Bare Act Search Results

The PUDUCHERRY VILLAGE AND COMMUNE PANCHAYATS ACT, 1973 Section 305

Title: Res-judicata and pending suits and cases

State: Pondicherry

Year: 1974

Matched in: Title Res-judicata and pending suits and cases

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 11

Title: RES JUDICATA No court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been

State: Central

Year: 1908

Matched in: Title RES JUDICATA No court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Part 1

Title: SUITS IN GENERAL Jurisdiction of the Courts and res judicata

State: Central

Year: 1908

Matched in: Title SUITS IN GENERAL Jurisdiction of the Courts and res judicata

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Part I

Title: Suits in General

State: Central

Year: 1908

the A.O. 1948. 4. Substituted by the A.O. 1950, for "His Majesty in Council". Section 11 - Res judicata No Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has … does not preclude the Courts in 1 [India] from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action. _________________ 1. Substituted by Act 2 of 1951, section 3, for "the States" (w.e.f. 1-4-1951). 2. Substituted by

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Complete Act

State: Central

Year: 1908

sections 24, 38 to 41, 75, clauses Part1 - SUITS IN GENERAL Jurisdiction of the Courts and res judicata Section9 - COURTS TO TRY ALL CIVIL SUITS UNLESS BARRED The Courts shall Section10 - STAY OF SUIT … done to the person or Section20 - OTHER SUITS TO BE INSTITUTED WHERE DEFENDANTS RESIDE OR CAUSE OF ACTION ARISES Subject to the limitations aforesaid, Chapter2 - OBJECTIONS TO JURISDICTION Section21A - BAR ON SUIT TO SET

The Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972 Chapter 4

Title: CHAPTER II

State: Punjab

Year: 1972

prescribed under the Act., the petitioners have forfeited the right to challenge the same which operate as re judicata between the petitioners and the State Government. Paro Bai etc. vs. State, 1989 PLJ 46 Gift deed -- … authorities below. Sahi Ram vs State of Punjab through Collector, Ferozepur, 1992(1) SLJ 928=1992 PLJ 313. Cause of action -- On behalf of the appellants, it was stated that the land, which was declared surplus, remained in

The Chhattisgarh kamdhenu vishwavidyalaya Act, 2011 Section 52

Title: (])

State: Chattisgarh

Year: 2011

The Chancellor shall have the rigl'tt'to catise a'Ninspecti on, to be made by suet;'.:. }115pe~tion and · Enquiry. [ i"'·• person or persons as he may direct, of- (a)' the Visbwavidyalaya, its, bu'.ildi'iigs,'Jaboratories, libraries, museums,,_ (...

The Periyar University Act, 1997 Section 50

Title: (1) The Syndicate may

State: Tamil Nadu

Year: 1997

deaf-ruute or has applied to be adjudicated or has been adjudi- 1 cated, as an insolvent. (3) No actio ~uuder ~ this section shall be taken against any person unless he has been given a reasonable opportunity

The Punjab Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Ragging) Act, 2013. Section 4

Title: (1)

State: Punjab

Year: 2013

caseafter afterthe theenquiry sub-section (3). enquiryunder undal sub-section(3). (5) (5) The TheHead Headofofthe theinstitution shall have to take actio n ininacco institutionshall have to take action rdance accordanee PUNJAB GOVT. PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ. GAZ. (EXTRA), (EXTRA), APRIL

The Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993 Section 109

Title: Certain suits against members officers etc. to be defended

State: Madhya Pradesh

Year: 1994

suit against any o.fficebearer, o.fficer o.r servant o.f a 21Panchayat o.r Gram Sabha] arising aut o.fanything dane o.rany actio.n taken by him under this Act o.r the rules o.rbyelaws made thereunder, shall be defended by the 3[Panchayat