Bare Act Search Results

Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959, (Maharashtra) Section 6

Title: Computation of Fees Payable in Certain Suits for Money

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1959

.....period of the charge is less than one year; 7 (ha) for avoidance of sales contract for sale etc. --In suits for declaration that any sale, or contract for sale or termination of contract for sale, of any movable or immovable property is void--one-half of ad valorem fee leviable on the value of the property; 7 (hb) for avoidance of an acquisition proceeding --In suits for declaration that any proceedings for compulsory acquisition of any movable or immovable property are void--one-half of ad valorem fee leviable on the value of the property. (i) for accounts.--In suits for accounts-according to the amount at which the relief sought is valued in the plaint or memorandum of appeal, subject to the provisions of section 8 and subject to a minimum fee of 8 [one hundred rupees]. (j) for other declarations.--In suits where declaration is sought, with or without injunction or other consequential relief and the subject-matter in dispute is not susceptible of monetary evaluation and which are not otherwise provided for by this Act 9 [--ad valorem fee payable, as if the amount or value of the subject-matter was 10 [one thousand rupees]. In all suits under clauses (a)to (i) the.....

Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1959

.....would have occasioned a less court-fee to be paid on the probate or letters of administration granted in respect of such estate than has been actually paid thereon under this Act, such Authority may return the difference, provided the same be claimed within three years after the date of such probate or letters. But when, by reason of any legal proceeding, the debts due from the deceased have not been ascertained and paid, or his effects have not been recovered and made available, and in consequence thereof the executor or administrator is prevented from claiming the return of such difference within the said term of three years, the said Authority may allow such further time for making the claim as may appear to be reasonable under the circumstances. SECTION 23: RELIEF IN CASE OF SEVERAL GRANTS Whenever a grant of probate or letters of administration has been or is made in respect of the whole of the property belonging to an estate, and the full fee chargeable under this Act has been or is paid thereon, no fee shall be chargeable under the same Act when a like grant is made in respect of the whole or any part of the same property belonging to the same estate. Whenever.....

Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Section 34B

Title: Resumption of the Possession of Premises Including the Residential Tenements on Breach of Terms and Conditions of Lease or Holding Without Authority

State: Karnataka

Year: 1966

.....or part thereof or residential tenement should not be resumed. (3) After considering the cause, if any, shown by the allottee and after giving him an opportunity of being heard, the Board may pass such orders, as it deems fit. (4) Where the Board passes an order under sub-section (3), for resuming possession of the premises or part thereof or residential tenement in the industrial area it may, by notice in writing, order any allottee to surrender and deliver possession thereof to the Board or any person duly authorised in this behalf within the date specified in the notice. (5) If any allottee refuses to surrender or deliver the possession of the premises or part thereof or residential tenement within the time specified in the notice, the Board or any officer authorised by it in this behalf may resume the possession of the premises or part thereof or residential tenement free from all encumbrances and for that purpose may use force as may be necessary".] _________________________ 1. Section 34B inserted by Act 19 of 2000 w.e.f. 25.5.2000.

Competition Act, 2002 Chapter 2

Title: Prohibition of Certain Agreements, Abuse of Dominant Position and Regulation of Combinations

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....of the Explanation to section 5.]] ___________________________________________ 1. Substituted for the following by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. "(1) No enterprise shall abuse its dominant position." 2. Substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007] for the words, brackets and figure "under sub-section (1), if an enterprise". 3. Inserted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. 4. Effective date :20th May 2009- notified vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification No S.O.1241(E) dated 15.05.2009. Section 5 - Combination Regulation of combinations 5. Combination.-- The acquisition of one or more enterprises by one or more persons or merger or amalgamation of enterprises shall be a combination of such enterprises and persons or enterprises, if-- (a) any acquisition where-- (i) the parties to the acquisition, being the acquirer and the enterprise, whose control shares, voting rights or assets have been acquired or are being acquired jointly have,-- (A) either, in India, the assets of the value of more than rupees one thousand crores or turnover more than.....

Competition Act, 2002 Section 4

Title: Prohibition of Abuse of Dominant Position: Abuse of Dominant Position

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....provision of services, at a price which is below the cost, as may be determined by regulations, of production of the goods or provision of services, with a view to reduce competition or eliminate the competitors. 3[(c) "group" shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (b) of the Explanation to section 5.]] ___________________________________________ 1. Substituted for the following by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. "(1) No enterprise shall abuse its dominant position." 2. Substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007] for the words, brackets and figure "under sub-section (1), if an enterprise". 3. Inserted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. 4. Effective date :20th May 2009- notified vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification No S.O.1241(E) dated 15.05.2009.

Indian Easements Act, 1882 Section 43

Title: Extinction by Permanent Change in Dominant Heritage

State: Central

Year: 1882

Where, by, any permanent change in the dominant heritage, the burden on the servient heritage is materially increased and cannot be reduced by the servient owner without interfering with the lawful enjoyment Of the easement, the easement is extinguished unless-- (a) it was intended for the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant heritage, to whatever extent the easement should be used; or (b) the injury caused to the servient owner by the change is so slight that no reasonable person would complain of it; or (c) the easement is an easement of necessity. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to an easement entitling the dominant owner to support of the dominant heritage.

Competition Act, 2002 Section 27

Title: Orders by Commission After Inquiry into Agreements or Abuse of Dominant Position

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....section, against such members of the group.]] __________________________________________ 1. Proviso substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to substitution it read as: "Provided that in case any agreement referred to in section 3has been entered into by any cartel, the Commission shall impose upon each producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider included in that cartel, a penalty equivalent to three times of the amount of profits made out of such agreement by the cartel or ten per cent, of the average of the turnover of the cartel for the last preceding three financial years, whichever is higher;" 2. Clause (c) omitted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to omission it read as: "(c) award compensation to parties in accordance with the provisions contained in section 34;" 3. Clause (f) omitted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to omission it read as: "(f) recommend to the Central Government for the division of an enterprise enjoying dominant position;" 4. Substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007] for the word.....

Competition Act, 2002 Section 19

Title: Inquiry into Certain Agreements and Dominant Position of Enterprise

State: Central

Year: 2002

.....determining whether an agreement has an appreciable adverse effect on competition under section 3, have due regard to all or any of the following factors, namely:-- (a) creation of barriers to new entrants in the market; (b) driving existing competitors out of the market; (c) foreclosure of competition by hindering entry into the market; (d) accrual of benefits to consumers; (e) improvements in production or distribution of goods or provision of services; (f) promotion of technical, scientific and economic development by means of production or distribution of goods or provision of services. (4) The Commission shall, while inquiring whether an enterprise enjoys a dominant position or not under section4, have due regard to all or any of the following factors, namely:-- (a) market share of the enterprise; (b) size and resources of the enterprise; (c) size and importance of the competitors; (d) economic power of the enterprise including commercial advantages over competitors; (e) vertical integration of the enterprises or sale or service network of such enterprises; (f) dependence of consumers on the enterprise; (g) monopoly or dominant position whether.....

Competition Act, 2002 Section 28

Title: Division of Enterprise Enjoying Dominant Position

State: Central

Year: 2002

..... (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any contract or in any memorandum or articles of association, an officer of a company who ceases to hold office as such in consequence of the division of an enterprise shall not be entitled to claim any compensation for such cesser.] ___________________________________ 1. Substituted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007] for the words, brackets, letter and figures "Central Government, on recommendation under clause (f) of section 27" 2. Omitted by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 [Act No. 39 of 2007]. Prior to omission it read as: "(d) the payment of compensation to any person who suffered any loss due to dominant position of such enterprise;" 3. Effective date :20th May 2009- notified vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification No S.O.1241(E) dated 15.05.2009.

Indian Easements Act, 1882 Section 19

Title: Transfer of Dominant Heritage Passes Easement

State: Central

Year: 1882

Where the dominant heritage is transferred or devolves, by act of parties or by operation of law, the transfer or devolution shall, unless a contrary intention appears, be deemed to pass the easement to the person in whose favour the transfer or devolution takes place. Illustration A has certain land to which a right of way is annexed. A lets the land to B for twenty years. The right of way vests in B and his legal representatives so long as the lease continues.