Skip to content

Bare Act Search Results

Bare Acts + AI

From statute to cited judgments

Trial unlocks Semantic Search and AI Brief on judgments that interpret the acts you are researching.

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Section 153

Title: Exclusion of Evidence to Contradict Answers to Questions Testing Veracity

State: Central

Year: 1872

far as it tends to shake his credit by injuring his character, no evidence shall be given to contradict him; but, if he answers falsely, he may afterwards be charged with giving false evidence. Exception 1.If a

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Section 156

Title: Exclusion of evidence to contradict answers to questions testing veracity

State: Central

Year: 2023

far as it tends to shake his credit by injuring his character, no evidence shall be given to contradict him; but, if he answers falsely, he may afterwards be charged with giving false evidence. Exception 1.--If a

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Assam Nongovernment (Deficit) College Central Pension and Provident Fund Act, 1997 Section 17

Title: Overriding effect Any provision of this Act, if contradicts to or conflicts with any provision of the C.P.F. Scheme

State: Assam

Year: 1997

Section 17 - Overriding effect Any provision of this Act, if contradicts to or conflicts with any provision of the C.P.F. Scheme Act, in giving effect to the provisions of

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Brief the judgments behind these acts

Madhya Pradesh Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1961 Section 19

Title: ORAL EVIDENCE IN CONTRADICTION OF STANDING ORDERS, ETC., NOT ADMISSIBLE No oral evidence having the effect of adding to

State: Central

Year: 1961

SECTION 19: ORAL EVIDENCE IN CONTRADICTION OF STANDING ORDERS, ETC., NOT ADMISSIBLE No oral evidence having the effect of adding to or otherwise varying

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Part 3

Title: Production and Effect of Evidence

State: Central

Year: 1872

in question, without such writing being shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Indian Evidence Act 1872 Chapter 10

Title: Of the Examination of Witnesses

State: Central

Year: 1872

in question, without such writing being shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before the writing can be proved, be called to those parts

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946 (20 of 1946) Section 12

Title: Oral Evidence in Contradiction of Standing Orders Not Admissible

State: Central

Year: 1946

No oral evidence having the effect of adding to or otherwise varying or contradicting standing orders as finally certified under this Act shall be admitted in any Court. STATE AMENDMENT 1Maharashtra: Gujarat

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 36

Title: Oral evidence in contradiction of standing orders not admissible

State: Central

Year: 2020

No oral evidence having the effect of adding to or otherwise varying or contradicting standing order as finally certified under this Chapter shall be admitted in any Court.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Regulation 12

Title: Oral evidence in contradiction of standing orders not admissible

State: Punjab

Year: 1946

No oral evidence having the effect of adding to or otherwise varying or contradicting standing orders finally certified under this Act shall be admitted in any Court. 28[ 12-A. Temporary application of

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 Section 36

Title: Oral evidence in contradiction of standing orders not admissible

State: Uttar Pradesh

Year: 2020

No oral evidence having the effect of adding to or otherwise varying or contradicting standing order as finally certified under this Chapter shall be admitted in any Court.

View Complete Act      List Judgments citing this section

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI research tools - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial