V - Law Dictionary Search Results

Reason to believe

good faith; it cannot be merely a pretence, S. Narayanappa v. CIT, Bangalore, AIR 1967 SC 523: (1967) 65 ITR 219:

precise definition. Concept of 'public policy' is considered to be vague, susceptible to narrow or wider meaning depending upon the content

50l. or both. Public parks. See PARK, and also 22 Vict. c. 27, and 34 & 35 Vict. c. 13. See

Keep your definitions linked to case research

of public order as is commonly understood, Romesh Lal Jain v. Naginder Singh Rana, (2006) 1 SCC 294. Public order, has

inaccurately as synonymous with the right to possess, Gurucharan Singh v. Kamla Singh, (1976) 2 SCC 152. Possession, does not imply

account of some order prejudicially affecting his interests, K.C. Pazhanimala v. State of Kerala, AIR 1969 Ker 154: (1968) ILR 2

having a distinctive name, character or use, Hindustan Poles Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise, (2006) 4 SCC 85: (2006) 4

will hurt no person) See Broom's Leg. Max., citing Cumber v. Wane, (1719) 1 Str. 126; 1 Smith L. C., in

of Sikkim Laws (No. 1) order, 1975, Kunga Nima Lepcha v. State of Sikkim, AIR 2006 Sikkim 1. The law of

is alone binding as a precedent, Uttaranchal Road Transport Corporation v. Mansaram Nainwal, (2000) 6 SCC 366. A precedent acquirers added

Try the research workspace — 7 days free