Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the mizoram state agricultural produce marketing development and regulation act 2008 Page 1 of about 967 results (0.226 seconds)

United States Vs. United Foods, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... beyond the collection and disbursement of advertising funds, there are no marketing orders that regulate how mushrooms may be produced and sold, no exemption from the antitrust laws, and nothing preventing individual producers from making their own marketing decisions. ..... see ante, at 415 ("greater regula- 421 tion of the mushroom market might have been implemented under the agricultural marketing agreement act of 1937"); 7 u. s. c. ..... it filed a petition challenging the assessment with the secretary of agriculture, and the united states filed an enforcement action in the district court. ..... the act authorizes the secretary of agriculture to establish a mushroom council to pursue the statute's goals. ..... the court, in my view, disregards controlling precedent, fails properly to analyze the strength of the relevant regulatory and commercial speech interests, and introduces into first amendment law an unreasoned legal principle that may well pose an obstacle to the development of beneficial forms of economic regulation. ..... , dissenting) (noting that "the extent to which the act eliminates competition varies among different marketing orders"). ..... to fund its programs, the act allows the council to impose mandatory assessments upon handlers of fresh mushrooms in an amount not to exceed one cent per pound of mushrooms produced or imported. ..... although greater regulation of the mushroom market might have been implemented under the agricultural marketing agreement act of 1937, 50 stat. .....

Shivaji S/O Krishnaji Bhalerao Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through th ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR666; 2009(1)BomCR142; (2008)110BOMLR3096

..... by order dated 23-03-2007 under section 14(3) of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) act, 1963, (hereafter referred to as 'act'), the term of the committee was extended from 01-04-2007 to 30-09-2007. ..... that, this period of six months may be extended, from time to time by the state government, in exceptional circumstances, to a period not exceeding one year in the aggregate, by notification in the official gazette, for reasons, which shall be stated in the notification.section 15a(1a) reads as under:notwithstanding anything contained in clause (b) of sub section (1) as it stood before the commencement of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) (amendment and validation) act, 1985, where the administrator has begun to manage the affairs of any committee but election to such committee has not been held ..... 4 which states that the provisional voters list was published on 16-05-2008. .....

Hiralal Son of Fattechand Gandhe and Nandkumar Son of Hiralal Gandhe V ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR592; 2008(5)BomCR40; 2008(6)MhLj431

..... dave, learned counsel for appellants contends that the provisions of section 55 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) act, 1963 (for short, the 'apmc act') are clear-cut and unambiguous and no suit can be filed against the committee or any member acting under the direction of market committee in absence of statutory notice. ..... in view of the provisions of sections 55 and 57 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1963 ousting the jurisdiction of civil court the courts below could try and decree the instant suit?2 ..... was licence holder operating in agricultural produce market committee and thereafter it is defendant no ..... from defendants as worth of agricultural produce sold by him. ..... submits that if at all there was any transaction between the parties, it admittedly took place in market yard and defendants acting on behalf of the market committee and, therefore, issuance of notice and reference of dispute to a tribunal was mandatory.7. ..... the first place, in the written statement the appellants have merely stated that they were licence holder and were operating as such in the market ..... court recorded a finding that plaintiff failed to prove sale of any of the items stated in the suit and consequently, he was not entitled to recover amount as alleged. ..... this, defendants have denied the transactions stated by the plaintiff in entirety. ..... besides this, it is stated in the written statement that till 1983 ..... they stated that till 1983 .....

Ajit Shankarrao Ghorpade and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)MhLj578

..... it is incorporated in view of the provisions of sections 11 and 12 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) act 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the said act). ..... no doubt, section 59 of the said act gives power to the state government to exempt the market committees from the certain provisions of the act and therefore the elections were postponed. ..... the said notification provided that since the elections of the zilla parishad samiti and other legal bodies were to take place and therefore in the public interest, the elections of the market committees in the state of maharashtra, except those in respect of which court had given directions to hold elections, shall be postponed fill 31st march, 2007; however after the said period is over, the elections shall be completed by 30th june, 2007. ..... apart from that, we would like to make it clear that the notification dated 13th march, 2007 also does not extend the period of the market committee which has already expired on 26th december, 2006 as stated earlier. ..... 2 in the facts and circumstances stated above and therefore, we find it appropriate to issue any directions to hold an election of the respondent no. 3.8. ..... the state government may by order in official gazette extend from time to time the term of any such committee so however that the period for which the term of office is so extended shall not exceed the period of one year in aggregate.5. .....

Ashok Bhumanna Chepurvar Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

..... it is further stated that all licenses have been granted or renewed by the committee as per section 7 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to 'the act of 1963') read with rule 6 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) rules, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules of 1967'), in favour of the traders covered under category b only after satisfying that they have complied with all the requirements necessary for issuance/renewal of the license, by following due process of law. ..... 1 produced by the petitioner at exhibit a to the petition, which discloses that the license issued to the petitioner was to remain valid till 31st august, 2008 and there is no endorsement of further renewal thereof. ..... this is so because as we have already noticed that the challenge in respect of 113 license holders has been duly enquired by the assistant registrar vide order dated 9th may, 2008, and it is negatived in respect of at least 100 license holders, which order has become final. ..... the term of the market committee expired some time in november, 2006, however, the same was extended up to 30th september, 2008 by the appropriate authority vide order dated 23rd march, 2007, 14th november, 2007 and lastly on 25th may, 2008. .....

Shri Sai Vividh Karyakari Seva Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... ahmednagar under the provisions of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulations) act 1963 (hereinafter referred as the "act of 1963" for the sake of brevity). ..... season or any election programme of the state legislature or the parliament or a local authority, coinciding with the election programme of any market committee or such other special reason, in the opinion of the state government, it is not in the public interest to hold elections to any market committee, the state government may, notwithstanding anything contained in this act or in any rules, or bye-laws made thereunder, or any other law for the time being in force, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, by general or special order, postpone the election of any market committee for a period not ..... consequently, rule 36(2) of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) rules, 1967 required the collector to revise the voters list on or before 28-1-2008. ..... if that be so, anybody admitted to the membership or voters list after 28-1-2008 would not be in a position to vote at the election for managing committee which is to take over on expiry of the term of earlier managing committee which ended on 28-7-2008. ..... 5799 of 2008 decided on 22nd october, 2010 has held as under : it is evident from sub rule (1) of rule 36 that members of the village panchayats within the area of operation of the a.p.m.c. .....

Agriculture Produce Market Committee Vs. Parshuram S/O Gopalji Kore

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... the petitioner placing reliance on rule 100(5) of the maharashtra agriculture produce marketing (development and regulations) rules, 1967 contended in its written statement that the petitioner could not appoint the person for more than six months without the permission of the director of marketing who was vested with the necessary powers under the a.p.m.c. ..... the facts necessary to be cited for adjudication of the above petition are stated thus - the respondent herein came to be appointed on 8/12/1992 on a fixed salary of rs.750/- per month by the petitioner which is an agriculture produce market committee functioning at gondia. ..... in so far as invocation of the said jurisdiction is concerned, in the instant case in the teeth of exhs.13 and 14 the respondent has proved his pre-existing right to the pay scale of a junior clerk and therefore the labour court was right in entertaining the said application filed under section 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act. ..... it appears that though the judgment of the labour court was dated 31/10/2006, the respondent was reinstated by the petitioner only on 24/11/2008 i.e. ..... the said writ petition came to be dismissed by this court by judgment and order dated 6/6/2008. ..... the above writ petition filed under articles 226 and 227 of constitution of india takes exception to the judgment and order dated 15/11/2010 passed by the labour court in reference ida no.14 of 2008. .....

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

..... it has been reiterated that the act 2006, has been patterned on the state agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) act 2003, (for short referred to as the 'model act, 2003), by a committee set up by ministry of agriculture, government of india, the purpose of the legislation being similar to the model act, 1998 with updated provisions for meeting the growing situational demands pertaining to creation, sustenance and administration of agricultural markets in the national perspective. ..... the state has claimed that the act, 2006, had been enacted in alignment with the draft model legislation titled the state agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation act) 2003 (hereafter for short referred to as the 'model act 2003'), codified by a committee set up by the ministry of agriculture, government of india. ..... : (2008)2scc95 , agricultural market committee v. .....

Vilas S/O Rangrao Mahalle and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Thr ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... district deputy registrar, cooperative societies, superseding it under section 45 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) act, 1963, (hereinafter referred to as 1963 act) and appointing an administrator on it. ..... the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation), rules, 1967 framed under this act are hereinafter referred to as 1967 rules. ..... petition filed under article 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, 15 directors of agricultural produce market committee, amravati (respondent no. ..... 2011, copies of both reports were sent to the agricultural produce marketing committee (a.p.m.c. ..... this judgment is being delivered only in the light of arguments advanced on the preliminary contentions about absence of effective previous consultation with state agricultural marketing board ie respondent 10 and correctness of procedure followed by respondent no ..... the residuary clause (ix) therein enables it to do such other things as may be of general interest relating to marketing of agricultural produce ..... to consult state agricultural marketing board i.e ..... of state agricultural marketing board, shri dharmadhikari has also pointed out that said chapter does not enable ..... certain contingencies, section 43 is power with the state government to call for and examine the proceedings of market committee or of the director for the purposes of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any decision or order ..... a period of five years in may 2008. .....

Sunil Rameshchandra Kedia Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Secreta ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR14; 2008(111)BomLR327

..... 3 is the election officer for the said elections which are conducted as per provisions of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development & regulation) act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as apmc act) and maharashtra agricultural produce (agricultural development and regulation) rules, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as apmc rules).2 ..... is to be noted that the decision of disqualification of a member under rule 41(3) is to be taken by director and the decision of director is subject to further appeal before the state government. ..... he further states that there ought to be an order of disqualification against the petitioner by director after following the procedure as prescribed under rule 41(3) of apmc rules and in absence of such order, the petitioner cannot be treated as ..... advocate adbe states that the judgments of this court relied upon by the petitioner are about consideration of all together different provisions and those judgments are not relevant in present ..... this court in its order dated 24th november, 2008, rejected the request of petitioner to include his name in the list of validly nominated candidates which came to be published on 25.11.2008 after observing that if ultimately the petitioner succeeds, his name can be directed to be added and he can be permitted to contest the election. ..... he relies upon the provisions of rule 32(5)(a) to point out the procedure and states that if the disqualification is held to be automatic, said provision is rendered nugatory .....