Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: actionable claim Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 130 results (0.014 seconds)Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free TrialChit Funds Act, 1982 Chapter XII
Title: Disputes and Arbitration
State: Central
Year: 1982
.....the date of the order or award, appeal to the State Government. Section 71 - Money how recovered Every order passed by the Registrar or the nominee under section 68 or section 69 and every order passed by the State Government in appeal under section 70 for payment of any money shall, if not carried out, - (a) on a certificate issued by the Registrar, be deemed to be a decree of a civil court, and shall be executed in the same manner as a decree of such court, or (b) be executed in accordance with the provisions of any law for the time being in force for the recovery of amounts as arrears of land revenue: Provided that no application for execution under clause (b) shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date fixed in the order, and if no such date is fixed, from the date of the order. Section 72 - Private transfer of property made after issue of certificate void against foreman Any private transfer or delivery of, or encumbrance or charge on property made or created after the issue of the certificate by the Registrar under section 71 shall be null and void against the foreman on whose application the said certificate was issued.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionChit Funds Act, 1982 Section 67
Title: Procedure for Settlement of Disputes and Powers of Registrar or Nominee
State: Central
Year: 1982
(1) The Registrar or the nominee hearing a dispute under section 66, shall, in addition to the powers conferred on him under that section, have the same powers as are vested in a civil court while trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), in respect of the following matters, namely:- (a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of persons and examining them on oath; (b) requiring the discovery and inspection of documents; (c) receiving evidence on affidavits; (d) requisitioning any public record or copies thereof from any court or office; (e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents; and (f) any other matter which may be prescribed. (2) Except with the permission of the Registrar or the nominee, no party shall be represented at the hearing of a dispute by a legal practitioner. (3) (a) If the Registrar or the nominee is satisfied that any person, whether he is a subscriber or not has acquired any interest in the property of a person who is a party to a dispute, he may order that the person who has acquired the interest in the property may be joined as a party to the dispute and any decision that may be given by the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionThe Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 Complete Act
State: Bihar
Year: 1982
.....of tenants (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any contract or law to the contrary but subject to the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947), and to those of Section 18, where a tenant is in possession of any building, he shall not be liable to eviction therefrom except in execution of a decree passed by the Court on one or more of the following grounds,-- (a) for breach of the conditions of the tenancy, or for subletting the building or any portion thereof without the consent of the landlord, or if he is an employee of the landlord occupying the building as an employee, on his ceasing to be in such employment; (b) where the condition of the building has materially deteriorated owing to acts of waste by, or negligence or default of the tenant or of any person residing with the tenant or for whose behaviour the tenant is responsible; (c) where the building is reasonably and in good faith required by the landlord for his own occupation or for the occupation of any person for whose benefit the building is held by the landlord : Provided that where the Court thinks that the reasonable requirement of such occupation may be substantially.....
List Judgments citing this sectionAndhra Scientific Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 Section 21
Title: Admission or Rejection of Claims
State: Central
Year: 1982
.....of evidence on affidavits; (d) the issuing of any commission for the examination of witnesses. (6) Any investigation before the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code and the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purposes of section 195, and Chapter XXVI, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (7) A claimant who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Commissioner may prefer an appeal against such decision to the principal civil Court of original jurisdiction within the local .imits of whose jurisdiction the registered office of the Company is situated : Provided that where a person who is a Judge of High Court is appointed to be the Commissioner, such appeal shall lie to the High Court exercising jurisdiction over the place in which the registered office of the Company is situated and such appeal shall be heard and disposed of by not less than two Judges of that High Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAmritsar Oil Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 Section 18
Title: Proof of Claims
State: Central
Year: 1982
.....producible as evidence; (c) the reception of evidence on affidavits; (d) the issuing of any commission for the examination of witnesses. (6) Any investigation before the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code and the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a civil Court for the purpose of section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (7) A claimant, who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Commissioner, may prefer an appeal against the decision to the principal civil Court of original jurisdiction within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the Amritsar Oil Works is situated : Provided that where a person who is a Judge of a High Court is appointed to be the Commissioner, such appeal shall lie to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and such appeal shall be heard and disposed of by not less than two Judges of that High Court.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAndhra Scientific Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 Section 18
Title: Claims to Be Made to the Commissioner
State: Central
Year: 1982
Every person having a claim against the Company with regard to any of the matters specified in the Schedule pertaining to any undertaking owned by it shall prefer such claim before the Commissioner within thirty days from the specified date1. Provided that if the Commissioner is satisfied that the claimant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the claim within the said period of thirty days, he may entertain the claim within a further period of thirty days, but not thereafter. ____________________________ 1. 19-12-1985 appointed as such specified date.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAndhra Scientific Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 Section 20
Title: Examination of Claims
State: Central
Year: 1982
(1) On receipt of the claims made under section 18, the Commissioner shall arrange the claims in the order of priorities specified in the Schedule and examine the same in accordance with such order. (2) If, on examination of the claims, the Commissioner is of opinion that the amount paid to him under this Act is not sufficient to meet the liabilities specified in any lower category, he shall not be required to examine the claims in respect of such lower category.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAmritsar Oil Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 Section 17
Title: Claims to Be Made to the Commissioner
State: Central
Year: 1982
Every person having a claim against the Amritsar Sugar Mills Company in relation to the Amritsar Oil Works shall prefer such claim before the Commissioner within thirty days from the specified date : Provided that if the Commissioner is satisfied that the claimant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the claim within the said period of thirty days, he may entertain the claim within a further period of thirty days but not thereafter.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionAndhra Scientific Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982 Section 19
Title: Priority of Claims
State: Central
Year: 1982
The claims made under section 18 shall have priorities in accordance with the following principles, namely :-- (a) Category I shall have precedence over all other categories and Category II shall have precedence over Category III, and so on; (b) the claims specified in each of the categories shall rank equally and be paid in full, but, if the amount is insufficient to meet such claims in full, they shall abate in equal proportions and be paid accordingly; and (c) the question of discharging the liability with regard to a matter specified in a lower category shall arise only if a surplus is left after meeting all the liabilities specified in the immediately higher category.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionDevadasis (Prohibition of Dedication) Act, 1982 Section 6
Title: Protection of Action Taken in Good Faith
State: Karnataka
Year: 1982
No suit, prosecution, or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Government or any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial