituted by Act 47 of 1966, Section 42, for "the Tribunal w.e.f. 14-12-1966. 2. The words "or illegal" omitted by Act 27 of 1956, Section 56.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCompanies Act, 1956 Section 370A
Title: Provisions as to Certain Loanswhich Could Not Have Been Made if Sections 369 and 370 Were in Force
State: Central
Year: 1956
.....enforce the repayment of the loan made or, as the case may be, revoke theguarantee given or the security provided, notwithstanding any agreement to thecontrary: Providedthat the period of six months within which the company is required by thissection to enforce the repayment of the loan or to revoke the guarantee orsecurity, may be extended - 3 [***] (b)in the case of a loan, guarantee or security under section 370, by a specialresolution of the company.] _______________________ 1. Inserted by Act 65 of 1960, Section 136 (w.e.f.28-12-1960). 2. Thewords "section 369 or" omitted by Act 53 of 2000,Section 165 (w.e.f. 13-12-2000). 3. Clause (a) omitted by Act 53 of 2000,Section 165 (w.e.f. 13-12-2000).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionObstructions in Fairways Act, 1881 Section 11
Title: Certain Action of the Government Previous to Passing of This Act to Be Deemed to Have Been Taken Hereunder
State: Central
Year: 1881
Whenever any obstruction in a fairway leading to a port in { Subs.by the Adaptation of Laws (No 2) Order, 1956 for "a Part A State or a Part C State".} [the territories which immediately before the 1st November, 1956, were comprised in Part A States and Part C States] has been removed or destroyed, or whenever the creation of any such obstruction has been regulated or prohibited, by an order of the Central Government or a State Government, previous to the passing of this Act, such removal, destruction, regulation or prohibition shall be deemed to have been effected under this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionDisputed Elections (Prime Minister and Speaker) Act, 1977 Section 19
Title: Grounds for Which a Candidate Other Than the Returned Candidate May Be Declared to Have Been Elected
State: Central
Year: 1977
If any person who has lodged a petition has, in addition to calling in question the election of the returned candidate, claimed a declaration that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected and the Authority is of opinion-- (a) that in fact the petitioner or such other candidate received a majority of the valid votes; or (b) that but for the votes obtained by the returned candidate by corrupt practices the petitioner or such other candidate would have obtained a majority of the valid votes, the Authority shall after declaring the election of the returned candidate to be void declare the petitioner or such other candidate, as the case may be, to have been duly elected.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Section 22
Title: Grounds for Which a Candidate Other Than the Returned Candidate May Be Declared to Have Been Elected
State: Karnataka
Year: 1966
If any person who has lodged a petition has, in addition to calling in question the election of the returned candidate, claimed a declaration that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected, and the Munsiff is of opinion,- (a) that in fact the petitioner or such other candidate received a majority of the valid votes; or (b) that but for the votes obtained by the returned candidate by corrupt practices the petitioner or such other candidate would have obtained a majority of the valid votes, the Munsiff shall after declaring the election of the returned candidate to be void declare the petitioner or such other candidate, as the case may be, to have been duly elected.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial