State V First - Law Dictionary Search Results
Instigate
or emotion without intending the consequences to actually follow cannot be said to be instigation, Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chattisgarh, AIR 2001 SC 3837 (3844). (Penal Code, 1860, ss. 306 & 107); see also (2003) 12 … State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2002 SC 1998 (2000): (2002) 5 SCC 371. (Penal Code, 1860, s. 107 Firstly) Instigate, denotes incitement or urging to do some drastic or inadvisable action or to stimulate or incite, Sanju
Fellow - servant
caused by the negligence of a fellow-servant, Priestly v. Fowler, (1837) 3 M. & W. 1, but this state of the law was altered by the (English) Employers Liability Act, 1880 (43 & 44 Vict. c. 42), … the law was altered by the (English) Employers Liability Act, 1880 (43 & 44 Vict. c. 42), at first limited to expire on the 31st December, 1887, but since continued by successive (English) Expiring Laws Continuance Acts.
First information report
Matched in: Term First information report
Keep your definitions linked to case research
libel
: the crime or tort of publishing a libel see also single publication rule New York Times Co. v. Sullivan in the Important Cases section compare defamation, slander NOTE: Although libel is defined under state case law … state case law or statute, the U.S. Supreme Court has enumerated some First Amendment protections that apply to matters of public concern. In New York … of liber book] 1 : complaint used esp. in admiralty and divorce cases 2 a : a defamatory statement or representation esp. in the form of written or printed words ;specif : a false published statement that
Made at any time after the first day of January 1946
Matched in: Term Made at any time after the first day of January 1946
Banking company
may be a banking company, it is in the first place necessary that it must be a 'company', State Bank of Travancore v. Mohammed Mohammed Khan, AIR 1981 SC 1744: (1982) 1 SCR 338: (1981) 4 SCC
Law relating to
fall under the latter part of Art. 19(6) and would inevitably have to satisfy the test of the first part of Art. 19(6), Virajlal Manilal and Co. v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1970 SC 129: (1969) … that the relation must be real, reasonable and prominent and not far-fetched or problematical, Ram Shankar Tewari v. State, 1954 All WR (HC) 334: 1954 Cr LJ 1212: 1954 All 562. Law relating to, the effect of
Second offence
the second offence with a higher penalty and for the third a still higher penalty, Jagdish Prasad v. State of U.P., AIR 1966 SC 290 (292): (1965) 3 SCR 806. See also AIR 1960 Ker 240 (241). … any of the acts mentioned in cls. (a) to (g) in it, he shall be punishable for the first offence with a certain penalty, for the second offence with a higher penalty and for the third a
Reason to suspect
that stage the question of adequate proof of facts alleged in the first information report does not arise, State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604 (618): 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335. [Criminal Procedure Code,
Requisition and acquisition
subject to one condition, i.e., the property acquired or requisitioned must be for public purpose, Jiwani Kumar Paraki v. First Land Acquisition Collector, AIR 1984 SC 1707: (1984) 4 SCC 612: (1985) 1 SCR 686. … for a limited period whereas the acquisition is taking over of title of the property permanently. But the State has the power both of requisition as well as acquisition, subject to one condition, i.e., the property acquired
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free