Skip to content

Bare Act Search Results

Bare Acts + AI

From statute to cited judgments

Trial unlocks Semantic Search and AI Brief on judgments that interpret the acts you are researching.

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Repealed] Repealing Act 1

Title: Trade Marks Act 1999

State: Central

Year: 1958

partnership act 1932 9 of 1932 which is the proprietor of the mark from those of others h deceptively similar a mark shall be deemed to be deceptively similar to another mark if it so nearly resembles

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Repealed] Section 12

Title: Prohibition of Registration of Identical or Deceptively Similar Trade Marks

State: Central

Year: 1958

Matched in: Title Prohibition of Registration of Identical or Deceptively Similar Trade Marks

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Chapter VA

Title: Prohibition of Manipulative and Deceptive Devices, Insider Trading and Substantial Acquisition of Securities or Control

State: Central

Year: 1992

1 chapter va prohibition of manipulative and deceptive devices insider trading and substantial acquisition of securities or control 1 inserted by by act 59 of 2002

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Brief the judgments behind these acts

Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Section 12A

Title: Prohibition of Manipulative and Deceptive Devices, Insider Trading and Substantial Acquisition of Securities Orcontrol

State: Central

Year: 1992

sale of any securities listed or proposed to be listed on a recognised stock exchange any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of the provisions of this act or the rules or the regulations made

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 Section 12

Title: PROHIBITION OF REGISTRATION OF IDENTICAL OR DECEPTIVELY SIMILAR TRADE MARKS

State: Central

Year: 1958

Matched in: Title PROHIBITION OF REGISTRATION OF IDENTICAL OR DECEPTIVELY SIMILAR TRADE MARKS

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The ARUNACHAL PRADESH GOODS TAX ACT, 2005 (ACT NO. 3 OF 2005) Section 87

Title: Administrative penalties

State: Arunachal Pradesh

Year: 2005

amount of penalty payable under this sub section shall not exceed rupees ten thousand 10 false misleading or deceptive returns any person who a furnishes a return under this act which is false misleading or deceptive in

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Standards of Weights & Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 Section 4

Title: Provisions of this Act to over ride the Provisions of any other law, except the Standards Act The provisions of this

State: Himachal

Year: 1985

to resemble an authorised seal or stamp as the case may be intending by that resemblance to practice deception or knowing it to be likely that deception or knowing it to be likely that deception will thereby

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004 Chapter XIII

Title: CHAPTER XIII Penalties and Offences

State: Delhi

Year: 2005

thousand rupees 10 any person who a furnishes a return under this act which is false misleading or deceptive in a material particular or b omits from a return furnished under this act any matter or thing

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Chapter 2

Title: General Explanations

State: Central

Year: 1860

to counterfeit who causes one thing to resemble another thing intending by means of that resemblance to practise deception or knowing it to be likely that deception will thereby be practised 1 explanation 1 it is not

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 28

Title: "counterfeit"

State: Central

Year: 1860

to counterfeit who causes one thing to resemble another thing intending by means of that resemblance to practise deception or knowing it to be likely that deception will thereby be practised 1 explanation 1 it is not

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI research tools - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial