.....of occurrence By whom detected Offence is punishable under section 5 of Meghalaya Tree (Preservation) Rules, 1976. "TABLE" Full Report of The Facts Enclosed . (To be framed not later than the day after occurrence) _________________ ______ Beat/ Range. Statement of the Accused. Signature of the accused. Forest Department, Meghalaya, Khasi Hills Division, Offence Report No. Dated Memo. No. Dated Forwarded to the District Magistrate, Khasi Hills, Shillong with application for issue of process and the following documents:- Divisional Forest Officer, Khasi Hills Division, Shillong. FORM NO. IX Rule 3 (1) Meghalaya Tree (Preservation) Rules, 1976. Forest Department: Meghalaya Khasi Hills Division, Shillong. Memo No. Dated .. From: The Divisional Forest Officer, Khasi Hills Division, Shillong. To, The District Magistrate, Khasi Hills District, Shillong. CASE STATE VERSUS . Ref: Offence u/s 3 road with sec.5 of the Meghalaya Tree (Preservation) Rules, 1976. Sir, Whereas the marginally noted persons have committed an offence specified in the accompanying offence report and whereas the facts can be proved by the evidence of witnesses.....
List Judgments citing this section.....and (2) Unless the prosecution is instituted within three months from the date on which the offence is alleged to have been committed. Power to make rule 11 (1) The State Government may make rules to carry out the purposes of this Act. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely: - (a) the form and manner of applications to be made for permission under sub-section (1) of Section 3 and disposal thereof, appeals to the Conservator of Forests and the fees payable therefore; (b) the procedure to be followed in hearing and deciding appeals under Section 4; (c) any other matter. Repeal of the Meghalaya Rules 1 of 1976 12 The Meghalaya Tree (Preservation) Rules, 1976 (1 of 1976) is hereby repealed. Meghalaya State Acts
List Judgments citing this section.....a bonded labourer. This presumption may be rebutted by the employer and also by the State Government if it so chooses but unless and until satisfactory material is produced for rebutting this presumption, the Court must proceed on the basis that the labourer is a bonded labourer entitled to the benefit of the provisions of the Act. Bandhua Mukti Morcha, Petitioner v. Union of India and others, Respondents. AIR 1984 SUPREME COURT 802 13. VIGILANCE COMMITTEE. - (1) Every State Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute such number of Vigilance Committees in each district and each Sub-Division as it may think fit. (2) Each Vigilance Committee, constituted for a district, shall consist of the following members, namely- (a) the District Magistrate, or a person nominated by him, who shall be the Chairman; (b) three persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes and residing in the District, to be nominated by the District Magistrate; (c) two social workers, resident in the district, to be nominated by the District Magistrate; (d) not more than three persons to represent the official or non- official agencies in the district.....
List Judgments citing this section