Bare Act Search Results

The Sikkim Stra Dogs & Rabnies Control Act, 2000 Complete Act

State: Sikkim

Year: 2000

.....collection and safe disposal of the carecasses of any dog destroyed under this Act. Offences. 9. Any person who contravences any provisions of this Act, rules, notification or directions issued thereunder, shall be punishable with a fine of Rs. 500/- (Rupees five hundred or an imprisonment for a period of one month or with both. Power to make rules. 10. (1) The State Government maybe , by notification, make rules to carry out all or any of the purposes of this Act. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of he foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:- (a) Charges to be levied for registration and vaccination. (b) Manner of disposal of carecass and charge of its disposal. (c) Cost of destruction of stray animals affected with rabies. Power to remove difficulties. 11. If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provision of this Act, the State Government may, by general of special order published in the Official Gazette , make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as may appear to be necessary or expedient for the removal of the difficulty. Provided that no such order shall be made.....

The Maharashtra Dog Race Course Licensing Act, 1976 Complete Act

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1976

.....is pursued by dogs; (b) "race-course" means any ground on which a dog-race can be held ; (c) "Schedule" means the Schedule appended to this Act. SECTION 03: PROHIBITION AGAINST DOG-RACING ON UNLICENSED DOG RACE-COURSES (1) No dog-race shall be held save on a race courses for which a licence for dog-racing granted in accordance with the provisions of this Act, is in force. (2) The terms of such licence shall be published in the Official Gazette. SECTION 04: LICENCE FOR DOG-RACING (l) The owner, lessee or occupier of any race-course may apply to the State Government for a licence for dog-racing on such race-course. (2) The State Government may withhold such licence or grant it subject to such conditions and for such period as it may think fit. Such conditions may provide for" (a) the payment of a licence fee ; (b) the amount of stakes which may be allotted for different kinds of dogs ; (c) such other matters, whether directly or indirectly connected with dog-racing, for which, in the opinion of the State Government, it is necessary or expedient to make provision in the licence. (3) The State Government may by such licence authorize the.....

Cantonments Act, 1924 Section 119

Title: Registration and Control of Dogs

State: Central

Year: 1924

.....any ferocious dog which belongs to him or is in his charge to be at large without being muzzled, or (b) sets on or urges any dog or other animal to attack, worry or intimidate any person, or (c) knowing or having reason to believe that any dog or animal belonging to him or in his charge has been bitten by an animal suffering or reasonably suspected to be suffering from rabies, neglects to give immediate information of the fact to the Executive Officer or gives information which is false, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees. ________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 24 of 1936, section 69, for "Cantonment Authority". 2. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 77, for "unit" w.e.f. 1-10-1983. 3. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 77, for "A Board" w.e.f. 1-10-1983. 4. Substituted by Act 15 of 1983, section 77, for "it" w.e.f. 1-10-1983.

Cantonments Act, 2006 Section 290

Title: Registration and Control of Dogs

State: Central

Year: 2006

.....not be at large without muzzles and chain leads, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees. (6) Whoever in a cantonment-- (a) allows any ferocious dog which belongs to him or is in his charge to be at large without being muzzled; or (b) sets on or urges any dog or other animal to attack, worry or intimidate any person, or (c) knowing or having reason to believe that any dog or animal belonging to him or in his charge has been bitten by an animal suffering or reasonably suspected to be suffering from rabies, neglects to give immediate information of the fact to the Chief Executive Officer or gives information which is false, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees.

New Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 Section 310

Title: Registration and Control of Dogs

State: Central

Year: 1994

.....any person, or (b) the Chairperson has, by public notice during the prevalence of rabies, directed that dogs shall not be at large without muzzles and chain leads. (5) No one shall-- (a) allow any ferocious dog which belongs to him or is in his charge to be at large without being muzzled; or (b) set on or urge any dog or other animal to attack, worry or intimidate any person; or (c) knowing or having reason to believe that any dog or animal belonging to him or in his charge has been bitten by an animal suffering or reasonably suspected to be suffering from rabies, fail or neglect to give immediate information of the fact to the Chairperson or give information which is false.

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 222

Title: Provision as to Dogs

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

.....owner has claimed it, has provided a proper muzzle for it and has paid all the expenses of its detention, or cause it to be destroyed. (3) When a dog which has been detained under the sub-section (2) iswearing a collar with the owner's name and address thereon, such dog shall not be destroyed until a letter stating the fact that it has been so detained has been sent to the said address, and the dog has remained unclaimed for three clear days: Provided that any dog which is found to be rabid may be destroyed at any time. (4) Any unclaimed dog and any dog, the owner of which refuses to payall the expenses of its detention, may be sold or destroyed, after having been detained for the said period of three clear days. (5) All expenses incurred by the municipal council under this section maybe recovered from the owner of any dog which has been taken possession of or detained in the manner provided by Chapter VII. (6) No damage shall be payable in respect of any dog destroyed under this section.

Karnataka Police Act, 1963 Section 43

Title: Destruction of Stray Dogs

State: Karnataka

Year: 1963

.....such detention, may be destroyed or sold with the sanction and under the orders of the competent authority. (4) The proceeds of the sale of any dog under sub-section (3) shall be applied, as far as may be, in discharge of the expenses incurred in connection with its detention, and the balance, if any, shall form part of the Consolidated Fund of the State. (5) Any expenses incurred in connection with the destruction or detention of any dog under this section shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), be recoverable from the owner thereof upon a warrant issued by the competent authority as if it were a warrant issued under section 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.

Bombay Police Act, 1951, (Maharashtra) Section 44

Title: Destruction of Stray Dogs

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1951

.....sanction and under the orders of the competent authority. (4) The proceeds of the sale of any dog under sub-section (3) shall be applied, as far as may be, in discharge of the expenses incurred in connection with its detention, and the balance, if any, shall form part of the consolidated fund of the State. (5) Any expenses incurred in connection with the destruction or detention of any dog under this section shall, subject to the provisons of sub-section (4), be recoverable from the owner thereof upon a warrant issued by the competent authority as if it were a warrant under section 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. ___________________ 1. This word was substituted for words "District Superintendent" by Mah. 46 of 1962, s. 3, Sch.

Bombay Police Act, 1951, (Maharashtra) Section 106

Title: Letting Loose Horse, Etc. and Suffering Ferocious Dogs to Be at Large

State: Maharashtra

Year: 1951

No person shall in any street or public place (A) negligently let loose any horse or other animal, so as to cause danger, injury, alarm or annoyance, or suffer a ferocious dog to be at large without a muzzle or (B) set on or urge a dog or other animal to attack, worry or put in fear any person or horse or other animal.

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 251

Title: Duties of Municipal Council in Respect of Disease Among Horses, Dogs, Cattle, Sheep or Goats

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

If in any 1 [municipal area] any infectious disease amongst horses, dogs, cattle, sheep or goats breaks out, or if the introduction of any such disease appears to be likely, the municipal council shall take all such measures as it deems necessary for the purpose of preventing, meeting, mitigating or suppressing the disease or the outbreak or introduction thereof. _______________________________ 1. Substituted by Act 36 of 1994 w.e.f. 1.6.1994.