Bare Act Search Results
Home Bare Acts Phrase: abet Page 1 of about 1,044 results (0.006 seconds)Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Chapter 5
Title: Of Abetment
State: Central
Year: 1860
.....abetment, A is liable to the punishment provided for murder. Section 112 - Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done If the act for which the abettor is liable under the last preceding section is committed in addition to the act abetted, and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences. Illustration A instigates B to resist by force a distress made by a public servant. B, in consequence, resists that distress. In offering the resistance, B voluntarily causes grievous hurt to the officer executing the distress. As B has committed both the offence of resisting the distress, and the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt. B is liable to punishment for both these offences; and, if A knew that B was likely voluntarily to cause grievous hurt in resisting the distress A will also be liable to punishment for each of the offences. Section 113 - Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 109
Title: Punishment of Abetment if the Act Abetted is Committed in Consequence, and Where No Express Provision is Made for Its Punishment
State: Central
Year: 1860
..... Explanation.--An act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy, or with the aid which constitutes the abetment. Illustrations (a) A offers a bribe to B, a public servant, as a reward for showing A some favour in the exercise of B's official functions. B accepts the bribe. A has abetted the offence defined in section 161. (b) A instigates B of give false evidence. B, in consequence of the instigation, commits that offence. A is guilty of abetting that offence, and is liable to the same punishment as B. (c) A and B conspire to poison Z. A in pursuance of the conspiracy, procures the poison and delivers it to B in order that he may administer it to Z. B, in pursuance of the conspiracy, administers the poison to Z in A's absence and thereby causes Z's death. Here B is guilty of murder. A is guilty of abetting that offence by conspiracy, and is liable to the punishment for murder.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 111
Title: Liability of Abettor when One Act Abetted and Different Act Done
State: Central
Year: 1860
When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it: Proviso.--Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment. Illustrations (a) A instigates a child to put poison into the food of Z, and gives him poison for that purpose. The child, in consequence of the instigation, by mistake puts the poison into the food of Y, which is by the side of that of Z. Here, if the child was acting under the influence of A's instigation, and the act done was under the circumstances a probable consequence of the abetment. A is liable in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had instigated me child to put the poison into the food of Y. (b) A instigates R to burn Z's house, B sets fire to the house and at the same time commits theft of property there. A, though guilty of abetting the burning of the house, is not guilty of abetting the theft; for the theft was a distinct act, and not a probable consequence of the.....
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 116
Title: Abetment of Offence Punishable with Imprisonment--if Offence Be Not Committed
State: Central
Year: 1860
.....for that offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the longest term provided for that offence, or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with born. Illustrations (a) A offers a bribe to B, a public servant, as a reward for showing A some favour in the exercise of B's official functions. B refuses to accept the bribe. A is punishable under this section. (b) A instigates B to give false evidence. Here, if B does not give false evidence, A has nevertheless committed the offence defined in this section, and is punishable accordingly. (c) A, a police-officer, whose duty it is to prevent robbery, abets the commission of robbery. Here, though the robbery be not committed, A is liable to one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offence, and also to fine. (d) B abets the commission of a robbery by A, a police-officer, whose duty it is to prevent that offence. Here, though the robbery be not committed, B is liable to one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for the offence of robbery, and also to fine.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionInformation Technology Act, 2000 Section 84B
Title: Punishment for Abetment of Offences
State: Central
Year: 2000
1[84B. Punishment for abetment of offences. - Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Act for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence under this Act. Explanation.-An act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy, or with the aid which constitutes the abetment.] _________________ 1. Inserted vide Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionForeigners Act, 1946 Section 14C
Title: Penalty for Abetment
State: Central
Year: 1946
Whoever abets any offence punishable under section 14 or section 14A or section 14B shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence. Explanation.--For the purpose of this section,-- (i) an act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy, or with the aid which constitutes the offence. (ii) the expression "abetment" shall have he same meaning as assigned to it under section 107 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).]
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 113
Title: Liability of Abettor for an Effect Caused by the Act Abetted Different from That Intended by the Abettor
State: Central
Year: 1860
When an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, caused a different effect from that intended by the abettor, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect. Illustration A instigates B to cause grievous hurt to Z. B, in consequence of the instigation, causes grievous hurt to Z. Z dies in consequence. Here, if A knew that the grievous hurt abetted was likely to cause death, A is liable to be punished with the punishment provided for murder.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 115
Title: Abetment of Offence Punishable with Death or Imprisonment for Life--if Offence Not Committed
State: Central
Year: 1860
.....the abeltor shall be liable to imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to fourteen years, and shall also be liable to fine. Illustration A instigates B to murder 2. The offence is not committed. If B had murdered Z, he would have been subject to the punishment of death or3[imprisonment for life]. Therefore A is liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and also to a fine; and if any hurt be done to Z in consequence of the abetment, he will be liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years, and to fine. ___________________ 1 . Substituted by Act 26 of 1955, section 117 and Schedule, for "transportation for life" (w.e.f. 1-1-1956).
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionProtection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (Central) Section 17
Title: Punishment for Abetment
State: Central
Year: 2012
Whoever abets any offence under this Act, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, shall be punished with punishment provided for that offence. Explanation. -- An act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy or with the aid, which constitutes the abetment.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this sectionIndian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Section 108A
Title: Abetment in India of Offences Outside India
State: Central
Year: 1860
1 [108A. Abetment in India of offences outside India A person abets an offence within the meaning of this Code who, in 2 [India], abets the commission of any act without and beyond 2 [India] which would constitute an offence if committed in 2 [India]. Illustration A, in 2 [India], instigates B, a foreigner in Goa, to commit a murder in Goa. A is guilty of abetting murder.] _____________________ 1. Added by Act 4 of 1898, section 3. 2. The words "British India" have successively been Substituted by the A.O. 1948, the A.O. 1950 and Act 3 of 1951, section 3 and Schedule to read as above.
View Complete Act List Judgments citing this section- << Prev.
- Next >>