Bare Act Search Results

Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Complete Act

Title: the Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1957

Preamble - THE ACT FOR AVOIDING WAGERS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1865 Section 1 - Contracts declared null and void. No suit allowed on such contracts Section 2 - Nor for commission or brokerage, etc., in respect of agreements by way of gaming or wagering Section 3 - Payments for which guardian and personal representative not to be allowed credit Section 4 - Repeal and savings Section 5 - Number and gender

Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Preamble

Title: the Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1957

THE BOMBAY COMMISSIONERS OF DIVISIONS ACT, 1957 [Act No. 8 of 19581] [10th January, 1958] PREAMBLE An Act to provide for the offices of Commissioners of divisions in the State of Bombay, for prescribing their powers and duties and to make provisions consequent on the provisions for such offices and for certain other matters WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the offices of Commissioners of divisions in the State of Bombay, for prescribing their powers and duties and to make provisions for matters consequent on the provision for such offices and for certain other matters; It is hereby enacted in the Eighth Year of the Republic of India as follows :- ___________________ 1. For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Bombay Government Gazette, 1957. Part V. p. 281.

Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Schedule

Title: Schedule

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1957

.....word "Commissioner" the word "Collector" shall be substituted. 6. In section 203, sub-section (2) shall be deleted. The Hyderabad Land Revenue Act (Hyd. Act VIII of 1317 F.). 1. Throughout the Act, for the words "Divisional Officer" and "Divisional Officers" the words "Commissioner" and "Commissioners" shall, respec­tively, be substituted. 2. For sections 3 and 4, the following shall be substituted, namely :- "3. Chief controlling authority in revenue matters.- The chief controlling authority in all matters connected with the land revenue shall vest in the Commissioner, subject to the State Govern­ment. 4. Formation of divisions.- The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute the whole of the Hyderabad area of the State of Bombay or any part thereof into a division and may by a like notification alter the limits of the division so constituted. 4A. Commissioner for each division.- On the commencement of the Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, there shall be a Commissioner for each division : Provided that nothing in this section shall pre­clude the appointment of the same officer as Com­missioner for.....

The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division &Amp; Commercial Appellate Division Of High Courts Act, 2015 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2015

.....APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS ACT, 2015 THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION & COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS ACT, 2015 NO. 4 OF 2016 An Act to provide for the constitution of Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division in the High Courts for adjudicating commercial disputes of specified value and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Be it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows: CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title, extent and commencement. 1. (1) This Act may be called the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015. (2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. (3) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the 23rd day of October, 2015. Definitions. 2. (1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, (a) Commercial Appellate Division means the Commercial Appellate Division in a High Court constituted under sub-section (1) of section 5; (b) Commercial Court means the Commercial Court constituted under sub-section (1) of section 3; (c) commercial dispute .....

Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Amalgamanation of Bombay and Kokan Division) Act, 1983 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1983

.....of this Act. notwithstanding anything contained in the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code 1966 (Mah. XLI of 1966), and the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1981 (Mah. XLVII of 1981) in order to amalgamate the Bombay Division and the Konkan Division into a single Division, the existing Bombay Division consisting of the two Districts of the City of Bombay and the Bombay Suburban District shall cease to be a separate Division, the areas of the said two Districts shall be deemed to be included in the areas of the existing Konkan Division, and the Konkan Division shall from the said date for the purposes of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, consist of the six Districts of City of Bombay, Bombay Suburban District, Thane, Raigad, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg. SECTION 03: SAVING Any appeals or other proceedings, pertaining to the City of Bombay or the Bombay Suburban District, filed and pending before the Commissioner for the Bombay Division, on the date of commencement of this Act, shall be continued and disposed of by the Commissioner for the Konkan Division or by any officer authorised by him in this behalf, as the case may be. Maharashtra State Acts

Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Section 2

Title: Definitions

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1957

.....as such, immediately before the commencement of this Act. under the provisions of - (i) section 5 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879, or that section of the Code in its applica tion to the Kutch area of the State of Bombay; (ii) section 5 of the said Code in its application to the Saurashtra area of the State of Bombay arid read with the Government Notification in the Legal Department No. 25398/B, dated 1st November, 1956 issued under section 122 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956; (iii) section 9-A of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1954, read with Government Notification in the Revenue Department No. RVA. 1556-R, dated 1st November, 1956; or (iv) section 4 of the Hyderabad Land Revenue Act; (e) "existing law" means any enactment of a Legislature or other competent authority in relation to matters specified in lists II and III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution in force in any part of the State immediately before the commencement of this Act and includes any rule, by-law, regulation, order, notification, scheme, form or other instrument having the force of law made, prescribed or issued under any such commencement; (f) "Schedule" means the.....

Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1957

.....as such, immediately before the commencement of this Act, under the provisions of- (i) section 5 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879, or that section of the Code in its application to the Kutch area of the State of Bombay, (ii) section 5 of the said Code in its application to the Saurashtra area of the State of Bombay and read with the Government Notification in the Legal Department No. 25398/B dated 1st November 1956 issued under section 122 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, (iii) section 9-A of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1954, read with Government Notification in the Revenue Department No.RVA 1556-R, dated 1st November 1956; or (iv) section 4 of the Hyderabad Land Revenue Act; (e) "existing law" means any enactment of a Legislature or other competent authority in relation to matters specified in Lists II and III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution in force in any part of the State immediately before the commencement of this Act and includes any rule, bye-law, regulation, order, notification, scheme, form or other instrument having the force of law made, prescribed or issued under any such enactment ; (f) "Schedule" means the Schedule appended to.....

Maharashtra High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench & Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1986 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1986

.....any direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and every application invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 or Article 228 of the Constitution of India, pending before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, on the date of commencement of this Act, or filed on or after the said date, whether the matter in dispute is or has arisen in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court. Provided that, the High Court may, by rules made after previous publication [deleted by Mah. Act No. 27 of 2008, and with the previous......State Government. w.e.f. 1.7.1987] [* * *] prescribed that such of that application referred to above, arising in Greater Bombay or outside Greater Bombay, as may be specified in the rules, may be heard and disposed of by a single Judge appointed by the Chief Justice. 3. Abolition of appeal from judgment or order of single Judge of High Court made in exercise of original or appellate jurisdiction.:- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Letters Patent for the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, dated the.....

Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957, (Maharashtra) Section 3

Title: Amendments to Enactment; Power of State Government to Confer Powers and Impose Duties on Commission???ers Under Any Law

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1957

.....determination. The delegation was. therefore, proper. Sadruddin v. J. H. Patwardhan, 1965 Mah. L. J, 290. The Legislature has not, in enacting sub-section (H) of section 3. parted with its essential legislative function. The Legislature has clearly laid down its policy and has left it only to the State Government. Subsidiary or ancilliary matters to implement the policy of the State Legislature. Therefore, provisions of the Act are not ultra vires of State Legislature and there is no excessive delegation of legislative power. Ganesh v. Commissioner, Nagpur Division. 1965 Mah. L. J. 577. Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954, Section 2A(2) - Notifications under the provisions of another Statute : Notifications under the provisions of another Statue.- In the case of Sombharti Guru Damu Bharti v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.. 2000 (3) All M. R. 453 : 2000 AIR 352 (Bom.) : 2001 (1) Mh. L. J. 914 : 2000 (Sup.) Bom. C. R. 371. Full Bench of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) held that notifications issued under the Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957 relation to section 2-A regarding to the appeal being heard by the Commissioner.....

The Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 Complete Act

State: Chattisgarh

Year: 2006

.....if the petitioner satisfies the Division Bench that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within such period. Explanation.--The fact that the petitioner was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may by sufficient cause within the meaning of this sub-section. (3) An appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed, heard and decided in accordance with the procedure as may be prescribed by the High Court. Section 3 - Power to make rules (1) The High Court may, from time to time, make rules for carrying out all or any of the purpose of the Act. (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for the procedure of filing, hearing and disposal of appeal under sub-section (3) of section 2. Section 4 - Repeal and Saving (1) The Chhattisgarh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Letter Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981 (No. 29 of 1981) is hereby repealed. (2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under or in pursuance of the said Act and which has attained finality shall not be reopened in any court of law. .....