Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: do ut des State: central Page 1 of about 5,073 results (0.008 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialGOA, DAMAN AND DIU JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER'S COURT (DECLARATION AS HIGH COURT) ACT, 1964[REPEALED] Section 7
Title: Appeals to lie to the Supreme Court from judgment, decree, etc., passed or made by Tribunal de Relacao
State: Central
Year: 1964
Any person aggrieved- (a) By any judgment, decree, order or sentence of the Tribunal de Relacao passed or made before the 20th December, 1961, against which an appeal would lie to a superior Court in Portugal in accordance with law but could not be preferred by reason of Goa, Daman and Diu becoming part of the territory of India, or against which an appeal having been preferred to a superior Court in Portugal in accordance with law had not been disposed of before the said date; or (b) By any judgment, decree, order or sentence of the Tribunal de Relacao passed or made on or after the 20th December, 1961, may, within ninety days from the date of passing of this Act, prefer an appeal from such judgment, decree, order or sentence to the Supreme Court as if such judgment, decree, order or sentence had been passed or made by the Judicial Commissioner's Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionWild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Section 38W
Title: Alteration and De-notification of Tiger Reserves
State: Central
Year: 1972
1 [Section 38W - Alteration and de-notification of tiger reserves (1) No alteration in the boundaries of a tiger reserve shall be made except on a recommendation of the Tiger Conservation Authority and the approval of the National Board for Wild Life. (2) No State Government shall de-notify a tiger reserve, except in public interest with the approval of the Tiger Conservation Authority and the National Board for Wild Life.] _________________________ 1. Inserted by the Wild Life (Protection) (Amendment) Act, 2006, dated 03.09.06.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionHindu Minority and Guardinship Act,1956 Section 11
Title: De Facto Guardian Not to Deal with Minors Property
State: Central
Year: 1956
After the commencement of this Act, no person shall be entitled to dispose of, or deal with, the property of a Hindu minor merely on the ground of his or her being the de facto guardian of the minor.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Contract Act, 1872 Section 56
Title: Agreement to Do Impossible Act
State: Central
Year: 1872
.....A goes mad. The contract becomes void. (c) A contracts to marry B, being already married to C, and being forbidden by the law to which he is subject to practice polygamy, A must make compensation to B for the loss caused to her by the non-performance of his promise. (d) A contracts to take in cargo for B at a foreign port. A's Government afterwards declares war against the country in which the port is situated. The contract becomes void when war is declared. (e) A contracts to act at a theatre for six months in consideration of a sum paid in advance by B. On several occasions A is too ill to act. The contract to act on those occasions becomes void. ______________________ 1 . See section 65, infra.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 27
Title: Servient Owner Not Bound to Do Anything
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....as against the dominant owner, to use the servient heritage in any way consistent with the enjoyment of the easement; but he must not do any act tending to restrict the easement or to render its exercise less convenient. Illustrations (a) A, as owner of a house has a right to lead water and send sewage through B's land. B is not bound, as servient owner, to clear the water course or scour the sewer. (b) A grants a right of way through his land to B as owner of a field. A may feed his cattle on grass growing on the way, provided that B's right of way is not thereby obstructed; but he must not build a wall at the end of his land so as to prevent B from going beyond it, nor must he narrow the way so as to render the exercise of the right less easy than it was at the date of the grant. (c) A, in respect of his house, is entitled to an easement of support from B's wall. B is not hound, as servient owner to keep the wall standing and in repair. But he must not pull down or weaken the wall so as to make it incapable of rendering the necessary support. (d) A, in respect of his mill, is entitled to a water course through B's land. A must not drive stakes so as to.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionNew Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 Section 299
Title: Conditions of Service of Sweepers Employed for Doing House Scavenging
State: Central
Year: 1994
No sweeper, being employed for doing house scavenging of any building shall discontinue to do such house scavenging without reasonable cause or without having fourteen days' notice to his employer.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionMines Act, 1952 Section 85A
Title: Persons Required to Give Notice, Etc., Legally Bound to Do So
State: Central
Year: 1952
1[85A. Persons required to give notice, etc., legally bound to do so Every person required to give any notice or to furnish any information to any authority under this Act shall be legally bound to do so within the meaning of section 176 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)]. ______________________ 1 . Inserted by Act 62 of 1959, section 48 (w.e.f. 16-1-1960).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Easements Act, 1882 Section 24
Title: Right to Do Acts to Secure Enjoyment
State: Central
Year: 1882
.....detriment to the dominant owner, to cause the servient owner as little inconvenience as possible; and the dominant owner must repair, as far as practicable, the damage (if any) caused by the act to the servient heritage. Accessory rights.--Rights to do acts necessary to secure the full enjoyment of an easement are called accessory rights. Illustrations (a) A has an easement to lay pipes in B's land to convey water to A's cistern. A may enter and dig the land in order to mend the pipes, but he must restore the surface to its original state. (b) A has an easement of a drain through B's land. The sewer with which the drain communicates is altered. A may enter upon B's land and after the drain, to adapt it to the new sewer, provided that he does not thereby impose any additional burden on B's land. (c) A as owner of a certain house, has a right of way over B's land. The way is out of repair, or a tree is blown it own and falls across it. A may enter on B's land and repair the way or remove the tree from it. (d) A as owner of a certain field, has a right of way over B's land. B renders the way impassable A may deviate from the way and pass over the adjoining land to B.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Contract Act, 1872 Section 224
Title: Non-liability of Employer of Agent to Do a Criminal Act
State: Central
Year: 1872
Where one person employs another to do an act which is criminal, the employer is not liable to the agent, either upon an express or an implied promise, to indemnify him against the consequences of that Act.1 Illustration (a) A employs B to beat C, and agrees to indemnify him against all consequences of the act. B thereupon beats C, and has to pay damages to C for so doing. A is not liable to indemnify B for those damages. (b) B, the proprietor of a newspaper, publishes, at A's request, a libel upon C in the paper, and A agrees to indemnify B against the consequences of the publication, and all costs and damages of any action in respect thereof. B is sued by C and has to pay damages, and also incurs expenses. A is not liable to B upon the indemnity. _______________________ 1. See, section 24, supra.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Contract Act, 1872 Section 57
Title: Reciprocal Promise to Do Things Legal, and Also Other Things Illegal
State: Central
Year: 1872
Where persons reciprocally promise, firstly, to do certain things which are legal, and, secondly, under specified circumstances to do certain other things which are illegal, the first set of promises is a contract, but the second is a void agreement. Illustration A and B agree that A shall sell B a house for 10,000 rupees, but that, if B uses it as a gambling house, he shall pay A 50,000 rupees for it. The first, set of reciprocal promises, namely, to sell the house and to pay 10,000 rupees for it, is a contract. The second set is for an unlawful object, namely, that B may use the house as a gambling house, and is a void agreement.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial