Sections 5 - Law Dictionary Search Results
judgment n.o.v.
judgment n.o.v. [Medieval Latin non obstante veredicto] judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Empire Settlement Act, 1922 (English) (12 & 13 Geo. 5, c. 13)
Empire Settlement Act, 1922 (English) (12 & 13 Geo. 5, c. 13), 'to make better provision for furthering British settlement in His Majesty's Overseas Dominions,' provides for the
Rule 10b-5
Rule 10b-5 [10b-5 from the section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pursuant to which the rule was formulated] : a rule adopted
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Any person
used i.e. third party, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'v. Asha Rani, (2003) 2 SCC 223. Any person, in section 147 of Motor Vehicle Act 1988 would not cover all persons who were travelling in goods carriage in … tenants or other persons claiming right on their own, including a stranger, Shreenath v. Rajesh, (1998) 4 SCC 543.
Bar, trial at
entirely discretionary with the court to grant it, unless the Crown be interested (see as to this, Dixon v. Farrar, Sec. of Board of Trade, (1886) 18 QBD 43), when the Attorney-General may demand it as of
Direction
direction which the appellate or revisional authority, as the case may be, is empowered to give under the section, ITO v. Murlidhar Bhagwandas, AIR 1965 SC 342: (1964) 6 SCR 411. It must be an express direction … the appellate or revisional authority, as the case may be, is empowered to give under the section, ITO v. Murlidhar Bhagwandas, AIR 1965 SC 342: (1964) 6 SCR 411. It must be an express direction necessary for
Recognition
inevitable conclusion. Mere inaction de hors such compelling circumstances cannot amount to recognition within the meaning of the section, T.V.V. Narasimhamam v. State of Orissa, AIR 1963 SC 1227 (1232). [Madras Estates Land Act (1 of 1908) … inaction de hors such compelling circumstances cannot amount to recognition within the meaning of the section, T.V.V. Narasimhamam v. State of Orissa, AIR 1963 SC 1227 (1232). [Madras Estates Land Act (1 of 1908) s. 3(2)(d)] Confirmation
Actual bodily harm
from venereal disease, had marital intercourse with his wife and thereby infected her, cannot be convicted under this section, R. v. Clarence, (1888) 22 QBD 23. The expression is also used in the Dangerous Performances Acts, 1879 … indictment for an assault occasioning actual bodily harm the accused may be convicted of a common assault, R. v. Oliver, (1860) 30 LJMC 12. A husband, who, whilst suffering from venereal disease, had marital intercourse with his
Lawful purpose
as opposed to not forbidden, by law because that meaning best gives effect to the object to the section, Taikato v. Queen, (1996) 186 CLR 454 … the term or it can mean a purpose that is supported by a positive rule of law, Crafter v. Kelly, (194) SASR 237. Should be read as a purpose that is authorised, as opposed to not forbidden,
E-filing Administrator
the purpose of administration of this Scheme. [Electronic Filing of Returns of Tax Collected at Source Scheme, 2005, section 2(5)]
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free