Sharma V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Reduction in rank
the other post carries the same emoluments, it certainly places the incumbent to lower rank in hierarchy, Ramanugarh Sharma v. Vice Chancellor, 1985 BLJR 195. Reduction in rank, is a punishment inflicted on Government servants under the service
Habitually
4 SCC 126. [Also see The Law Lexicon (2nd Edn.), P. Ramanatha Aiyar] Connotes same act of continuity, Sharma Prashant Raje v. Ganpatrao, (2000) 7 SCC 522. The expression 'habitually' would obviously mean repeatedly or persistently, Amanulla
Landlord
the ground that he requires possession in good faith for his own occupation, M.M. Quasim v. Manohar Lal Sharma, AIR 1981 SC 1113: (1981) 3 SCC 36. [Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Central Act, 1947, s.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Acquisition
property and as this had been taken over it constituted an acquisition within the constitutional provision, Guru Datta Sharma v. State of Bihar, AIR 1961 SC 1684 (1695): 1962 (2) SCR 292. The expression 'acquisition' in the definition
Joint-tenancy
notice to one joint tenant is sufficient to germinate the entire tenancy, Ramesh Chand Bose v. Gopeshwar Pd. Sharma, AIR 1977 All 38.
Use
utili-zation of disposal. Mere 'non-use' is not included in the word 'use', State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ramagya Sharma Vaidya, AIR 1966 SC 78.
Mutatis mutandis
Mutatis mutandis, implies applicability of any provision with necessary changes in points of detail, Prahlad Sharma v. State of U.P., (2004) 4 SCC 113. Mutatis mutandis, means 'with the necessary changes in points of detail,
Reasonable requirement
not in the mind of the person requiring the accommodation but reasonable according to the actual facts, Damodar Sharma v. Nandram Deviram, AIR 1960 MP 345 (FB). Connotes something more than desire but less than absolute necessity, Petro-leum
Substitute
be equal to it, but differently expressed, N.N. Chakravarty v. State of Assam, AIR 1960 Assam 11; I.C. Sharma v. Union of India, (1992) 21 ATC 63; Vijayalakshmi Rice Mills; New Contractors Company v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
Quic quid plantatur (or fixature) solo, solo cedit
in effect that there are substantial exceptions to the application of the maxim, N.P.A. Chettiar Firm v. H.C. Sharma, AIR 1928 Rang 145. This principle is based on the well known maxim 'quicquid plantatur solo solo cedit',
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free