Somebody - Law Dictionary Search Results

Home Dictionary Name: somebody

disowning

the refusal to acknowledge something or somebody as ones own...

leg pull

An attempt to make somebody believe something that is not true done as a joke...

leg pulling

The act of attempting to make somebody believe something that is not true done as a joke...

Somebody

A person unknown or uncertain a person indeterminate some person...

Administrator, means the Administrator as referred to in clause (a) of section 2 of the Unit Trust of India (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act, 2002 (58 of 2002). [Income Tax Act, 1961, s. 80C(8)(i)].Administrator means a person appointed by competent authority to administer the estate of a deceased person when there is no executor. [Indian Succession Act (39 of 1925) s. 2(a)]--he to whom the property of a person dying intestate, or without executors appointed, accepting, or surviving, is committed by the Probate Court (now the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division of the High Court of Justice). (English) Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925, s. 56(3). By the (English) Court of Probate Act,1857 (20 & 21 Vict. c. 77) (re-enacted in (English) Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925, s. 175), 'Administration' includes all letters of administration of the effects of deceased persons, whether with or without the will annexed, and whether granted for ge...

Bailment

Bailment [fr. bailler, Fr., to deliver], a compendious expression to signify a contract resulting from delivery; perhaps best defined as a 'delivery of a thing in trust for some special object or person, and upon a contract express or implied, to conform to the object or purpose of the trust.'In the celebrated case of Coggs v. Bernard, (1704) Ld Raym 909; 1 Sm L C, Lord Holt divided bailments thus:-(1) Depositum, or a naked bailment of goods, to be kept for the use of the bailor.A restaurant keeper has been held liable for loss of an overcoat entrusted by a customer to a waiter, Ultzen v. Nicols, (1894) 1 QB 92; Orchard v. Bush & Co., (1898) 2 QB 284.(2) Commodatum. Where goods or chattels that are useful are lent to the bailee gratis, to be used by him. See Coughlin v. Gillison, (1899) 1 QB 145.(3) Locatio rei. Where goods are lent to the bailee to be used by him for hire.(4) Vadium. Pawn or pledge.(5) Locatio operis faciendi. Where goods are delivered to be carried, or something is t...

Litigative puppetry

Litigative puppetry, the technique of making someone to litigate, while somebody else, who is the real beneficiary of the litigation controls matters from the background. In the instant case workers of coal mines were the writ petititoners, but the court believed that they were actually being used a facade for illicit mine exploiters. [Mahindranath v. State of Bihar, AIR 1980 SC 1308 (1309), para 1]. (Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer)...

Wholly and exclusively

Wholly and exclusively, the expression 'wholly and exclusively' used in s. 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 does not mean 'necessarily'. Ordinarily it is for the assessee to decide whether any expenditure should be incurred in the course of his or its business. Such expenditure may be incurred voluntarily and without any necessity and if it is incurred for promoting the business and to earn profits, the assessee can claim deduction under s. 10(2)(xv) of the Act even though there was no compelling necessity to incur such expenditure. It is relevant to refer at this stage to the legislative history of s. 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which corresponds to s. 10(2)(xv) of the Income Tax Act, 1922. An attempt was made in the Income Tax Bill of 1961 to lay down the 'necessity' of the expenditure as a condition for claiming deduction under s. 37. S. 37(1) in the Bill read 'any expenditure . . . laid out or expended wholly, necessarily and exclusively for the purposes of the business or ...

<< Prev.
Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial