Bare Act Search Results

Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mokameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act 1978 Chapter VI

Title: Commissioner of Payments

State: Central

Year: 1978

.....meaning of section 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal code (45 of 1860) and the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195 and chapter XXVI of the code of criminal Procedure 1973 (2 of 1974). (7) A claimant who is dissatisfied with 4h decision of the Commissioner may prefer an appeal against the decision to the principle court of original jurisdiction within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the Mokameh unit or as the cad may be the registered office of Arthur Butler and Company is situated; Provided that where a person who is a Judge of A High Court is appointed to be the Commissioner such appeal shall lie to the High Court of the State in which the registered office of Britannia Engineering Company or as the case may be Arthur Butler and Company is situated and such appeal shall be heard and disposed of by not less than tow judges of that High Court. Section 22 - Disbursement of money by Commissioner After admitting the claim under this Act the amount due in respect of such claim shall be paid by the Commissioner to the person or persons to whom such sums are due and on such payment the liability of Britannia engineering.....

Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mokameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act 1978 Section 21

Title: Administration or Rejection of Claims

State: Central

Year: 1978

.....for the examination of witnesses (6) Any investigation before the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a judicial proceedings within the meaning of section 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal code (45 of 1860) and the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195 and chapter XXVI of the code of criminal Procedure 1973 (2 of 1974). (7) A claimant who is dissatisfied with 4h decision of the Commissioner may prefer an appeal against the decision to the principle court of original jurisdiction within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the Mokameh unit or as the cad may be the registered office of Arthur Butler and Company is situated; Provided that where a person who is a Judge of A High Court is appointed to be the Commissioner such appeal shall lie to the High Court of the State in which the registered office of Britannia Engineering Company or as the case may be Arthur Butler and Company is situated and such appeal shall be heard and disposed of by not less than tow judges of that High Court.

Small Cause Courts Act, 1964 Chapter I

Title: Preliminary

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

.....HD 63 CAD 64 dated 24.6.1964. Section 2 - Definitions Inthis Act, unless the context otherwise requires- 1 [(a) "Cityof Bangalore" shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Bangalore City CivilCourt Act, 1979;] 2 [(aa)]"Code" means the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (Central Act 5 of 1908); (b) "Court of SmallCauses" means a Court of Small Causes constituted or deemed to have beenconstituted under this Act and includes any person exercising jurisdictionunder this Act in any such Court; (c) "High Court" meansthe High Court of the 3 [State of Karnataka]; (d) "Judge" means a Judge of theCourt of Small Causes 1 [and in the City of Bangalore the Chief Judgeof the Court of Small Causes]; (e) "judicial service"shall have the same meaning as in clause (b) of Article 236 of the Constitution of India; (f) "notification"means a notification published in the official Gazette. _________________________ 1. Inserted by Act 13 of 1980w.e.f.17.11.1980. 2. Relettered by Act 13 of 1980w.e.f. 17.11.1980. 3. Adopted by the Karnatakaadoptation of Laws order 1973 w.e.f. 1.11.1973.

Small Cause Courts Act, 1964 Section 1

Title: Short Title, Extent and Commencement

State: Karnataka

Year: 1964

(1) This Act may be called the1[Karnataka] Small Cause Courts Act, 1964. (2) It extends to the whole of the1[State of Karnataka]. (3) It shall come into force on such2[date] as the State Government may, by notification, appoint. ______________________ 1. Adopted by the Karnataka adoptation of Laws order 1973 w.e.f. 1.11.1973. 2. Act came into force w.e.f. 1.7.1964 by Notification No. HD 63 CAD 64 dated 24.6.1964.

The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 2014

.....the following Ordinance: Short title and commencement. 1. (1) This Ordinance may be called the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014. (2) It shall come into force at once. Amendment of section 3 of Act 6 of 2014. 2. In the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, in section 3, for the words, brackets, letters and figures Khammam (but excluding the revenue villages in the Mandals specified in G.O.Ms. No. 111 Irrigation & CAD (LA IV R&R-I) Department, dated the 27th June, 2005 and the revenue villages of Bhurgampadu, Seetharamanagaram and Kondreka in Bhurgumpadu Mandal), the words and brackets Khammam (but excluding the Mandals of Kukunoor, Velairpadu and Bhurgampadu but not including its revenue villages of Pinapaka, Morampalli Banzar, Bhurgampad, Nagineniprolu, Krishnasagar, Tekula, Sarapaka, Iravendi, Mothepattinagar, Uppusaka, Sompalli and Nakripeta under the Palvancha Revenue Division, and the Mandals of Chintoor, Kunavaram, Vararamachandrapuram and Bhadrachalam but not including the revenue village of Bhadrachalam under the Bhadrachalam Revenue Division) shall be substituted.