Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: fraud in the executionSign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialBombay Execution of Decrees (Temporary Postponement) Act, 1959, (Maharashtra) Preamble
Title: the Bombay Execution of Decrees (Temporary Postponement) Act, 1959
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1959
.....III relates to the areas in which the State Government has merely ordered suspension or remission of land revenue. In both cases, however, under Sections 1(3) and (4) of the Act, it is the State Government which has to specify the date by notification in the Official Gazette from which Part II or III, as the case may be, shall come into force in any area and to specify the date by like notification from which the relevant Part shall cease to be in force in that area. So far, these powers of the State Government were delegated to the Commissioners under Section 3(4) of the Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957. But to save correspondence between the Commissioner and the Collectors and consequent delay and as the work relating to suspension or remission of the land revenue is being done by the Collectors, the Divisional Commissioners, in their Conference held in November, 1975, have recommended that these powers may be delegated to the Collectors directly. The Act implements this recommendation, by suitably amending Sections 1(3) and (4) of the Execution of Decrees (Temporary Postponement) Act, 1959.- vide Statement of Objects and Reasons-Maharashtra XII of 1979. .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionUnion Territories (Separation of Judicial and Executive Functions) Act, 1969 Preamble 1
Title: Union Territories (Separation of Judicial and Executive Functions) Act, 1969
State: Central
Year: 1969
THE UNION TERRITORIES (SEPARATION OF JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS) ACT, 1969 [Act, No. 19 of 1969] [31st May, 1969] PREAMBLE An Act to provide for the separation of judicial and executive functions in Union Territories. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twentieth Year of the Republic of India as follows :
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionUnion Territories (Separation of Judicial and Executive Functions) Act, 1969 Section 5
Title: Functions Exercisable by Judicial and Executive Magistrates
State: Central
Year: 1969
Where under any law the functions exercisable by a Magistrate relate to matters which involve the application or sifting of evidence or the formulation of any decision which exposes any person to any punishment, or penalty, or detention in custody pending investigation, inquiry or trial or would have the effect of sending him for trial before any Court, such functions shall, subject to the provisions of this Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, as amended by this Act, be exercisable by a Judicial Magistrate and where such functions relate to matters which are administrative or executive in nature, such as the grant of a licence, the suspension or cancellation of a licence, sanctioning a prosecution, or withdrawing from a prosecution, they shall, subject as aforesaid, be exercisable by an Executive Magistrate.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionUnion Territories (Separation of Judicial and Executive Functions) Act, 1969 Complete Act
Title: Union Territories (Separation of Judicial and Executive Functions) Act, 1969
State: Central
Year: 1969
Preamble1 - UNION TERRITORIES (SEPARATION OF JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS) ACT, 1969 Section1 - Short title, extent and commencement Section2 - Definition Section3 - Amendments to Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 Section4 - Amendments not to render invalid notifications, etc. before commencement of Act Section5 - Functions exercisable by judicial and executive Magistrates Section6 - Repeal of laws in transferred areas in Himachal Pradesh Section7 - Saving Section8 - Power to remove difficulties Section9 - Power of Legislative Assembly of Union territory to amend this Act Schedule1 - SCHEDULE
List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Execution of Decrees (Temporary Postponement) Act, 1959, (Maharashtra) Part II
Title: Stay of Execution of Decrees and Postpone?ment of Institution of Suits in Certain Cases Under Scarcity or Famine
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1959
Part II STAY OF EXECUTION OF DECREES AND POSTPONE MENT OF INSTITUTION OF SUITS IN CERTAIN CASES UNDER SCARCITY OR FAMINE
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionBombay Execution of Decrees (Temporary Postponement) Act, 1959, (Maharashtra) Part III
Title: Stay of Execution of Decrees and Postpone?ment of Institution of Suits in Certain Cases Not Falling Under Part Ii
State: Maharashtra
Year: 1959
Part III STAY OF EXECUTION OF DECREES AND POSTPONE MENT OF INSTITUTION OF SUITS IN CERTAIN CASES NOT FALLING UNDER PART II
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionLimitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Section 17
Title: Effect of Fraud or Mistake
State: Central
Year: 1963
.....the plaintiff or the applicant first had the means of producing the concealed document or compelling its production: Provided that nothing in this section shall enable any suit to be instituted or application to be made to recover or enforce any charge against, or set aside any transaction affecting, any property which-- (i) in the case of fraud, has been purchased for valuable consideration by a person who was not a party to the fraud and did not at the time of the purchase know, or have reason to believe, that any fraud had been committed, or (ii) in the case of mistake, has been purchased for valuable consideration subsequently to the transaction in which the mistake was made, by a person who did not know, or have reason to believe, that the mistake had been made, or (iii) in the case of a concealed document, has been purchased for valuable consideration by a person who was not a party to the concealment and, did not at the time of purchase know, or have reason to believe, that the document had been concealed. (2) Where a judgment-debtor has, by fraud or force, prevented the execution of a decree or order within the period of limitation, the court may, on the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Succession Act, 1925 Section 61
Title: Will Obtained by Fraud, Coercion or Importunity
State: Central
Year: 1925
.....imprisonment. (iv) A threatens to shoot B, or to burn his house or to cause him to be arrested on a criminal charge, unless he makes a bequest in favour of C. B, in consequence, makes a bequest in favour of C. The bequest is void, the making of it having been caused by coercion. (v) A, being of sufficient intellect, if undisturbed by the influence of others, to make a will yet being so much under the control of B that he is not a free agent, makes a Will dictated by B. It appears that he would not have executed the will but for fear of B. The Will is invalid. (vi) A, being in so feeble a state of health as to be unable to resist importunity, is pressed by B to make a Will of a certain purport and does so merely to purchase peace and in submission to B. The Will is invalid. (vii) A being in such a state of health as to be capable of exercising his own judgment and volition, B uses urgent intercession and persuasion with him to induce him to make a Will of a certain purport. A, in consequence of the intercession and persuasion, but in the free exercise of his judgment and volition makes his Will in the manner recommended by B. The Will is not rendered invalid by the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCompanies Act, 2013, Section 212
Title: Investigation into Affairs of Company by Serious Fraud Investigation Office
State: Central
Year: 2013
..... (6) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the offences covered under sub-sections (5) and (6) of section 7, section 34, section 36, subsection (1) of section 38, sub-section (5) of section 46, sub-section (7) of section 56, subsection (10) of section 66, sub-section (5) of section 140, sub-section (4) of section 206, section 213, section 229, sub-section (1) of section 251, sub-section (3) of section 339 and section 448 which attract the punishment for fraud provided in section 447 of this Act shall be cognizable and no person accused of any offence under those sections shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless-- (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release; and (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail: Provided that a person, who, is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or infirm, may be released on bail, if the Special Court so directs: Provided further.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 Appendix E
Title: Execution
State: Central
Year: 1908
.....order be sent to ..... with a copy of the decree and of any order which may have been made for execution of the same and a certificate of non-satisfaction. Dated the .................. day of ................... 19......../20.... . Judge No. 4 certificate of non-satisfaction of decree (Title) Certified that no* satisfaction of the decree of this Court in suit No. ..... of 19..../20...., a copy which is hereunto attached, has been obtained by execution within the jurisdiction of this Court. Dated the ................. day of ..................... 19........./20.... . Judge No. 5 certificate of the execution of decree transferred to another court (0.21.1.6.) (Title) No. of Suit and the Court by which the decree was passed Names if parties Date of application for excution Number of the execution case Process issued and dates of service thereof Costs of execution Amount realized How the case disposed of Remarks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial