Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: fundamental error Page 1 of about 809 results (0.01 seconds)Constitution of India Part 3
Title: Fundamental Rights
State: Central
Year: 1950
.....the enforcement of section 3 of the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, article 22 shall stand amended as directed in section 3 of that Act. For the text of section 3 of that Act, Article 23 to 24 - Right against Exploitation Article 23 - Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour (1) Traffic in human beings and beggar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. (2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purpose, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them. Article 24 - Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc. No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment. Article 25 to 28 - Right to Freedom of Religion Article 25 - Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionConstitution of India Part 4A
Title: Fundamental Duties
State: Central
Year: 1950
1[PART IVA FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES ________________________ 1. Inserted By the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, section 11 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 215
Title: Effect of Errors
State: Central
Year: 1973
.....he became possessed thereof that such coin was counterfeit," the word " fraudulently" being omitted in the charge. Unless it appears that A was in fact misled by this omission, the error shall not be regarded as material. (b) A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the charge, or is set out incorrectly. A defends himself, calls witnesses and gives his own account of the transaction. The Court may infer from this that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating is not material. (c) A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the-charge. There were many transactions between A and B, and A had no means of knowing to which of them the charge referred, and offered no defence. The Court may infer from such facts that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating was, in the case, a material error. (d) A is charged with the murder of Khoda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the dale of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. A was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 465
Title: Finding or Sentence when Reversible by Reason of Error, Omission or Irregularity
State: Central
Year: 1973
(1) Subject to the provisions hereinbefore contained, on finding sentence or order passed by a Court of competent jurisdiction shall be reversed or altered by a Court of appeal, confirmation or revision on account of any error, omission or irregularity in the complaint, summons, warrant, proclamation, order, judgment or other proceedings before or during trial or in any inquiry or other proceedings under this Code, or any error, or irregularity in any sanction for the prosecution unless in the opinion of that Court, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby. (2) In determining whether any error, omission or irregularity in any proceeding under this Code, or any error, or irregularity in any sanction for the prosecution has occasioned a failure of justice, the Court shall have regard to the fact whether the objection could and should have been raised at an earlier stage in the proceedings.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionPatents Act, 1970 (39 of 1970) Section 78
Title: Power of Controller to Correct Clerical Errors, Etc.
State: Central
Year: 1970
.....59 as regards amendment of applications for patents or complete specifications1[or other documents related thereto] and subject to the provisions of section 44, the Controller may, in accordance with the provisions of this section, correct any clerical error in any patent or in any specification or other document filed in pursuance of such application or in any application for a patent or any clerical error in any matter which is entered in the register. (2) A correction may be made in pursuance of this section either upon a request in writing made by any person interested and accompanied by the prescribed fee, or without such a request. (3) Where the Controller proposes to make any such correction as aforesaid otherwise than in pursuance of a request made under this section, he shall give notice of the proposal to the patentee or the applicant for the patent, as the case may be, and to any other person who appears to him to be concerned, and shall give them an opportunity to be heard before making the correction. (4) Where a request is made under this section for the correction of any error in a patent or application for a patent or any document filed in pursuance of such.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionForeign Marriage Act, 1969 Section 26
Title: Correction of Errors
State: Central
Year: 1969
(1) Any Marriage Officer who discovers any error in the form or substance of any entry in the Marriage Certificate Book may, within one month next after the discovery of such error, in the presence of the persons, married or, in case of their death or absence, in the presence of two other witnesses, correct the error by entry in the margin without any alteration of the original entry and add thereto the date of such correction. (2) Every correction made under this section shall be attested by the witnesses in whose presence it was made.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionChristian Marriage Act1872 Section 78
Title: Corrections of Errors
State: Central
Year: 1872
Every person charged with the duty of registering any marriage, who discovers any error in the form or substance of any such entry, may within one month next after the discovery of such error, in the presence of the persons married, or, in case of their death or absence, in the presence of no other credible witnesses, correct the error by entry in the margin, without any alteration of the original entry, and shall sign the marginal entry, and add thereto the date of such correction, and such person shall make the like marginal entry in the certificate thereof. And every entry made under this section shall be attested by the witnesses in whose presence it was made. And, in case such certificate has been already sent to the {Subs.by Act 6 of 1886, section.30(b), for " Secretary to the L.G.".} [Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages], such person shall make and send in like manner a separate certificate of the original erroneous entry, and of the marginal correction therein made.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionSpecial Marriage Act, 1954 Section 49
Title: Correction of Errors
State: Central
Year: 1954
(1) Any Marriage Officer who discovers any error in the form or substance of any entry in the Marriage Certificate Book may, within one month next after the discovery of such error, in the presence of the persons married or, in case of their death or absence, in the presence of two other credible witnesses, correct the error by entry in the margin without any alteration of the original entry and shall sign the marginal entry and add thereto the date of such correction and the Marriage Officer shall make the like marginal entry in the certificate thereof. (2) Every correction made under this section shall be attested by the witnesses in whose presence it was made. (3) Where a copy of any entry has already been sent under section 48 to the Registrar-General or other authority the Marriage Officer shall make and send in like manner a separate certificate of the original erroneous entry and of the marginal corrections therein made.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionKarnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Section 59
Title: Orders Not Reversible by Reason of Error or Irregularity Not Occasioning Failure of Justice
State: Karnataka
Year: 1964
No order passed by a Revenue Officer shall be reversed or altered in appeal or revision on account of an error, omission, or irregularity in the summons, notice, proclamation, warrant or order or any other proceedings under this Act, unless such error, omission or irregularity has, in fact, occasioned a failure of justice.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consilidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Section 32
Title: Power to Vary Scheme on Ground of Error, Irregularity, Informality
State: Central
Year: 1947
.....thereby communicate in writing any objection to such variation to the 3 [SettlementCommissioner]. (3)After receiving the objections under sub-section (2) the 1 [SettlementCommissioner] may, after making such enquiry as 4 [he may] think fit,5 [* * *] make the variation with or without modification or may notmake any variation. 6 [(3A) If the scheme is variedunder sub-section (3), a notification stating that the scheme has been variedshall be published in the Official Gazette and the scheme so varied shall bepublished in the prescribed manner in the village or villages concerned.] (4)From the date of the notification 7 [stating that the scheme has beenvaried] the variation shall take effect as if it were incorporated in thescheme. _____________________________ 1.These words were substituted forthe words "State Government" by Mah. 19 of 1966, s. 14(a) and(c)(i) 2.These brackets, words, figuresand letter were inserted by Bom. 33 of 1956, s. 6(1). 3.These words were substituted forthe words "State Government through the Settlement Commissioner" byMah. 19 of 1966 s. 14(b). 4.These words were substituted forthe words "it may" Mah. 19 of 1966 s. 14(b), s. 14(c)(ii). .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>