Wrongful Restraint - Law Dictionary Search Results
Home Dictionary Name: wrongful restraintWrongful restraint
Wrongful restraint, Whoever voluntarily obstructs any person so as the prevent that person from proceeding in any direction in which that person has a right to proceed, is said wrongfully to restrain that person. (Indina Penal Code, s. 339)Whoever voluntarily obstructs any person so as to prevent that person from proceeding in any direction in which that person has a right to proceed, is said wrongfully to restrain that person.Exception.-The obstruction of a private way over land or water which a person in good faith believes himself to have a lawful right to obstruct, is not an offence within the meaning of this section. (Indian Penal Code, s. 339)...
Wrongful confinement
Wrongful confinement, wrongful confinement is a wrongful restraint in such a manner as to prevent that person from proceeding beyond a certain circumscribed limits and this offence has nothing to do with the investigation or search, Shyam Lal Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1972 SC 886: (1972) 1 SCC 764 (770): (1972) 3 SCR 422. (Indian Penal Code, s. 342)Whoever wrongfully restrains any person in such a manner as to prevent that person from proceedings beyond certain circumscribing limits, is said 'wrongfully to confine' that person. (Indian Penal Code, s. 340)...
restraint of trade
restraint of trade 1 : an act, fact, or means of curbing the free flow of commerce or trade [covenant not to compete with an employer after leaving is in restraint of trade and must be reasonable to be enforced] 2 : an attempt or intent to eliminate or stifle competition, to effect a monopoly, to maintain prices artificially, or otherwise to hamper or obstruct the course of trade and commerce as it would be if left to the control of natural and economic forces [the Sherman Antitrust Act declared every contract, combination, and conspiracy in restraint of trade to be illegal] ;also : the means (as a contract or combination) employed in such an endeavor see also horizontal restraint, per se rule, rule of reason, vertical restraint Sherman Antitrust Act in the Important Laws section ...
Restraint of marriage
Restraint of marriage. On the ground of public policy, conditions attached to gifts or bequests to a person who has never been married, if in general restraint of marriage, are void, i.e., the donee or legatee takes the gift or bequest whether he or she marry or not; but a condition in restraint of the second marriage, whether of a man or woman, is not void, see Allen v. Jackson, (1875) 1 Ch D 399, and a condition is good if the restraint be partial only, e.g., if there be a bequest, with a gift over if the legatee should marry a particular person, or without a particular person's consent. Consult Theobald on Wills.A condition (esp. in a gift or bequest, that nullifies the grant to which it applies of the grantee marries or remarries, Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn., p. 1316....
Restraint of trade
Restraint of trade. Contracts in general restraint of trade--that is, that a party shall not carry on a particular trade at all--are void on the ground of public policy, Mitchel v. Reynolds, (1711) 1 P Wms 181; 1 Sm LC, but contracts in partial restraint of trade--that is, where the restraint does not extend further than is necessary for the reasonable protection of the party for whose protection it has been agreed to--are good, if made, although by deed, for some consideration, and if not injurious to the public interests of this country. See the Nordenfelt case,1894 AC 535, in which it is recognised that the law of this subject has been gradually growing in liberality, Attwood v. Lamont, (1920) 3 KB 571; Dewas v. Fitch, (1921) 2 AC 158; and consult Leake or Chitty on Contracts.An agreement between or combination of businesses intended to eliminate competition, create a mono-poly, artificially raise prices, or otherwise ad-versely affect free market, Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn....
prior restraint
prior restraint : governmental prohibition on expression (esp. by publication) before the expression actually takes place see also Near v. Minnesota and New York Times Co. v. United States in the Important Cases section compare censorship, freedom of speech NOTE: In New York Times Co. v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court restated its position that “any system of prior restraints” bears “a heavy presumption against constitutional validity” and that the government “carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint.” ...
Tort
Tort [fr. tortus, Lat.], an injury or wrong independent of contract, as by assault, libel, malicious prosecution, negligence, slander, or trespass (see those titles). Actions are divided into actions in contract and actions in tort: see as to county Court jurisdiction in actions of tort when claim is under 100l. (except libel, slander seduction). See County Courts Act, 1934, s. 40, and as to costs of actions of tort commenced in High Court which could have been commenced in County Court, see s. 47, and COUNTY COURT. An action founded on tort was Tort [fr. tortus, Lat.], an injury or wrong independent of contract, as by assault, libel, malicious prosecution, negligence, slander, or trespass (see those titles). Actions are divided into actions in contract and actions in tort: see as to county Court jurisdiction in actions of tort when claim is under 100l. (except libel, slander seduction). See County Courts Act, 1934, s. 40, and as to costs of actions of tort commenced in High Court whic...
horizontal restraint
horizontal restraint : a restraint of trade involving an agreement among competitors at the same distribution level for the purpose of minimizing competition ...
restraint
restraint 1 a : an act or fact of restraining see also prior restraint b : the state of being restrained 2 a : a means of restraining b : a device that restricts movement (as of prisoners or violent psychiatric patients) ...
restraint on alienation
restraint on alienation :something that serves to prevent a party from alienating property ;specif : a provision in an instrument (as a deed or will) that purports to prohibit or penalize the use of the power of alienation NOTE: Though not necessarily unlawful, restraints on alienation are disfavored in the law. ...
- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial