Precedent No. 23
AFFIDAVIT: IN A CIVIL REVISION PETITION - SEEKING INJUNCTION
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No of 20
In
Civil Revision Petition No of 20
Petitioner:
Vs.
Respondent:
AFFIDAVIT of S/o , aged years,
residing in
The deponent abovenamed, hereby solemnly affirms and declares as
follows:—
referred toabove. Being well conversant with the facts and circumstances
of thepresent case, the deponent is fully competent to swear to this
authority.The deponent will be referred to as the petitioner
hereinafter.
in O.S. No of on the files of the Principal Sub-Judge,
of,inter alia, a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction to the
defendantrestraining him from disposing of the suit property to a third
party. An
application, I.A. No , for temporary injunction was also filed
alongwith the suit, with a view to restrain the respondent-defendant
from disposing of the suit property to a third party during the pendency
of the suit.
thepetitioner's counsel, the learned sub-Judge did not take up the same
forhearing. Finally, when the petitioner's counsel repeatedly pressed
forhearing the interlocutory application, the respondent's lawyer made
anoral application to decide the question of maintainability of the suit
andjurisdiction as a preliminary question. Accordingly, without hearing
theinjunction application, the learned sub-Judge passed an Order dated
finding the issue of jurisdiction and maintainability against the
petitioner.
Revision Petition is filed.
aforesaid situation, the respondent has speeded up his negotiations with
prospective buyers to dispose off the suit property.
negotiations and eventually give shape to his dishonest and malicious
intention to dispose off the suit property during the pendency of the
suit, the very purpose of the suit will stand defeated and the
petitioner will suffer such irreparable injury as will not be capable of
being remedied by way of damages.
That the grant of the injunction in favour of the petitioner will not,
in any case, adversely affect jeopardize the respondent's lawful rights
during the pendency of Civil Revision. Therefore, the balance of
convenience is in favour of the injunction being granted.
It is, therefore, just and necessary that this Hon'ble Court may be
pleased to pass an Order of ad interim injunction restraining the
respondent from disposing off the suit property to any third party
during the pendency of the suit.
SdJ Deponent.
Verification
Verified at on this the day of ,20 , that
the contents of the above affidavit are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge, belief and information and nothing material has been
concealed therefrom.
SdJ Deponent.
Solemnly affirmed and signed before me by the deponent, who is
personallyknown to me, on this the day of , 20
SdJ
Counsel for the deponent.
Note: Affidavit to be attested by the appropriate authority prescribed
under law. Prayer may be avoided and only facts be stated in affidavit
to the possible extent.